Secret Life of Plants, page 5


Pages: <<  2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 30 times


reply posted on 13-11-2009 @ 06:30 AM by kiwitina948
reply to post by jaamaan



There is a book called The Celestine Prophecy which details experiments where people direct Energy Thoughts towards certain plants and those plants flourish, and then there is a 'control' group of plants where different Energy Thoughts are projected towards the plants and those plants do not flourish. I'm pretty sure the author is James Redfield, or maybe James Readfield. It's basically a non-fiction book in the form of a fictional story.

Even water is Energy and is affected by emotions, or thoughts. Plants, animals, humans, vegetation, water; Everything is Energy, so everything is affected by thoughts. My .02cents worth.

Nikola Tesla was done a major injustice. He wanted to provide free Energy for everyone, but due to greed for money by others, and desire of exploitation by the dark forces, he was denied sharing his discoveries. Sorry, just looking at Energy from another perspective as well. All of these concepts and ideas are also on abovetopsecret.com

Research them and learn as much as you can and pass your knowledge and learnings on, to as many people as you can. Wake people up!!

[edit on 13-11-2009 by kiwitina948]

[edit on 13-11-2009 by kiwitina948]


reply posted on 13-11-2009 @ 05:46 PM by jaamaan
reply to post by missvicky



Interesting connection that you had with your plant.
There quite some researchers that believe their experiments prove that plants can read your emotions.
Here is one, Marcel Vogel.


It was at this time that he read an article in Argosy magazine entitled “Do Plants Have Emotions?” about the work of polygraph expert Cleve Backster into the responsiveness of plants to human interaction.
Despite initial rejection of the concept of human-plant communication, he decided to explore these strange claims.

He was able to duplicate the Backster effect of using plants as transducers for bio-energetic fields that the human mind releases, demonstrating that plants respond to thought.
He used split leaf philodendrons connected to a Wheatstone Bridge that would compare a known resistance to an unknown resistance.
He learned that when he released his breath slowly there was virtually no response from the plant.
When he pulsed his breath through the nostrils, as he held a thought in mind, the plant would respond dramatically. It was also found that these fields, linked to the action of breath and thought, do not have a significant time domain to them.
The responsiveness of the plants to thought was also the same whether eight inches away, eight feet, or eight thousand miles! Based on the results of the experiments the inverse square law does not apply to thought.

www.vogelcrystals.net...




reply posted on 29-11-2010 @ 06:27 AM by missvicky
reply to post by Epipactis



I love your poem! It's beautiful.
I was so upset that my fern died because it was so sad. I still miss that fern.


reply posted on 29-11-2010 @ 06:33 AM by missvicky
Originally posted by jaamaan
reply to
post by missvicky



Interesting connection that you had with your plant.
There quite some researchers that believe their experiments prove that plants can read your emotions.
Here is one, Marcel Vogel.


It was at this time that he read an article in Argosy magazine entitled “Do Plants Have Emotions?” about the work of polygraph expert Cleve Backster into the responsiveness of plants to human interaction.
Despite initial rejection of the concept of human-plant communication, he decided to explore these strange claims.

He was able to duplicate the Backster effect of using plants as transducers for bio-energetic fields that the human mind releases, demonstrating that plants respond to thought.
He used split leaf philodendrons connected to a Wheatstone Bridge that would compare a known resistance to an unknown resistance.
He learned that when he released his breath slowly there was virtually no response from the plant.
When he pulsed his breath through the nostrils, as he held a thought in mind, the plant would respond dramatically. It was also found that these fields, linked to the action of breath and thought, do not have a significant time domain to them.
The responsiveness of the plants to thought was also the same whether eight inches away, eight feet, or eight thousand miles! Based on the results of the experiments the inverse square law does not apply to thought.

www.vogelcrystals.net...



I thought it was strange as I experienced it my self. In the beginning I'm thinking this is wierd .... but REAL. So I just went with it. It's like alot of stuff here on ATS...ask me for proof? Can't do it. But it was a real relationship nevertheless. You know what you know. And it's been 10 years and I still miss that fern.


reply posted on 17-2-2013 @ 05:20 AM by GRS1234
reply to post by Wifibrains



very cool subject op ty for your contribution
mother and father are very forgiving wifi one day we will have it all this belief i hold dear
edit on 17-2-2013 by GRS1234 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 17-2-2013 @ 05:24 AM by GRS1234
reply to post by thenormalkidwantingtobesm



Originally posted by thenormalkidwantingtobesm
This is very interesting but how can one believe in this? I mean plants have the ability to feel pain and experience pleasure this is very arguable. I personably have not got a lot of knowledge about this but why has this not been widely publicised?


thats kinda an ironic statement to put on a conspiracy forum isnt it? lol just sayn
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



California going off!
  Posted 16 days ago with 146 member flags
Ice Age Flower Blooms After 32000 Years!
  Posted 15 days ago with 79 member flags
Experts Warn Mount Fuji is Dangerously Close to Erupting
  Posted 5 days ago with 66 member flags
Man building his own island out of plastic bottles
  Posted 12 days ago with 59 member flags
Simple way to discover if your produce is GMO.
  Posted 2 days ago with 46 member flags