Ok first thing I will bring up is the dust storms on mars. The second thing is the fact that archiologists rarely find evidence of primitive advanced life on the surface of our planet why would mars be any different. If there is fossiles on mars odds are they would be 3 to 4 feet underground buried under the constant barrage of dust storms. Not laying in plain site for a sattelite or rover to take pics of, these are just rocks. Until we set foot on mars and start digging by hand we will never know what is really on that planet, anything else is pure speculation.

[edit on 23-3-2008 by Starwatcher]

Is it just me or does that pic of the "skull" in the third frame look EXACTLY like the famous starchild skull? Interesting find as usual, always fun to speculate S+F

Originally posted by Grizzly Bear
Is it just me or does that pic of the "skull" in the third frame look EXACTLY like the famous starchild skull? Interesting find as usual, always fun to speculate S+F

Hi Grizzly, is this what you mean?


The star child skeleton
Courtesy: Darkstar1


The object on Mars

Yes! The similarities are striking! But then the 'Starchild' skull could be nothing but a deformed human skull and that object on Mars just a rock!!

But it's best to have an open mind until there's proof one way or the other!

Cheers!

Cool pictures Mike! Are they really from Mars whose is to say now days. They very well could be and then again maybe not, but rather Earthbound pictures passed off as Martian.

But in reply to some of the other stuff commented on. We should not be fast to dismiss anything. Yes, while proof is hard, to prove them not the real deal would be just as hard possibly.

As for sand storms and such. We must not assume that Mars has been the way it is all along. Some have said, that Mars once was the sister to Earth and maybe even older. Again, can we trust what we are told...I sure do not know.

I find it interesting that often comments are made about Mars and other planets and moons as if we know what we are talking about as if we have been there or that we have some type of authority.

Who can say that civilization did not once live on Mars and that it may not have looked like us or did look like us? Who is not to say that some devastating even took place and wiped out the climate and left Mars barren and hostile. For that matter, how many of you can say for sure that our own planet was not at times in the past of its very own history supporting of life beyond the means of ourselves in these times?

So, cudo's to Mike for collecting these photos in a singular presentation. And if asked if they looked real or not. For it is up to the rest of us to decide for ourselves. But let's be careful how we look at them, cause I do not think that any of us are authority, unless you can prove the truth and history behind each one and where they come from, Mars or where.

great images mikesingh!!

i found them to be very thought provoking.

unfortunately all we have for now are just pictures, so while the objects could be skeletal remains, manufactured items and monuments, we will never know. until these things are physically examined and cataloged and have the results open to everyone, it remains just speculation.

personally i do hope they are real artifacts and not just light reflecting off stones. the ramifications of intelligent life so close to earth would really force everyone to rethink our place in the grand scheme of things.

i also do believe that perhaps we have some sort of connection with mars, perhaps earth was colonized. having read other forums, i have come across many who also do believe this.

until we have people and/or robots actually doing archaeologic surveys on mars surface, we can only dream and imagine what is really there.

I still think this look's like some kind of Jawbone.


[img][/img]

Originally posted by earth2
I still think this look's like some kind of Jawbone.

Interesting image earth2! Could you provide the original NASA image from where this was taken? Thanx.

Originally posted by plasmacutter
what about all the people burried that where six feet down??or old civilisation alredy burried ??

That's the trick. Even buried and turned up in the dirt or whatever, artifacts are generally associated with an organized site of some kind, not just scattered around randomly.

And wouldnt you agree ? that the very existence of us is an example that anything is pos???

Is it possible that leprechauns rode pink unicorns around the Martian hills, and they stopped to eat chocolate kisses that grew on the talking bushes there? I mean, if anything is possible...