It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by youvegotbighands
Ehh I did not read most of the replys on this thread, but there are a few reasons why these images are not valid "proof of life" on Mars.
A lot of the pictures were taken REALLY HIGH UP so those structures in the images we see are most likely a few miles wide. Case: that giant face on Mars, you know that really famous mound whose name escapes me, turned out to be 3 miles long
Finding rocks like that on Earth does not make people think that they are from ancient ruins, the thing that distinguishes between common rocks and rocks from ruins is the fact that the ones from ruins have evidences of having been artificially altered.
Originally posted by iammonkey
Why is it when we find pictures like this on earth no one questions that it’s an ancient ruin. Yet just by saying, it is on mars it is brushed off.