Evidence Of Ancient Life On Mars?

reply to post by earth2

---

Thanx earth2. There's, as you said, more 'stuff' in this image like....



Like a bunny!! But needless to say, this is nothing but a rock! Would you like to see a 'moving' duck? Here it is...


Pic Courtesy: toledoconnection

Is this a Martian duck??? I wonder how they taste!!

Ancient life? Heck! We could be looking at present life!

Cheers!


www.toledoconnection.com...




[edit on 26-3-2008 by mikesingh]

with the black and white picture

i think it is just an object that looks different becuase the camera that is taking the photo is moving so each time the photo is taken the image is different

its a different angle becuase the camera is moving around the object the camera is taking pictures of

reply to post by mikesingh

---

As usual, that is not new on ATS.

It was already posted at least once, here, and I think that most people agreed that it was a part of the heat shield.

That is also my opinion.

I sent this in a U2U to Mike, but I thought it might fit in here too.

I was looking over this image:

Spirit Panoramic Camera Sol 1497

When this familiar snake like shape came up.

Ya lets hear from the de-bunkers again about "Well, if these things were mass produced we should find more than one of the same thing.".

Well you asked for it....



Compair this to Mike's "Marsmachine5" and 4 they are the 3rd & 4th to the last pictures in the OP.

Ok, not exact, but how close does it have to be? This 'S' shape looks a lot like the air intake to the airfilter in a car's engine, opening and all, the little thing left of it has 3 little holes right next together. Just under the S shape is a perfect little square, and belwo that is the foot print of the 'Martian' who must have put them there (lol J/K). Don't worry I'm sure they are all just rocks.

There are other things near by in the original, but I knew even this would be a stretch around here!

EDIT to add diffrent photo, and add to dicription.

[edit on 28-3-2008 by HellHound63S]

reply to post by HellHound63S

---

I only have one question.

Where do you see the "familiar snake-like shape"?

reply to post by ArMaP

---

Dude, if you REALLY can't see it I truely feel sorry for you, in trying so hard to "deny ignorance" your denying a hell of a lot more. How can you NOT see it plane as day? Most of art's apeal is based on imagination, it takes SOME abstract thought to see a flat canvas resembles a 3D subject. The Mona-Lisa doesn't resemble a woman at all to a robot for instance.

Open your mind a little, it won't fall out I promise! My friend who thinks its all BS, like you, could see this one, so could my Dad with out his glasses even.

Truely I feel for you, your world must be extremely drab, I'm sorry.

Well, here it is ZOOMED in, and traced it too I even think it looks like a martian bass now. I like it better plain without my crappy traceing, I don't have the tint ability like Mike.

reply to post by HellHound63S

---

Hi HH! That was a good find!
Good work. Keep it up! What I've shown below is NOT the original image. I've modified it by adding some color, sharpness, contrast etc so as to highlight the object. Looks like a piece of bone, what?? But then even weird looking rocks are rocks!! Bones on Mars?? Naaaaah!



Cheers!


[edit on 29-3-2008 by mikesingh]

You missed the snake about several inches above the O and F of. The small Yoda looking character is in the upper left of photo @ 9:30 several inches from the word Top. There are plenty more anomalies in this photo. Rik Riley



[edit on 29-3-2008 by rikriley]

Do you know why I did not saw it? Because to me those look like two (or even three) different objects, not one.

Yes, but this is not supposed to be art, this is supposed to be an objective analysis of what we see. If we use too much imagination we can start seeing things that aren't really there and, for example, create a 3D object from what in reality is just different coloured ground.

But you are right in one thing, I have very little imagination, but I am aware of that.

There is no need for you to feel sorry for me, my world was always been my own and not dictated by other people, and I am used to it. It may be drab, but reality is also drab at times.

Interesting, but it may be a bit far reaching.

We can see all kinds of images in our own rock formations, and even our clouds. We may be doing that here.

What we need to see is silver metal with some right angles. Or detailed writing, or a full skeleton. Or various colors.

I'll keep the mind and eyes open, but I think its still a bit of a reach unfortunatly.

proof of giant kitty cats that used to roam the earth.



here's some of the ancient kings of earth from millions of years ago










heres the remains of an ancient lost city



maybe one of our ancient feline rulers

reply to post by iammonkey

---

i275.photobucket.com... I was aiming for the Lizard face between the 2 smooth jutting from sand objects.But another face came out better. The idea is that you have to see at least 1 face before you can believe someone else sees thousands. His nostrils are 2 small tubes in a spread "V" pattern. Spirit panorama I believe.

If you will go to the thread Mars, what the hell is going on? I will show you an identical letter black cursive E that was used just to the right of the rectangular opening as in your pic entitled heres the remains of an ancient city. It is the first pic you will see presented in that Mars thread. The same identical cursive letter E is in the rocks to the very right in your photo. Rik Riley

[edit on 7-4-2008 by rikriley]

reply to post by MGauntz

---

The famous heart on Mars I believe to be artificially created because it features the face of a Dragon etched in.Many Mars dragons have this triangular heart shaped head outline. Very few people will see it ,but only because they haven't seen hundreds of them in many shapes and sizes.

Here's the type of common dragon face on Mars with a triangle or heart-shaped face/head shape.This one is rather small with a head a foot high or less,like the size of a bottom of a gallon of milk. It's a fossil with eyes intact,and an exception to the rule of looking at the cam means most likely ALIVE. The eyes are in different directions,and the face emaciated. The purple dragon head artwork is to illustrate some of the larger long head dragons of mars closer to kamodo dragons of Earth. This small dragon,however is close to the style depicted in the "dragon heart" land formation pictured above,so I'm fairly sure it's artificial. The Mars Aliens with high tech tend to mark the land surface with broad strokes for high visibility as art and landmarks for flying ships. They may have brought their favorite animals along over the last million years as a zoo or sanctuary,outpost. I just don't know how long ago Mars lost most of its atmosphere in the last big catastrophic impact that caused die-offs and survival of the "small" like when Earth experienced the end of the large dinosaurs. Mass extinctions. For comparison a more human-looking dragon,that is ALIVE and therefore staring at the rover cam suspiciously is coser to human face size,and you can see the left eye staring.The right eye is bloced by an overlapping image of a tangerine -sized skull/face disembodied. You may ask how the smaller skull is in front of the eye and MORE VISIBLE ? That's because the moving LIVE beast MOVED.Let me repeat that because it's key to seeing Mars creatures live. The moving animals appear less clear because they MOVE. Why? because the still as a rock smaller skull stays the exact same position between overlapping frames and gets re-inforced as "STABLE",same place every frame.Think of very old time photography with slow shutter speeds.If the subject or camera moved,the resulting photo blurred. If you had an etch-a-sketch,you erased it by shaking it. If the animal moved between frames it got less FACE TIME and therefor a less crisp clear image rendered of it while the rocks got FULL FACE TIME. You move/you lose detail.....very simple.I designed this system in spring 1987. It's simplistic and it works. If Nasa hides images that what you need to know to defeat the system. It has always been my mission to find life on Mars.

I have to really bend over backwards with this heart shaped dragon face stuff because I realize to the everyday reader it sounds all too comical,good for a ribbing. I designed the Mars rovers 1987,original concept and drawings. The rovers found people,animals,fossils 2004.But really the Viking missions 1976 and Pathfinder 1997(my design) also found life because they were surrounded by live beings and covered up for 30+ years by Nasa.How could they pull the wool over your eyes for so long? Let me show you,because nasa will probably knock on your door or call you up tomorrow and explain....um,yeah. Look first for symetry,or wait to be spoonfed.

reply to post by HellHound63S

---

Here's some duality,Hellhound of the same pic you used.I compressed,squished,negative imaged it filtered details that you wouldn't look for ordinarily unless you already knew what the animals looked like. When I say the animals for 4 years have crowded around the rovers regularly,it's not idle chatter. They stand up like cobras. I try to remind everyone that the live ones all look straight at the rover/camera,and that's how you can tell they are living animals responding to a rover I designed to LOOK like another animal,as if it had a moving head with 2 EYES disguised cams S Y M E T R I C A L L Y mounted strategically to attract animals visually. I am a visual person who can think like an animal to attract them,like a hunter.How else would you find life on Mars?

reply to post by vze2xjjk

---

Good show vze with the photo- fossils with/eyes. No matter what you show thru photos on Mars there will still be doubters. The results of the Phoenix lander ought to be interesting landing near the North pole of Mars. This is where I believe micro organisms being discovered on Mars will be announced.

It is a shame that NASA did not send a rover to comb the N. Pole areas. You and I know the reason why they did not send a rover to the North Pole. Rik Riley

It's such a shame when you think about it.Lander instead of rover,landing rockets vs airbags. I was sitting back there in 1987 thinking..."if only Nasa could see these drawings,they'd see the simplest most basic way to safely land a rover with cameras 360 degrees and then some." Yes I realize there are bigger rovers in the works,and that's the best I could hope for. It will be interesting,whatever happens with the lander. My "Phoenix" was supposed to be an orbiter end of 2010 or beginning 2011.That was the last orbiter I requested. That would have made at least 4 orbiters around Mars instead of 3. Ever wonder why there are no more active Lunar Orbiters? Ok, there must be miliary secret orbiters up there,but that just means no info sharing with the public,so we are kept in the dark and fed like MUSHROOMS. I live near the MUSHROOM capital of the world. You can smell the manure from miles away. Are these friends of yours?

reply to post by vze2xjjk

---

The Mars critters came out to see and they said, Who Are You WHOOO
WHOOO WHOOO WHOOO I really want to know? LOL Very interesting looking faces but there are so many variations of lifeforms on Mars it isn't funny. Rik Riley