It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FredT
Your link is not working (at least for me)
www.marketwatch.com...
FlightGlobal.com affiliate FlightBlogger today reports that an attempt to reduce the weight of the Boeing 787 has caused a costly redesign for the centre wing box.
Boeing engineers previously changed the centre wing box design to save weight by thinning out the density of the spars.
However, Flightblogger reports, that move backfired after the company learned the redesign could trigger premature buckling of the load-bearing spars
Originally posted by waynos
A question does occur though. Are the likes of Udvar Hazy and Tim Clark now wielding too much influence and effectively being the tail wagging the dog? Both manufacturers now seem to be struggling to meet possibly unrealistic demands from the airline bosses, has the commercial return possible from big airliners now reached a plateau?
Interesting times.
Originally posted by Harlequin
Bombadier and Embraer seem to do being well on `lets make a plane and deliver it on time`
Originally posted by waynos
Ya know, with all that 'Airbust' rubbish we went through last year, would I be justified in referring to 'Boo-ing' from now on?
Originally posted by kilcoo316
Marketing idiots like John Leahy making idiotic promises that no real engineer would make.
...
i.e. its not accurate, and never can be accurate - but idiots (like John Leahy) promise solutions based on these predictions - without considering the impossible to know error margins.
Originally posted by FredT
Now can Airbus keep to the A350 schedule? They diverted alot of resources to fix the A380 wiring issue.
I also think they will have some upcomming union trouble over the KC-45.
Originally posted by Canada_EH
talking about did they ever treally commmit to it till last year kilcoo?
Originally posted by RichardPrice
Yup, that Leahy is a total idiot all right. Never mind that Leahy managed to sell over 200 copies of an aircraft that apparently no one wanted (the original A350).
Never mind that in just 20 months, Leahy managed to sell over 350 copies of an aircraft that apparently cannot compete with the 787 (the A350XWB).
Originally posted by RichardPrice
Never mind that Leahy managed to sell as many A330F aircraft in just a single year that the 777F has managed in over 3 years.
Never mind that in the worst three years of Airbuses life, when they were paying through the nose for delays and uncertainty (A380 and A350), Leahy has managed to sell over 3,500 aircraft.
Never mind that in a year when practically every single aviation analyst was predicting a massive downturn in aircraft sales, Leahy has managed to sell over 350 aircraft in the first two months.
For an idiot, he sure seems to be someone I would want running my sales team.
Originally posted by RichardPrice
Actually I think Airbus have an extremely good chance of keeping to the A350 schedule - thats why they gave themselves 7 years while Boeing only scheduled 4 years (April 2004 launch to May 2008 EIS, by the original schedule).
Also, 'engineers' is rather a broad term, the type of engineers working on the A380 wiring problems almost certainly would not be involved in defining the A350XWB structure and aerodynamics et al.
Originally posted by RichardPrice
Again, I am doubtful that the unions will actually have much to say on the matter - Airbus is moving work that currently is not in existence to America, so its not as if the KC-45 and A330F assembly in Mobile is taking away from European jobs.