y'all keep going on about da nwo but y'all forget about its leader the antichrist(who is he?)

possible candidates prince william , charles, next ruler of iraq jfk(a clone) requirements name must equate to 666 in hebrew, must have a fierce countenance/look, um will come from among a group/union of countries(E.U.? U.N.? most likely E.U.) must not seem evil(he will decieve the world,he'll show his true colors mid-way into the 7year tribulation) whatch y'all think?

ya'll straight trippin boo

[Edited on 22-2-2004 by thebeagle]

Where did you get all that fancy information?

its in revelations, read it(his fierce countenance, little horn,etc) i thought ignorance had no place here (directed at above poster)

[Edited on 22-2-2004 by retardedgenius]

prince william and charles have fierce looks? i thought it was more of that "i just got hit by a car in minnesota look

EU president when they establish more federal system?
Or Romano Prodi, or the one after him?
It can happen in 1000 years for all we know..

[Edited on 22-2-2004 by Megaquad]

i dont think it was ignorance....i think they were just aking a simple question about that fancy info...

oh, and i dont think they talk about clones of jfk in revelations...


haha, sorry man im just tryin to give you a hard time

A fierce countenance?

Perhaps he could be a wolf in sheep’s clothing. The fierce descriptions could be his true nature, but on the outside he would be the perfect diplomat. It would make his deception much more deceptive.

I've read somewhere that it was the King of Spain.

If you're determined to have one then I nominate Lord Rothschild. He'd make a terrific bad guy.

Maybe the leader of this forever-coming NWO is someone from our far future (who after having their mortality gene removed) was sent back into our distant past with the mission to shape society (over an extended period of time; thousands of years) in such a way as to achieve some "ideal agenda", or something, to change "events" of the future in some way...

My understanding is that the true manifestation has not yet been achieved but that several willing and capable vessels have been offered up for the taking of the dark spirit.

Sorry, I'm probably one of the few, but I don't really believe in the Book of Revelation. How this "dream" got to be so important to be put in the Bible and as the last book seems suspicious. Why didn't Jesus just tell us what to expect when he was alive...why have someone else tell us in a manner that 1) Sounds like a drug trip 2) Leaves us with riddles?


I know this book keeps some Christians "in line" for fear of the future so they are always devout and on guard for evil (which isn't always bad), and maybe that is the sole purpose of the book and why it was placed in the Bilble.


I think the only chance for an anti-christ is one that controls a religion: Islam and Christianity would be my two bets since they like to go off on their self-righteous ways at times. Relgious leaders are the ones that can summon up the most illogical passion in followers to do some of the most hideous things..."for the love of God shall give birth to the devil" Book of Boogie 2:22:04

the ten horns do not represent countries. the ten horns will give their power to the little horn which may be the anti-christ. a clue to the little horns identy is that he would be rumored to be homosexual ...ring any bells? blood lines perhaps?

no, seriously, he's straight trippin boo!

and he will come up with few men, and sieze teh kingdom by intrigue.

the insteadof christ is lucifer. his pride would not allow anything else.

he has a fierce countenance and is highly charismatic.

whoever he is the jews must think he's the messiah,
could it be maitreya?