reply to post by OptionToChoose
"Did you, or did you not make a claim that there is zero evidence for said dark star or rogue planet? I think you did."
Lets go on a tangent on this for a moment: If there is 'no evidence for:' something; it stands to reason that the evidence against is
self-evident.
But just in case:
There is no evidence in the geological tables for a celestial intruder event.
There are no tales handed down via word of mouth (unless you count very open-to-interpretation comet stories and someone deciding that texts mean
something based on personal merit.
There are probably hundreds of thousands of ama. astronomers around the world-with tech sophisticated enough to locate tine asteroids-they can find
nothing on a highly debated topic-lets assume that 5% are looking... 5% of say: 100,000 watching the skies probably once a week in areas predicted to
be the approach vector. 5,000 conjectural astronomers hunting the areas for years ('nemesis star' has been around for half a century). I would say
that alone is strong evidence against.
Contrary to certain posts planet wobbles and axis centers do not indicate anything even close to a planetary object swooping in from off axis: Ever
watched a spinning top that was off-center/not completely spherical?
Etc.



BUT I KNOW IT IS ALL TOO LATE NOW AND EVERYONE IS ASLEEP TO
ALMOST EVERYTHING inc here