reply to post by Bigwhammy
As an avid reader of anything by Richard Dawkins, a 21-year Christian-turned-Agnostic, and a firm believer in the scientific evidence that is
evolution, I find it offensive (and sad) that you assume I have a "world view" that is Darwinism or materialism, or that we are all "communists."
It shocks me that you believe that the only reason a person would be a good humanitarian would be due to belief in reward after death. I am a medical
pathologist and devote my life to the sick. I am actively involved in several "causes" including animal rights, child welfare, and eradicating
malaria in Africa. I don't do these things because I think I'll be rewarded after death, but because I want to do them. Being raised in a devout
Christian home, I know firsthand that Christianity is highly revolved around a materialistic reward after death (i.e. "mansions" and "streets of
gold"). So, please don't assume that anyone who doesn't believe in God lives a life of materialism, and that the Christian afterlife isn't based
on that exact ideal.
In addition, when I first read "The God Delusion" I also did not totally agree that exposing a child to religion was "child abuse." However, I had
an experience that changed my mind. I recently attended a funeral for an infant baby, whose 5-year old sister was "saved" and "repented and gave
her life to the Lord." It was so disturbing to me that this baby was allowed to make those kinds of decisions without even knowing there are other
options for her. I saw myself in that child, and began to understand the reality of the abuse that Dr. Dawkins mentions in his writings. These
children are brainwashed (which is abuse), simply because they are not allowed to be exposed to all their options before determining the path of
belief, or non-belief which they will tread.