It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Photo-editing software gets more sophisticated all the time, allowing users to alter pictures in ways both fun and fraudulent. Last month, for example, a photo of Tibetan antelope roaming alongside a high-speed train was revealed to be a fake, according to the Wall Street Journal, after having been published by China's state-run news agency. Researchers are working on a variety of digital forensics tools, including those that analyze the lighting in an image, in hopes of making it easier to catch such manipulations.
Tools that analyze lighting are particularly useful because "lighting is hard to fake" without leaving a trace, says Micah Kimo Johnson, a researcher in the brain- and cognitive-sciences department at MIT, whose work includes designing tools for digital forensics. As a result, even frauds that look good to the naked eye are likely to contain inconsistencies that can be picked up by software.
Originally posted by NGC2736
On a conspiratorial note, I wonder how many images are faked for political or judicial purposes?
If you're the cops, and you're sure that Joe Shmoe is the guy holding up liquor stores around town, can you fake a store video to use as evidence?
Originally posted by NGC2736
If you're the cops, and you're sure that Joe Shmoe is the guy holding up liquor stores around town, can you fake a store video to use as evidence?
Originally posted by apc
"Even if the Apollo images and videos were faked, they would have been shot on a set... not edited in Photoshop!
Originally posted by IMAdamnALIEN
If you had a tool that lets you figure out light sources, wouldn't you be able to tell where lights were placed if used, and how many light sources exist in frame?
Originally posted by watch_the_rocks
This is a fun little test you can take: Fake or Photo?
I got every single one right, excluding one image in the bonus round. But I've been using photoshop for years, and can spot a fake pretty easily. Yes, the main thing is lighting. It is very very hard to replicate, I would say almost impossible without proper 3D software.