FBI Sets up Fake Child Porn Links That if Clicked Trigger Armed Raids on Users

reply to post by jackinthebox


lol
for sure, im just a little kid. *innocent eyes*

(who happens to know many sexual deviants on a very personal basis)

Originally posted by BiohazardsBack

how do i know them?

its called the internet. i get to know people, and online they tend to reveal pretty personal things to me mainly because im so honest with them(not to mention im 17, which gets even more people like that to talk to me).
its not sick and perverted either. its not like they mean to do it, its just how they are.
they live normal lives and date normal similarly-aged girls, they go to school, they go to work, and they sometimes get aroused by small children.
i honestly dont see a problem with it if its controlled.




[edit on 1-5-2008 by BiohazardsBack]

I think I understand what you mean.

Actions and thoughts are two different things.

People shouldn't judge, because I'm sure you have all had strange thoughts in the past, E.G killing someone, killing yourself, stealing, sex with teacher, rape etc etc.

Action, that's where one should judge you. From the actions you make. A pedophile who has never even thought of touching a child, is of strong will, and is probably a good guy in the end, because he has made no action.

Saying that thou, if I had children I would keep them away from any person who thought like that! Sorry but my children stays safe away from people like that. But I understand is all I'm saying. They have made no sin, and should not be judged unless they have made some action, which I bet 99% of pedo's don't.






[edit on 1-5-2008 by _Phoenix_]

reply to post by BiohazardsBack

for sure, im just a little kid. *innocent eyes*

(who happens to know many sexual deviants on a very personal basis)

I never meant that you were just some little kid, nor did I say that you were innocent. But obviously your lack of life experience led you to do something that you were ignorant of the reprecussions of. And I don't mean that in an offensive way either. Everyone is ignorant of something.

And knowing sexual deviants, or even having sexual experience, does not give one overall life experience. And thinking that it does will only make you appear less mature. You can try to grow up as fast as you want, but every year still has twelve months in it.

What you did was childish. But keep in mind that many adults make childish mistakes. But only adults can admit their mistakes. And only the wise will learn from them.

[edit on 5/1/0808 by jackinthebox]

Interesting to see this discussion still going!! Well, I agree with whoever above mentioned people having fetish/fantasies that they do not act on.

These days, we have options... Much less than in the past. I know a phone sex line, or a porn of Japanese schoolgirls may not feel like it satisfies the desires or whatever, but many do take advantage of these adult services, play out their little fantasies... And then go back to their normal, boring life, wife, family, etc. Fantasies are healthy.

I have a lot of respect for people who use such adult services, and would never ever consider acting out these fantasies in real life.. aka. cheating, rape, kids, donkeys, WHATEVER it is. They are good people.

Originally posted by jackinthebox
reply to post by BiohazardsBack

 

I never meant that you were just some little kid, nor did I say that you were innocent. But obviously your lack of life experience led you to do something that you were ignorant of the reprecussions of. And I don't mean that in an offensive way either. Everyone is ignorant of something.

And knowing sexual deviants, or even having sexual experience, does not give one overall life experience. And thinking that it does will only make you appear less mature. You can try to grow up as fast as you want, but every year still has twelve months in it.

What you did was childish. But keep in mind that many adults make childish mistakes. But only adults can admit their mistakes. And only the wise will learn from them.

[edit on 5/1/0808 by jackinthebox]

I was just joking about that 2-line post.
i dont think sexual experience is life experience, i was just making a joke.
which was directly related to my false claim of innocence.
anyways.

reply to post by BiohazardsBack

I was just joking about that 2-line post.

Sorry. Maybe it was the collar that led me to think otherwise.

I hate to say it, but creating false links to kiddie porn is 100% unnecessary and is very bad news. Now, all they have to say is "kiddie porn" and they can frame anyone.


That includes "thought criminals" on ATS.


Terrorism and porn are used as justifications to strip us of our civil liberties.

reply to post by thetruth777


I agree with you. How many people new to the internet might accidently click on something like that, that they think is actually LEGAL "barely 18" porn?? I mean, without this thread, I do not think I would believe there's CHILDREN "porn" in existence and on the internet. Young looking girls sell.

The FBI is SICK, SICK.

Originally posted by LostNemesis
reply to post by thetruth777

 

I agree with you. How many people new to the internet might accidently click on something like that, that they think is actually LEGAL "barely 18" porn?? I mean, without this thread, I do not think I would believe there's CHILDREN "porn" in existence and on the internet. Young looking girls sell.

The FBI is SICK, SICK.

And if we go deeper, we have the FBI making the porn! The Elite are the absolute SICKEST people there. Just read trance-formation of america, available here under ebooks, and you'll see a survivor testimony of MONARCH trauma-based mind control. According to Cathy O Brian, the kind of porn the Elite make, I tell you, dwarfs ANYTHING you see on the net.


So leads me to question, if the FBI MAKES the porn, then why is it trying to pick out porn viewers? Problem-reaction-solution to regain control over online freedom of speech that so "inconveniently" made it possible for the masses to WAKE UP?

[edit on 1-5-2008 by thetruth777]

Originally posted by thetruth777

So leads me to question, if the FBI MAKES the porn, then why is it trying to pick out porn viewers? Problem-reaction-solution to regain control over online freedom of speech that so "inconveniently" made it possible for the masses to WAKE UP?

No, I don't think the FBI makes porn - a few rogues aside. However maybe they are aware of what lies beyond the tip of the iceberg and both knowingly & unknowingly by keeping others from stumbling upon that truth they are protecting everyone (including the dark side), regardless of their reasons for doing so.

reply to post by verylowfrequency





You know, this whole business smells like problem-reaction-solution incrementalism.

FBI uses problem of porn to get a "foothold" into the internet, and then it will spread to "anti-govt." websites like infowars and ATS.

reply to post by chromatico


It's not impossible. Granted if it is an obvious reference to porn, accidents aren't likely. But if it is vague or even misleading, some people will click on it just to see what it is. Heh, someone may even be so shocked that they get too frantic to control the mouse, then whammo, they've accidentally clicked it. I'm kidding of course, but hey, it's possible.

Brandon

This said it was topped but I can't find the topped post..

Anyway... um, where exactly would these "links" be? On Google? On 'normal' porn sites? You cannot legally operate or participate in a porn site in any way unless the site legally disclaims that the shown participants are all 18+ and it's the truth. Am I going to start seeing pedo links on MSNBC? I don't get it. Wouldn't the only places they could actually put these things be places that should be investigated anyway?

reply to post by Orion Crystal Ice


Why is this country so uptight about porn? As long as they are over 18, I suppose it's fine - I have absolutely nothing against porn, who here has never check out a site or two or three (hundred+)? There are way too many sex related shows/commercials on tv as it is, porn is up against heavy competition. I have no problem with the FBI checking in on people who go too far. They should also check up on Catholic priests while they are at it. I'm sure they have a list out there somewhere of people to check up and keep tabs on. They must be pretty busy these days, I'm sure they are hiring if anyone wants to look into it. I'm quite sure they are not looking for anti govt folks which pretty much excludes everyone on this site. For the record, I happen to think that the govt we have in place now is a joke.

Huh?

I dunno why that was a reply to me. Did I miss something?

Originally posted by LostNemesis
I agree with you. How many people new to the internet might accidently click on something like that, that they think is actually LEGAL "barely 18" porn?? I mean, without this thread, I do not think I would believe there's CHILDREN "porn" in existence and on the internet. Young looking girls sell.

lmao, reminds me of a site that had *no* hint about it's content at all, which turned to be out a gay porn site.

Stupid thing was that you see nothing until you press ENTER, and then, it's too late.

Images followed, blergh.

I get that kind of thing all the time.

For instance it's pretty much a fact that you can't search anything on Google for a few pages without there being boobs and more. It's pretty amazing. I've thrown in weirder and weirder combinations of words, but just got weirder and weirder sex dug up for me.

Originally posted by Solarskye
I could see people making a mistake and clicking the wrong button.

What if....

What if your arch enemy was seeking revenge...

What if he/she got the link to one of these FBI traps?

What if they sent you a link via email, or IM or even thread post that said..

Hey this is the BEST UFO video EVER
Florida UFO Sighting

Oh dear you didn't REALLY click on that did you?



So now you have this nasty picture on your computer...
So the average user deletes it...

But its still in the temp internet files... its still in the waste basket
And only a few really know how to clean it permanently

Bubye now... do write maybe we can send you a file in a cake

A question. Can pictures of 16-17 year olds be defined "child porn" ?
In my opinion not, but somehow I think the FBI could think they can.
If that's the case I think many should start to worry. Heck, me too
as I have (private) photos and videos of me and my girlfriend, who is
under 18.

reply to post by Shirakawa


The answer to your question is "yes." If I have a tape of myself and a girl having sex when we were underage, and I post it, I go to jail.