It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Anyone know where the 2003 Bilderberg meeting is?

page: 1

log in


posted on Dec, 22 2002 @ 07:52 AM
Jus wondering if anyone has any info on the 2003 Bilderberg meeting yet. I know its a long way off, but I am just curious as to where it will be located at this year.

Also, if anyone could get a hold of a nuke, I'd glady become a kamikaze and run as close to the location of the next Bilderberg meeting, and BOOM! I bet the media would pick that sh*t up, eh? Plus, I'd be doing the world a huge favor!

[Edited on 22-12-2002 by Doomsday]

posted on Dec, 25 2002 @ 06:11 PM
hell id do it if i knew, if that didn't work id vut of all there heads

posted on Dec, 25 2002 @ 06:18 PM
BTW nice day to edit the post 22nd december

posted on Dec, 26 2002 @ 01:05 AM
? What are you talking about ?

posted on Dec, 26 2002 @ 03:44 AM
I don't think the Bilderburgers out right exist anymore. They were primarily composed of European royalty, and well as we all can see, there is no more European royalty, and I can hardly see the Queen of England and the prince of Lichtenstien ruling the world

no signature


posted on Dec, 26 2002 @ 02:34 PM

and the Nuke idea is not very nice.

posted on Dec, 26 2002 @ 05:57 PM
Actually the Bilderbergs might not exist anymore, but the meetings do. If you want press info about the last meeting in Virginia in 2002, check this site:

posted on Dec, 26 2002 @ 10:42 PM
Doomsday, the owner of the website announced the meeting to the media and urged them to investigate.

So they did. Guess what: No high security (there were rooms available to rent in the hotel that weekend.) No armed goons running around. The hotel knew nothing about the meeting (I think that if you had investigated closely enough, you'd have found the list of "attendees/key players" were often elsewhere on that day.) BBC (or maybe it was NPR) had a good chuckle over this.

I believe this public embarrassment and proof that the meeting was imaginary was the cause of his not chasing any more of these so-called meetings.

posted on Dec, 27 2002 @ 04:40 AM
? What are you talking about ?



the day of the world end according to mayans

posted on Dec, 27 2002 @ 12:04 PM
Just ten more years till doomsday!

Damned Mayans...

Seriously though, if such meetings do take place, I'm sure they're now at residences owned by one or more of the members...much easier to secure, and can use the cover of a fancy party...

posted on Dec, 27 2002 @ 03:41 PM

From reports, yes there was security at the 2002 Bilderberg meeting, mostly provided by FBI Secret Service and White House Security Staff. Also, I doubt that you could get a room at the Westfields Marriott.

Quote from Byrd - "The hotel knew nothing about the meeting (I think that if you had investigated closely enough, you'd have found the list of "attendees/key players" were often elsewhere on that day.) "

This is news to me. I haven't been able to find anything that supports your statements.

This link will support my statements from the site:

Raven1907 - I did not know that the Mayans thought that day was to be the end of the world. Damned Mayans!

posted on Dec, 27 2002 @ 07:04 PM
I believe that they found some correlation in the Great Pyramid that basically stated the Egyptians also believed the world would end in 2012...something about the number of steps, etc. It was on one of those TLC or Discovery Documentaries...

posted on Dec, 27 2002 @ 11:06 PM
The BBC report with everyone saying, "we never heard of this" is linked on this page:

I'm amused that the writer blames the cover story on a "wedding"... when a real wedding did take place there.

I see the link to the Yahoo News Page by Peter Starck. What I *don't* see is it appearing in the archives or anywhere else... EXCEPT on "Bilderberg" pages. Although it claims to be a Reuters story, it's not in the Reuters archives.

posted on Dec, 28 2002 @ 02:08 PM
First off, the media has had the Bilderberg meetings pulled from their agenda back in the late 80's. There hasn't been any major media or newspaper really cover anything from the Bilderberg meetings since then. Most of the coverage is done from freelance and reporters who have personal interest in covering those meetings.

Secondly, of course Hotel personal at the Westfield Marriott are going to deny any "event taking place." Just like all the other locations in the past, the hotel personel are going to deny any event or secret meeting of any kind to stop any public knowledge of what is going on. The less there is tell about a secret group having a meeting, the less the media will want to cover it.

Third, off the website from, they say that "information comes from a Propaganda visitor who tried to sneak in." Would you like for me to tell you a STORY on how I tried to sneak in as well? Some of the elite probably did tell their staff that they would be away for the weekend at a wedding, which is nothing new. And if there was a wedding there that same weekend, what better way to draw attention elsewhere. When Bill Clinton attended the 1991 Bilderberg meeting, he told his staff that he was taking a vacation in Germany for a few days. Later, the Washington Post stated that Gov. Bill Clinton had attended meetings in Germany.

I don't know where you live Bryd, but I do know that in the US and most main world news are one sided and seemed to be controlled by other sources. We live in an age that its almost impossible to tell truth from fiction and vice versa.

posted on Dec, 30 2002 @ 10:57 PM
I live in the US and I've read some of the reports, and I say they're bogus because:

Up until 1992 or so, they had a "perfect" track record. Everything they said they were going to do, they apparently accomplished -- no matter how obscure, including manipulating Bill Clinton's career and getting Bush senior to front for him.

They even, according to these reports, engineered the US elections so that Clinton would win. 100% goal achievement.

Then in 1995 or so, if you search the archives, the Bilderbergers suddenly fail all their agendas.

In 1995 they were supposed to coerce the Vietnam government into admitting that they had some POWs, finding a high ranking officer to blame on it, and executing the officer.

They were going to pressure the USSR to sign over oil and gas rights for very cheap so that the Bilderbergs could earn a lot more money.

A third "regional government" was to be formed in the Pacific Rim, and the UN is to be the seat of the world government. Had a look at the Pacific Rim lately? They've had 8 years to put through that agenda... they were hitting all their targets at 100% before 1995.

In 1996 they were supposed to engineer the breakup of Canada and Ontario becoming a part of the US in 2003 (now postponed till 2005.) Ah yes, and there was the GRAND CANAL project... suddenly dropped... then postponed till 2005. It was a "done deal", too.

Ah yes... and the US was to get on board with the environmental program and start paying for the cleanup of third world countries. They've had 8 years and 2 adminstrations on that one... zip, zilch, nada.

And yet they had a *perfect* track record before.

And let's take a gander at the announced schedule of 1999 from this "we are taking over the world and there's nothing you can do about it" group:

>Global governance, including a review on the progress in
> the formation of an Asian bloc under the leadership of Japan; The
> Kosovo war, including the formation of an "independent" Kosovo; The
> ultimate replacement of NATO with a Western European Army and the
> appointment of a Y2K (Year 2000) Czar (Mikhail Gorbachev could be a
> front runner for this post) to oversee global passage through the Y2K
> Emergency which they feel will be much worse than expected.

I must have slept through the Bilderbergs making all that happen.

...and so on and so forth. If they were real and powerful and exactly what was claimed, howcome their track record is dead-on perfect for the first 8-10 years or so and then suddenly they can't even organize a pencil cup?

A group that supposedly engineered the arrival of Bush Sr into the White House and then Clinton and then Shrub... why, they could do anything. Cause Ontario to seceed from Canada and the western parts of Canada to join the US. Right?

And yet their track record on this issue is an abysmal failure.

And why is it such a failure? Either the group is imaginary OR the group is real but the "reporter" is making up things about what they're doing.

top topics


log in