It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Bob Lazar's website, and Element 115

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 22 2008 @ 12:11 AM
link   
I'm new to the blog, but I've seen some pretty self-gratifying debunking posted against Bob Lazar's credibility, and against the existance of Element 115. People claim to have enough education to fit abstract concepts into the brain, but not enough imagination to connect the dots.

It's my assertion that the force of gravity acting upon the Space-time ether is not exactly instantaneous. If I could postulate on Einstein's theory of simultanaeity, and use the principles of electromagnetism, a suitable hypothesis might be reached. In the omnicron config, the Sportmodel stays "buoyant" with the gravity A amplifier acting upon the earth's gravity B, with pulses at an interval of 7.46hz. Just like 3-phase AC induction motors operate at speed rates inversely proportional to the lines of flux emitted from the internal magnets, it is proposed that accessing gravity at a phase 0-90 degrees will generate repulsion, and 90-180 will generate attraction. With this analogy, an induction motor operates either forward or reverse by changing the order of the line phase, gravity disturbance can be accessed with the same concept in mind. The amplifier is not creating gravity, but rather triggering a wavefront that is harnessed. What NOBODY in this blog has learned, is that a grav A amplifier cannot act upon nothing. If the Sportmodel is a sitting duck in dead space without a large planet or moon from which to push or pull, the vessel will go nowhere, up sewage-creek without a paddle. Taken for granted that earth has a consistant gravitational field, everybody assumes both gravity's will always be present, but that is false. This is why space travel is done using a zig-zag of smaller "leaps", rather than one large burst to the destination. Refer to Rob Lazar's website for better insight.
Somebody didn't understand why this vessel doesn't disintegrate after travelling beyond the speed of light. The theory behind maximum distortion necessary for interstallar travel, is that the vessel is enveloped in a gravitational field, and 3 amplifier beams intersect at an infinite distance from the craft. The amount of energy transmuted from Element 115 is dependant on the distance your destination point is from your start point. Too much and you could collide with a moon or planet, too little energy and you become a sitting duck in space. Vector jumps are carefully planned and not just a simple throttle of the gas. A planned jump is to create a wavefront in the Space-time ether like a sling-shot, then letting go is to then turn off the gravity amplifier and release this wavefront to send the vessel funnelling through the "ether" and rest in a different location. During this transition to the destination point, the vessel would vibrate because of the external impact of Transverse Magnetic waves. Think of it as funneling a powder into a drinking bottle; a little bit of powder flows nicely, too much powder clogs the neck of the funnel and nothing passes. The vessel must pass through the gravity distortion field "neck" without imploding from shock.

I find StarTrek science to be misleading, even though it inspires imagination, it skews the understanding of the process of events that actually occur. Interstellar travel in near instantaneous, because the vessel does not propel itself through the vast distances, but instead rides the kinetic energy of the generated wavefront that is created, while encapsulated in a Transverse Magnetic wave barrier (bubble).




posted on Mar, 22 2008 @ 01:22 AM
link   
It's just simple quantum physics and procurement of element 115 from a supernova...what's the issue here?

(This sarcastic response is intended for comedic purposes only. Please do not take issue with the author as he only infers jocularity.)



posted on Mar, 22 2008 @ 02:19 AM
link   
The amplifier is not creating gravity, but rather triggering a wavefront that is harnessed

That's creating gravitational waves, aka gravity.

The physics is still completely magic.

To get to the point: what is the physical origin of the coupling between matter and gravity? What are the particle interactions?

In actual gravity we know about (Einsteinian is still the best theory, validated over and over and over and over), the source term (analogue of charge in electromagnetism) is the stress energy tensor, taking all mass and energy fields in a huge lump (everything gravitates), but the coupling constant is extremely small.

For gravity to be engineerable, there has to be something with an enormously larger coupling constant and very exotic physics we don' tknow about. So far, we have seen exactly zero hard evidence for this, unfortunately.

Something with a large coupling constant, many upon many orders of magnitude larger than gravity as we know it now (e.g. it takes the mass of the Sun to deflect light by a small fraction of a degree) would be so strong we should have seen SOMETHING by now.

Electromagnetism also has a long-range interaction like gravity and its coupling physics (charge) is ubiquitous and everywhere, the existence of atoms themselves use it.

So for another long range force like gravity, the effects of additional physics should be everywhere especially with a strong coupling piece of matter. Where is it?



posted on Mar, 22 2008 @ 09:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by mbkennel

The amplifier is not creating gravity, but rather triggering a wavefront that is harnessed

Something with a large coupling constant, many upon many orders of magnitude larger than gravity as we know it now (e.g. it takes the mass of the Sun to deflect light by a small fraction of a degree) would be so strong we should have seen SOMETHING by now.

Electromagnetism also has a long-range interaction like gravity and its coupling physics (charge) is ubiquitous and everywhere, the existence of atoms themselves use it.


I'm not the type to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Bob Lazar hasn't gone into any detail about the coupling constant; how the transmuted energy of Element 115 is transferred from the reactor to the any or all of the gravity amplifiers is knowledge that's been withheld. My mind doesn't close and I don't suddenly switch to debunking the whole theory. We do know that magnetism can be transferred. By putting a large magnet in with a jar of nails, the molecules in the nails will align with the polarity of the magnet. The same must hold true with a type of metal that makes contact with the Element 115 wedge and transfers its properties through an on-board control system to navigate the vessel and position the amplifiers.

Personally, another question I would have is how transparency of the hull is achieved under one of the arches without any sort of breach to its integrity; thus creating a window. I'm assuming this is done after the systems are powered up, but before a Transverse Magnetic wave barrier is formed around the vessel, but I would wonder HOW?

Secondly, the lower curved section is formed to serve as a lense or guide for the gravity waves. This tells you that some metals are able to channel gravity waves like an antenna for a radio signal (at 7.46hz), while other metals allow gravity to pass right through it like the lense of a camera. A lack of explanation doesn't mean the whole concept is false.

By the way, I wrote that gravity is not created, but rather a wavefront is triggered in the Space-time ether. Gravity is the result of the binding force that holds atoms and molecules together. A wavefront is the distending of "flux lines" within the Space-time ether (by emitting pulses of energy at 7.46hz originating from the Element 115 source). Either by attraction or repulsion, the observed gravity is a result this built-up energy being released, the vessel rides the crest of this temporal disturbance.
When you use a slingshot and a folded metal bottle cap as a projectile, it would be impossible to throw that cap with the same velocity and distance as you could with the outstretched elastic of the slingshot. Difference is the Space-time ether is folded onto itself at great distances (allowing the vessel to pass through this "compressed fold" like a differentially permiable membrane, but it's a fairly rough ride), rather than the wavefront serving as a catapult for the vessel.
Gravity sources originate with Element 115, and a large celetial body (a figurative trampoline for takeoff). You cannot create gravity because it's already there. The question on everybody's mind is how to access it, and harness its power.
Electricity exists in most all molecules (namely the bias between copper and zinc), and voltage sources originate with a surplus of negatively charged electrons, like static electricity. You can transfer electrons from a balloon to your hair, then have the balloon cling to a wall for a certain time. You've created a static effect by simply transferring the electrons from an balloon to your hair.
No, you haven't created any electricity.
When your cellphone dies, and you charge it up, you haven't created new electricity in your phone, you've simply replenished the capacity of its battery.



new topics

top topics
 
1

log in

join