What, so we can't debunk OP's claims anymore? Can't ask for more evidence?
From 2000, other american observatiories radiotelescopes and neutrino telescopes leaked to the American Universities the information about the observation of some 460 spherical radiation sources of subatomic particles and neutrinos.
Originally posted by Malech
reply to post by chissler
Are we at least allowed to point out factual errors by the OP that might have a bearing on whether their story is credible?
For example, they talk about 'neutrino telescopes'.
From 2000, other american observatiories radiotelescopes and neutrino telescopes leaked to the American Universities the information about the observation of some 460 spherical radiation sources of subatomic particles and neutrinos.
Neutrino telescopes do not exist.
This means that the claims by the OP with regards to the usage of 'neutrino telescopes' and sources of neutrinos being discovered are just plain false, which I'm sure you would agree lays some serious doubts upon the rest of their material.