What on earth landed on page 9? I've just seen 3 long posts of images illustrating who knows what? Kaleidoscopic images with outlines that don't outline anything. I read and re-read and have no idea if they are being satirical or really believe they prove something. Are they joking? Potato head creatures with spindly legs? Fanged heads? I've had many a WTF!? moment on ATS. I appreciate that we see different things in pixellated images. I respect the poster's interpretation, but they represent one of the biggest WTF?! moments for me.

[edit on 1-3-2009 by Kandinsky]

Here's the trade-off with 3D images. It helps see LIVE FACES because of OVERLAP. Yet the fuzziness is a little annoying. I compressed image Horizontally. While the cave aspect is reduced to highlight the LIVE faces,there will be more clarity for dead rock in normal B&W pics.No-one touches NEGATIVE images,so this would be missed by 99% of other researchers. The details of faces interest me more than conformity. I crave to see them looking at my rovers.

This is a reconstruction of a Mars Face.By using the right side of the face to use a similar to mirror image on the left side of face I worked to get around the interfering obstruction.I horizontally compressed to knock out secondary head shift overlap.

Why are the LIVE ones so hard to find,when they are "everywhere"? They are fuzzed out or blurred.

Female Foreground Face Mars in front of head. the body seems CATERPILAR with sharp spike "arms".

Here is what NASA wants you to believe: that there is water on Mars that can support single cell life, nothing more. That goes along with evolutionary theory. Anything else they find that suggests intelligent beings were on Mars discredits that theory and the scientists' world view.

These bones that are seen on Mars are spewn about all over the surface. If you were to walk around on Mars, you would think it was one vast graveyard. And you would be right. There was a great flood on Mars in the past that covered its whole surface and killed all life on Mars. Sound familiar? Well it should. The same type of global flood happened here on Earth at aproximately the same time Mars was flooding.

Originally posted by TC Mike
There was a great flood on Mars in the past that covered its whole surface and killed all life on Mars. Sound familiar? Well it should. The same type of global flood happened here on Earth at aproximately the same time Mars was flooding.

Or probably a great war on Mars many thousands of years ago?

With so much what looks like 'unnatural' stuff seen on Mars, it cannot be coincidence like natural rock formations etc formed by tectonic movement and weather conditions or even due to 'Marsquake' activity millions of years ago. That's what the common explanations of the 'experts' are!

Now these images, especially the ones shown below, don't seem to conform to the explanations of the 'experts'. Or they must explain how such geometric shapes with hollows etc can form in small stones....I've highlighted the word 'small' so that some don't come up with pics of hillocks and stone formations hundreds of feet high consisting of hollows and caves!





Cheers! The truth is out there!

Nice thread and "amazing" pics! Thanks Mike for posting here together.

I also was amazed by the ESA images. European Space Agency I suppose? Are they at odds with NASA at all?

My questions are (and not directed at Mike entirely).

1. Given that these shapes and rocks and anomalies are so amazingly different then anything we have on earth--why doesn't NASA spend some time trying to get closer pictures of them to not only prove/disprove some of the theories floating around but to get a better understanding of the over all geology of Mars and some of the processes there such as erosion to name just one? (Hows that for a run on sentence? lol!

2. There seems to be evidence of single cell organisms on Mars or at least the possibility for them to exist either now or in the past---what are the probabilites or statistics that said organisms might have "evolved" into sentient beings like us? And why is that such a hard concept to swallow? Why is that not even a consideration to skeptics?

3. Some of these pictures defy description and although I feel compelled to believe that most of them are just rocks and shadows and dust--some of them just seem to be too unique? too artificial? I think some good geological expertise is needed here to profer those arguements and expand on the this is just a rock reply. But why and how was it shaped like that?

4. Most pics I've seen on Mars here are from NASA are there any other great ESA or Russian mission pics that are also amazing?

Cheers!