It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Archives show Clinton lied: Obama campaign

page: 1

log in


posted on Mar, 21 2008 @ 04:48 AM

Archives show Clinton lied: Obama campaign

White House documents reveal that Hillary Clinton lied to voters about her opposition to a trade pact blamed in industrial states for killing jobs, Barack Obama's campaign said Thursday.

Obama aides said the schedules undermined the New York senator's most contentious claims of foreign policy experience.

They highlighted an ABC News report which cited participants at one White House meeting in 1993 as saying Clinton was "fully supportive" of NAFTA.
(visit the link for the full news article)

posted on Mar, 21 2008 @ 04:48 AM
I actually agree with Obama on this one. The Clinton family have proven their loyalty to big business, but have shown little support for the American people.

They are globalists and are one and the same as McCain and his supporters. I have not seen corruption run quite as deep in Obama, although he is no saint.

"It does make you wonder if this was one of the reasons [the NAFTA report] why there was such a reluctance to get those records out there on a timely basis," Obama strategist David Axelrod said on a conference call.

Before the March 4 primary in Ohio, Clinton had savaged the Obama campaign for its alleged inconsistency on NAFTA and asserted her own opposition to the pact, which her husband Bill had fought hard to get through Congress.

"There was only one problem: she wasn't telling the truth to Ohio voters," Axelrod said.

"It is no secret that passing NAFTA was a priority of the Clinton administration, but numerous contemporary accounts make clear that Hillary Clinton was personally opposed to NAFTA, and her position on NAFTA was and remains consistent," it said.

Hillary was trying to distance herself from Bill, but it seems there really was no difference after all.

Does anyone really want to see another 4-8 years of the Clintons?

I am really sick of the Bush-Clinton duopoly and would rather see Big Bird as President rather than another rigged election from these scum.
(visit the link for the full news article)

posted on Mar, 21 2008 @ 04:51 AM
What?! Hillary Clinton lied?! Again?!

Who would've thought?!

You are right though. She has demonstrated a clear loyalty to the highest bidder, aka big business. Whether it's NAFTA or taking money from lobbyists, she is just another tool.

posted on Mar, 21 2008 @ 05:15 AM
reply to post by bigbert81

Yeah the Clintons lying? How is that possible?

Bill is infamous for lying about a blowjob, now Hillary will be infamous for lying about...well just about everything under the sun.

It looks as if the American people will have another 4 years of crooks and liars in the White House.

No surprise here

posted on Mar, 21 2008 @ 08:06 AM
Yeah your right guys. We don't need a duopoly Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton.

Lets go for the tri-fector.

We could recruit Chelsea after her mom.

And then there's always the Bush twins...

Wha -uh what ?

Oh just another nightmare.

posted on Mar, 21 2008 @ 09:25 AM

Originally posted by biggie smalls
I have not seen corruption run quite as deep in Obama, although he is no saint.

That's because he's a newbe.

Actually, in the very short time he has been involved in politics on a national level (6 years or so), he has managed to get himself placed on the Judicial Watch list of the 10 most corrupt US politicians. He's right alongside Hillary and Huckabee on the list.

That's pretty quick.

As for Hillary telling lies .... DUH!
She's a Clinton.

top topics

log in