It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints is the most true church on earth.
According to The Book of Mormon, the family of Lehi (a wealthy Hebrew merchant and prophet), the family of Ishmael, and Zoram traveled from the Middle East circa 600 BC to the Americas by boat. Some time after the death of Lehi (in the Americas), Nephi (Lehi's fourth son) overheard that his brothers were plotting to kill him, so he (Nephi) and his followers left and went into the wilderness. The followers of Nephi called themselves Nephites, though made up of several groups, such as the Jospehites, Jacobites, and Zoramites. The followers of Laman (Lehi's oldest son) were called Lamanites, though made up of Ishmaelites, Lemuelites, and various other groups of Nephites.[1]
Thomas W. Murphy is a Latter Day Saint anthropologist and writer. Murphy earned his Ph.D. in anthropology from the University of Washington in 2003, and he is now the chair of the Department of Anthropology at Edmonds Community College in Washington State. Murphy concluded that "DNA research lends no support to traditional Mormon beliefs about the origins of Native Americans" and he has likened the Book of Mormon to inspirational fiction.
Why would polygamy be bad?
Smith was married to 23 other women along with Emma.
Evidence exists that at least nine of Joseph Smith's wives were civilly married to other men while being religiously sealed (married) to Joseph Smith. Additionally, sealings took place years after his death by proxy in the 1850s in Utah. Some Smith biographers state that the women Joseph Smith was sealed to but not civilly married to were practicing polyandry (the practice of a woman having more than one husband at one time),[60][61] however polyandry would require at least an attempt at a legal civil marriage. One writer even claims that, while most of these "polyandrous" marriages were with the first husband's consent, others were done behind the first husband's back.[62] The same writer states Smith used warnings of eternal damnation and promises of eternal rewards to secure consent to his proposals.
8 And behold, it is wisdom that this land should be kept as yet from the knowledge of other nations; for behold, many nations would overrun the land, that there would be no place for an inheritance.
13 Now the people which were not Lamanites were Nephites; nevertheless, they were called Nephites, Jacobites, Josephites, Zoramites, Lamanites, Lemuelites, and Ishmaelites.
14 But I, Jacob, shall not hereafter distinguish them by these names, but I shall call them Lamanites that seek to destroy the people of Nephi, and those who are friendly to Nephi I shall call Nephites, or the people of Nephi, according to the reigns of the kings.
part of a record, both sacred and secular, of prophets and peoples who (with supplementary groups) were among the ancestors of the American ”Indians.”
Originally posted by AshleyD
reply to post by enchantress62
The thing is, Christians have every right to have an opinion about things. Having an opinion on controversial subjects or being outspoken about things does not make one 'Unchristian.' Yes, we are told not to judge others. But we are also told to judge all things. Mormonism is a thing.
NEW YORK - Nearly all of today's Native Americans in North, Central and South America can trace part of their ancestry to six women whose descendants immigrated around 20,000 years ago, a DNA study suggests.
Those women left a particular DNA legacy that persists to today in about about 95 percent of Native Americans, researchers said.
The finding does not mean that only these six women gave rise to the migrants who crossed into North America from Asia in the initial populating of the continent, said study co-author Ugo Perego.
The women lived between 18,000 and 21,000 years ago, though not necessarily at exactly the same time, he said.
The finding does not mean that only these six women gave rise to the migrants who crossed into North America from Asia in the initial populating of the continent, said study co-author Ugo Perego.
A person among this board stated that men will have unlimited sex in Heaven. First i must say, does that sound like a bad thing? As i see the world as proof, i would believe people would be rejoicing, as it is evident humans love procreation considering the vast population upon the world... As it stands now, the U.S. society has made the most beautiful element between a woman and a man the most shameful. This is what we could consider the advesary at His best. To inhibit a man his sexual right is to ask him to submit to emasculation. Furthermore, a woman in submission, acceptance and joy to her greatest power on earth becomes literally the most beautiful woman you will ever see. So may i ask why the condemnation regarding procreation?
However, if it be pure love you seek, i wish you to consider the amount of single mothers in our nation without responsible men in their lives to help care for their child,
Why would polygamy be bad?
Originally posted by AshleyD
reply to post by enchantress62
Thanks for clarifying. I must say it is a pet peeve of mine when I see Christianity getting dragged through the mud and Christians criticized all over the board. When we defend ourselves or the faith, we are accused of being hypocrites (if we dare sink to a fraction of the level of our accuser), threatened (if we answer a question about our beliefs), delusional (if we talk about God), etc.
Then a Christian makes a thread and all we hear is, 'Live and let live!' 'Where's the love?' 'What's it to you?' To infinity.