Originally posted by lostineuphoria
What about the argue that all the camera's were taken away?
Or the size of the hole doesnt match up with the wing span of the plane?
Are those questions credible or have they too been de-bunked?
No, they're good questions, and though, like so many people--I've no idea what actually happened at the Pentagon (and right there that's a good
reason to point out to your Dad--why haven't we seen clear-cut evidence?), they aren't easily dismissed.
There's a thread here that's about 260 pages long on this question. Well, there are about 2 or 3 threads on this site as long, and that says
something right there.
Why haven't we seen any of the videos from the Pentagon, and those the FBI was frantically collecting from security cameras of buildings immediately
around the crash site, while the building was still in flames?
Why did the clocks and watches found inside the wreckage of the Pentagon stop minutes before the reported impact time, and why was the impact time
fudged to bring the times into alignment?
Why did the plane hit the only side of the bldg that was reinforced? Where the accountants and Navy special ops people were? Accountants > does it
have anything to do with Rumsfeld's announcement before the Senate on Sept. 10 that the Pentagon couldn't account for $2.4 trillion of its budget?
Navy spies > about the most effective ones of all; what did they know, or what message was being sent to them?
Why didn't the plane just dive into the building from above? Easy-like? Why the amazing maximum-speed acrobatics from a hijacker who could barely fly
Why was the lawn immaculate? How did the plane clip 4 or 5 light poles, suck one light assembly into its starboard engine, and still manage to remain
stable and skim bare feet above the lawn on final approach?
Why didn't the FBI bother to legally
confirm the plane was the plane it was claimed to be?
Why doesn't the flight data recorder information add up? Why did the pilot reset his altitude co-ordinates barely minutes before impact in official
fashion if he's an Arab terrorist about to kill himself? Is this top on your mind in these situations? Would he even know how to do it, or care?
Where are those wings, and those tail assemblies? Or markings of them on the facades?
Why did Rumsfeld later say that a missile had hit the Pentagon? Misspoke, disinfo, or Freudian slip?
Why, in the end, don't we have answers to all this? If it was as it was reported to be, why don't we see the proof?
[edit on 21-3-2008 by gottago]