Conditioning the masses to what is already occurring....
Category: News and Politics
There have been several news releases in the past several months which report that leading scientists are proposing the concept of global dimming via
geoengineering to create a sunscreen in the atmosphere to slow down global warming.
We believe that certain aspects of this concept are and have already been in practice for years now. As can be seen on our MySpace page and on our
website, Chemtrails911.com, most of the supporting evidence behind "chemtrails" points to the global dimming concept, which is a very dangerous and
Are these news stories now being released to test the public's reaction to these outrageous concepts?
Tom Wigley of the National Center for Atmospheric Research suggests inserting sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere to shade the planet. "The most
sensible way to get sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere would be to send numerous planes — more than the world's current commercial airline fleet
— to take it there." (MSNBC has since completely removed this article, but here is Google's cached page of it:
Nobel Prize-winning chemist Paul J. Crutzen also suggests dispersing sulfur particles into the stratosphere to create a sunscreen in order to slow
down global warming (pubs.acs.org...
Recently, "NASA's Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, Calif., hosted a closed-door, high-level workshop on the global haze proposal and other
'geoengineering' ideas for fending off climate change." The latest news article starts out: "If the sun warms the Earth too dangerously, the time
may come to draw the shade. The 'shade' would be a layer of pollution deliberately spewed into the atmosphere to help cool the planet" (Yahoo has
since completely removed this article, but here is Google's cached page of it:
:IurCopwLmcAJ:news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061116/ap_on_sc/saved_by_haze_1+%22). And the reaction to this crazy idea?
Well, Paul J. Crutzen states, "The reception on the whole is more positive than I thought". What?! This is ridiculous!
As we have stated on our website and on our MySpace page, this concept is not new and is not limited to a scientist or two. This concept is exactly
what well-known scientist Edward Teller, the father of the H-Bomb, called for in 1997 while at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories. In a
government sponsored report called Global Warming and Ice Ages, he suggested the scattering of 1 million tons of materials into the atmosphere in
order to reflect 1% of incoming sunlight. He states that it would be cheaper to slow global warming through "stratospheric deployment of oxide
particulates" than to actually slow down greenhouse gases connected with fossil-fired energy production.
The sunscreen concept is also called for in a major congressional study titled Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming, which was sponsored by the
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. This huge study was reported in 1992 and is the textbook
on greenhouse gasses, global warming, policy decisions and mitigations. In this study, they talk about using aircraft to spray the atmosphere with
stratospheric dust or soot to simulate clouds in order to mitigate global warming. The study also suggested dumping iron into the ocean to stimulate
plankton that could potentially eat carbon dioxide. By looking at Moss Landing Marine Laboratories' recent dumping of iron in the ocean to do just
that, you can see that these are not just theories. They are theories in actual use. But the iron theory backfired when a large amount of fish
Our children are now even being taught this aerial obscuration concept in our schools. In the level one science book, "Essential Interactions" by
Centre Point Learning, Inc., a photo of a jet is titled "Particle Air" and has the caption "Jet engines running on richer fuel would add particles
to the atmosphere to create a sunscreen". This is in the section titled "Solutions for Global Warming". In the same section they also show a
picture of a helicopter dumping iron into the ocean as a way to mitigate global warming, as we mentioned earlier. Again, CNN actually reported the
iron theory being carried out. These are not just theories.
There are even patents for devices to carry out this insane concept. One important patent is the 1994 Welsbach patent issued to the Hughes Aircraft
Co. It is for atmospheric spraying with aluminum oxide to reduce global warming by seeding and reflecting 1% of incoming sunrays. Another patent worth
mentioning is the 1975 US Navy patent, which is for a contrail generation apparatus for producing powder contrails. In the summary section it clearly
states the term 'contrail' was adopted for convenience in identifying the visible powder trail". It appears they are still using the word contrail
for convenience. The people carrying out these types of operations will never use the word chemtrails. They use terms such as aerial obscuration,
persistent contrails, sky soot, or sun shield/screen.
We ask that you please be aware of what is occurring in our skies and inform others of these dangerous operations. Share this information with your
friends, family, and co-workers. People sometimes love to dismiss this topic as some wing-nut conspiracy theory, but it can be hard for some people to
easily dismiss what is occurring when so many leading scientists and government sponsored studies provide evidence for what we have been saying all
Please remember, by the Air Force's own definition a decade or so ago, a normal contrail will last no longer than 30 minutes... and then only under
the best supporting weather conditions. So, the sky is available for all to watch. Please do so. Look up, wake up, and speak out! Thank you.