Radar Absorbent Material, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 22-2-2004 @ 03:27 AM by Spectre
Are they still using tiles of Radar Absorbent Material on the F-117? They were attached to its skin with adhesive and the gaps filled with special paint, but I read somewhere that the newer low-observable planes just use the paint -maybe “coating” is a better term- which can be "touched up" to preserve their low radar cross section if it gets chipped or otherwise damaged.

In one interesting online article I found it says that maintenance crews at Holloman Air Force Base do use strips of RAM to cover up the landing gear and conduct a radar evaluation of the individual planes to see what needs to be fixed. This creates a scenario where each aircraft has unique stealth characteristics. Seems not all black jets are created equal. Or maybe they were, but some have led rougher lives than others.

What exactly is “Radar Absorbent Material” anyway?

The information I find online seems to be pretty outdated. That’s pretty amazing considering that TV images and still photographs of the wreckage of a Nighthawk (F-117A #82-0806 downed near Belgrade, Yugoslavia in 1999) being picked over by civilians made it into the mainstream press. Plus, it has been in the operational inventory for at least 15 years. The most I can find is that the structural RAM is an “advanced composite” which does say much. Not being a materials scientist by any stretch, the only guess I could make is carbon fiber/epoxy blended with some sort of ferrite to make it bounce radar signals around inside the structure, a concept that dates back to the “Iron Ball” coating on the SR-71.

Heaven and the USAF only know what advances have been made in exotic RAM technology since the days of` “Iron Ball” paint (C-144). The F/A-22 is said to have these once supremely expensive materials on the most reflective surfaces, such as the leading edges of the wings, the bulk (by weight) of the airframe being titanium and aluminum. Since they are going to be produced in respectable numbers, along with the stealthy F-35 Joint Strike Fighter and RH-66 Comanche helicopter, the cost may have come down, too.

Maybe one day I will be able to afford enough to have the front of my car painted with RAM.

1.
www.af.mil...
2.www.boeing.com...


reply posted on 27-2-2004 @ 02:20 PM by usafairmen
Originally posted by Spectre
In one interesting online article I found it says that maintenance crews at Holloman Air Force Base do use strips of RAM to cover up the landing gear and conduct a radar evaluation of the individual planes to see what needs to be fixed. This creates a scenario where each aircraft has unique stealth characteristics. Seems not all black jets are created equal. Or maybe they were, but some have led rougher lives than others.


I was stationed at Holloman AFB from late August 01 until mid September 02. In the frist part of my tour there I worked right on the flightline every morning doing checks on AAS, check my webpage to find out what that is. I got to watch, and saluate alot of pilots of the 117 as they rocketed down the runway, standing less than 200ft from the runway center line. Never got close enough to wear I can touch them.

I will say this however, with the conditions they fly under at HAFB, do a google search on it to see the area, and you can wonder why they are so worried about the radar signature. It is very possible for each aircraft to have a slightly different amout of radar absorbing capabilites do to all the sand that does fly up from White Sands.

As far as using RAM around landing gear and bomb hatches, I wouldnt expect the AF to have it any other way. If it wasnt coated and designed in the same way the rest of the plane, once the get ready to drop a bomb, opps I am visible on radar. Hence they use the RAM and modify the doors to have the same type of radar deflection patern the aircraft does.

How RAM really works? You will have to find a engineer who works with the # to be exact.


reply posted on 10-3-2004 @ 06:17 AM by ghost
Originally posted by Spectre
Are they still using tiles of Radar Absorbent Material on the F-117? They were attached to its skin with adhesive and the gaps filled with special paint, but I read somewhere that the newer low-observable planes just use the paint -maybe “coating” is a better term- which can be "touched up" to preserve their low radar cross section if it gets chipped or otherwise damaged.

In one interesting online article I found it says that maintenance crews at Holloman Air Force Base do use strips of RAM to cover up the landing gear and conduct a radar evaluation of the individual planes to see what needs to be fixed. This creates a scenario where each aircraft has unique stealth characteristics. Seems not all black jets are created equal. Or maybe they were, but some have led rougher lives than others.

What exactly is “Radar Absorbent Material” anyway?

The information I find online seems to be pretty outdated. That’s pretty amazing considering that TV images and still photographs of the wreckage of a Nighthawk (F-117A #82-0806 downed near Belgrade, Yugoslavia in 1999) being picked over by civilians made it into the mainstream press. Plus, it has been in the operational inventory for at least 15 years. The most I can find is that the structural RAM is an “advanced composite” which does say much. Not being a materials scientist by any stretch, the only guess I could make is carbon fiber/epoxy blended with some sort of ferrite to make it bounce radar signals around inside the structure, a concept that dates back to the “Iron Ball” coating on the SR-71.

Heaven and the USAF only know what advances have been made in exotic RAM technology since the days of` “Iron Ball” paint (C-144). The F/A-22 is said to have these once supremely expensive materials on the most reflective surfaces, such as the leading edges of the wings, the bulk (by weight) of the airframe being titanium and aluminum. Since they are going to be produced in respectable numbers, along with the stealthy F-35 Joint Strike Fighter and RH-66 Comanche helicopter, the cost may have come down, too.

Maybe one day I will be able to afford enough to have the front of my car painted with RAM.

1.
www.af.mil...
2.www.boeing.com...


Well first of all there are many types of Radar Absorbing Materials out there. They vary from big flexable sheets that are like a thick foil textured materal that is non-metallic to a special paint coating.
Basiclly what RAM is comes down to this:
Ram is composed mainly of nonmetallic material imbedded with with magnetic praticals that convert radar energy into heat and then transfer the heat to the aircraft (or vehical) to avoid creating a detectable heat signature.

Tim
ATS Director of Counter-Ignorance


reply posted on 4-4-2004 @ 10:25 PM by nightwing
The design of RAM, and in particular, specular RAM is a design of single or
multilayer lossy dielectrics with specified scattering properties. While the loss
mechanisms through which RAM operates are on the atomic and crystal lattice levels
(microscopic), it is best to understand how it operates by taking a classical transmission
line approach for calculating the reflection and transmission properties of RAM.
For those with an electrical engineering background, RAM is simply the design
of a lossy distributed network which matches the impedance of free space to that
of a conducting body to be shielded.
Selecting the components of RAM is based on the fact that some things absorb
energy from electromagnetic fields that pass thru them. These things have indices
of refraction which are complex numbers. It is the imaginary component which
accounts for the loss and is analogous to the way a resistor converts electrical
current to heat.
Radar absorbers are loosely classified as "resonant" or "broadband". Thus "resonant"
RAM is effective only for a discreet frequency or a set of discreet frequencies. Broadband
RAM is effective over an entire band of frequencies. Anechoic chambers are not a good
example of flight RAM as this is the geometric transition approach to RAM where
volume is not a constraint.
It is difficult to achieve the bandwidths desired of microwave radar absorbers
(typically 2-18GHz) using a single-layer absorber so much of the work in this area
is in designing multiple layers based upon bandwidth specifications. If you want
to get familiar with the background necessary to work in this area, you can start
by studying Salisbury Screens and Dallenbach Layers. The bandwidth of a Salisbury screen
can be improved by adding additional resistive sheets and spacers to form a Jaumann absorber.
By varying the resistivity of the sheets, you enter the realm of graded dielectric absorbers.
Usually, commercial graded dielectric absorbers are constructed of discreet layers with
unique properties for each layer. If you wanted to play with some of this stuff,
you might see if AN-74 is still available from Emerson and Cuming. It is a 3 cm thick
three layered foam absorber that specs 20 db RCSR down to 3.5 GHz. To try this on
your car, you would smoothly cover your HEADLIGHTS, which are the singularly
brightest front aspect radar speculars on your vehicle. This would almost cut a typical
police radar detection range in half. (Front aspect only) But do not blame this post if you get fined.

1. Most states have fines for interfering with police radar, and the Judge will
not engage in the math arguments of passive versus active interferance.

2. This RAM treatment has NO EFFECT on IR Beam Speed Detectors.

3. Covering your headlights at night would be to advertise your ignorance, and other fines
would apply as well.


This is just touching on the subject, which with diligent research, can be found
in university libraries. A full coverage of RAM types would not be possible
in an unclassified format. So I will stop short of Magnetic RAM, circuit analog
absorbtion, and selective surface element geometries.

REF ::

1. W.W. Salisbury, "Absorbent Body for Electromagnetic Waves"

2. T.M. Connolly and E.J. Luoma, "Microwave Absorbers"

3. "Eccosorb H, Hair Type, Broadband Microwave Absorber", Technical Bulliten 8-21,
Emerson and Cuming, Jan 1973


/\/ight\/\/ing


reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 08:56 PM by nightwing
Spectre, the number two reference is available online ::

patft.uspto.gov.../netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=4038660.WKU.&OS=PN/4038660&RS=PN/ 4038660


I forgot the classic nature of number one, it dates back to 1943. Might not be easy to find, even though its a classic. I will look for another place you can find it.

/\/ight\/\/ing
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Eerie Second World War RAF fighter plane discovered in the Sahara
  Posted 15 days ago with 8 member flags
Stealth chopper based in Nevada
  Posted 15 days ago with 4 member flags
HIFiRE Scramjet Research Flight Will Advance Hypersonic Technology
  Posted 13 days ago with 2 member flags

ATS Live North America is broadcasting in 15 minutes.
Today's Show: ATS Live: 111: Timothy Good Interview, Hip Hop, Martial Law, Net woes, Civil War, Turbo's.....