Well that's not what I've seen recently.
Cameron wants to claim 'dithering' on the one hand and an uncaring brushing aside of people's concerns the next (as he and his shadow cabinet give
no lead and say nothing of substance that anyone might discuss).
To me (and considering this is supposed to be the 'alternative Gov in waiting') that is about as cowardly, irresponsible, weak and shallow as it
Sadly that's as per with Cameron & Co..
Sorry if you thought that was a silly & empty swipe.
I do not think Cameron & Co. have done the right thing at all.
I didn't bash at the LibDems at all.
Neither do I accept your description of a month's debate and access to Ministers & scientific experts as "chit chats and hugs with Gordon".
It's quite clear that there is a gulf between what the bill actually proposes and how it is being described by certain religious groups here in the
I quite like the idea of my MP voting on an informed basis and in him or her being familiar with the truth of the matter as opposed to the distorted
manipulated untruth/outright lie.
I just don't go along with the idea that main planks in the Gov's program can be held hostage to this sort of thing, that's all.
I can accept the claims about an individuals religious conscience but nevertheless we are a secular society and the individuals own personal religious
beliefs are not the basis for running our country
(I had thought we had decided that by and large we were against this kind of thing.....or is it only when the label Muslim gets applied?).
From what I can see a highly complex Bill has been reduced to a distorted tabloid nonsense by those who would pursue their religious interests.
Scientists say RC Clergy inflaming embryo debate
[edit on 25-3-2008 by sminkeypinkey]