It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Perhaps so, but Atheism itself doesn't suggest anything about the value of life, only the absence of a god. The government may use Atheism as a platform to further their absurd agendas, but that doesn't make Atheism an accomplice to their crimes. If there are 10 governments that perpetuate the kind of atrocities you describe, and they are all Atheist governments, that still doesn't make Atheism the culprit. There is a deeper agenda at work in those governments. We can take just about an religion,idea, philosophy, whatever, and twist and contort it so that we can use it to further our own selfish agendas. That is a human tendency that has no roots in any belief system.
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by Gigatronix
their atheist government is implicit in the decision:
Originally posted by Bigwhammy
reply to post by Damien_Hell
Welcome to the real world.
On July 25, 1978, Louise Joy Brown, the world's first successful "test-tube" baby was born in Great Britain. Though the technology that made her conception possible was heralded as a triumph in medicine and science, it also caused many to consider the possibilities of future ill-use.
testtube
Originally posted by Gigatronix
Perhaps so, but Atheism itself doesn't suggest anything about the value of life, only the absence of a god. The government may use Atheism as a platform to further their absurd agendas, but that doesn't make Atheism an accomplice to their crimes. If there are 10 governments that perpetuate the kind of atrocities you describe, and they are all Atheist governments, that still doesn't make Atheism the culprit. There is a deeper agenda at work in those governments. We can take just about an religion,idea, philosophy, whatever, and twist and contort it so that we can use it to further our own selfish agendas. That is a human tendency that has no roots in any belief system.
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by Gigatronix
their atheist government is implicit in the decision:
Originally posted by undo
Jesus came to make that kind of thing unnecessary.
Obsolete. He made the stoning of women a thing of the past.
He made lots of positive changes. Its people who corrupt it.
It's unbelief that corrupts it.
If life has no value, yes atrocities would continue and grow. However, the word sacred is not a neccessary part of this debate. Value and respect is, and it's something that religious people and Atheists share, for the most part. Those who don't share that value and respect, it's not because of their faith or lack of faith, it's because they are just ignorant, plain and simple. I don't need a "big guy in the sky holding me accountable" to keep me from murdering,stealing, lying and the rest. I just know those things are wrong and that are consequences for doing those things. Nor do I need that big guy in the sky to tell me whats right and wrong, I figured it out just fine, as do many other people.
Originally posted by undo
What I'm trying to do is prove that if life has no sacred value, and there's no big guy in the sky who will ask you to account for your actions, this kind of atrocity will be global and it will be rationalized away when the correct answers are so very simple!
Originally posted by melatonin
Why are we stuck in infanticide?
If we take the bible at face value, wiping out first-borns and kids can also be associated with theism.
Wasn't it all first borns in egypt? Life is just so sacred, except for the unworthy.
Atheist DID go on this campaign to use the crusades and the witch trials, hitler etc and link the common denominator to religion.
Originally posted by Bigwhammy
It was the evil Egyptians wiping out all first borns. Not Gods people. That was the enemy. Moses was hidden away and then put in a basket on the river so he survived.
Originally posted by Bigwhammy
. Especially atheists because they will be forced to assume that no one at all is responsible - because God doesn't exist... right? ohhhhh or it it only when you want to blame him
Originally posted by Damien_Hell
The Egyptians believed in Rah and Set and Bastet, and ALL those awesome gods you learn about from Stargate SG-1
Originally posted by Damien_Hell
reply to post by Bigwhammy
We're talking about your beliefs, not whether god is real or not