It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by undo
personally, i think the last 8 years of the bush presidency have been a deliberate and concentrated effort to blame christians for everything, and a massive opportunity to get on the national TV and actually call them uneducated louts. I still can't believe I saw this on CNN. What the freak are they thinking?
I was on the Dean's list and the President's list in college. I'm not an idiot.
this is the kinda crap hitler did to the jews. first find someone to blame, then
make sure the press and anything else influential does a thorough job of making them look like a scar on society.
[edit on 25-3-2008 by undo]
Originally posted by melatonin
So communism works against darwinian theory? Communism is not anything like darwinism. Someone wanting to work against natural processes like evolution and human nature was darwin's problem?
So when Darwin said that socialism and darwinism are different things he was right?
Cool. Darwinism didn't lead to gulags. Implementing a non-darwinian socio-economic policy led to gulags (doesn't follow, as communism says nothing about gulags). And using non-darwinian agricultural approaches led to famine and death (that does follow more).
Maybe people should have listened to Darwin more closely (not really, as Darwin's theory is not a social theory, but agriculture, yes). In fact, it appears that some capitalist economists did. One of the people who led to the collapse of a building society in the UK was a big fan of natural selection and the power of the unfettered free market (he was a biologist - matt ridley). A very Darwinian process. Do we blame that on the influence of darwin?
New thread: 'Darwin's theory led to the collapse of banks and the possibility of a coming recession: T'was teh Atheist conspiracy!'
Originally posted by AshleyD
Originally posted by riley
I already showed exactly how it is. It certainly does not change on your say so.
And I already showed exactly what it meant. It certainly does not change on your say so.
:shk: :shk: :shk:
Not to be rude
but you were wrong and apparently seem to be trying to finagle your way around it any way you can.
No-one has EVER claimed hundreds or thousands were killed. The article implies they have.
No it does not. It is showing exactly what I said: With the way the SWT's are constantly thrown in the face of Christians you would think it would have been Christian America's version of the Holocaust (Yes, now I am exaggerating to hit the point home).
:shk: :shk: :shk:
I can get picky and twist things around, too. Watch this:
The article does not exaggerate. It admits there were less than 25. It seems you were trying so hard to pick it apart for any little thing by assigning the article's author intentions that simply are not there.
:shk: :shk: :shk:
It seems you were trying so hard to pick it apart for any little thing by assigning the article's author intentions that simply are not there.
:shk: :shk: :shk:
If the author had gone on and on about people claiming the SWT's had killed thousands then I could see your point.
However, that is not what he/she does. I do see what you're trying to say but it looks like you're just blowing things out of proportion in order to find something to gripe about.
Sort of like whoever it was who entered this thread and then jumped Whammy's butt for using the word 'airbrush' in his title instead of 'revise.'
:shk: :shk: :shk:
Whammy,, type "Atheist" there for the author assumes the reader would have the common sense to fill in the blank or the default unbelief being born Atheist. We forget how they resist having that name attached to anything other then what ever it is they are against.
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by Bigwhammy
And I do believe you see where I'm coming from.
Wonder what was going on with those rescue attempts.
That was a huge mess too. How could that many mechanical
and pilot errors happen in the same top secret military
campaign, i have no idea.
wasn't he a member of the tri-lateral commission? not a very
happy happy joy joy organization, in the conspiracy fields.
anyway, the USA is supposed to be multicultural. anyone in charge
of it, should be multiculturally-minded, and have the ability to see
past the end of their own paradigms.
the media has a responsibility to report the news, not have huge
maps of the usa with the words JESUSLAND printed across it and polls
showing how vast portions of the usa are christian idiots.
i'm still flabbergasted they put that on the news
Originally posted by Bigwhammy
Whoever said they were the same thing? That's you building straw men. I pointed out the relationship. I was right. The fathers of communism are on my side. They claim Darwin. So do you. That's not my responsibility. Sorry if it's uncomfortable for you.
There is an undeniable unity between Atheism, the theory of evolution, and communism. Evolution claims that life is the product of blind chance, we are not made in the image of a divine creator, and we are simply animals.
But if you don't airbrush history, you will recall Communism was a massive failure. They resorted to massive slaughter of human life. They had no value for human life. They believed we are just mammals and we ought to just do it like on discovery channel. In their frustration they resorted to eliminating the "so called" mutations of society. Usually people of faith and the weaker member of society. Sure they completely bastardized Darwin's ideas for their own evil ends. They justified their evil actions using them. It's not Darwin's fault I agree . But you can not deny the relationship either.
Good point! You should start that Thread Mel.
pseudoscientific