It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jfj123
I've NEVER, not one time, EVER said there was coal at ground zero. It's an example that an underground fire, with the proper fuel, can burn almost indefinitely.
The WTC's were full of insulative materials that could have encased fires and created furnace like conditions.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
I've NEVER, not one time, EVER said there was coal at ground zero. It's an example that an underground fire, with the proper fuel, can burn almost indefinitely.
At least you admit there was no coal at ground zero, so the comparison with the coal fire does not apply.
The WTC's were full of insulative materials that could have encased fires and created furnace like conditions.
Originally posted by jfj123
Prove me wrong with evidence and not your opinion.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
Prove me wrong with evidence and not your opinion.
Right after you post evidence and not just an opinion.
Why do you keep asking for evidnece but can never post any when asked?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
Prove me wrong with evidence and not your opinion.
Right after you post evidence and not just an opinion.
Originally posted by _Del_
You're a riot.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by _Del_
You're a riot.
You just keep proving that you will do anything to keep from posting evidence when asked.
Everyone can see what type of person you are with the lies, misquotes, and refusing to post evidence when asked.
Originally posted by jfj123
Everyone has seen the diagrams he's posted which is evidence so once again, you're lying.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
Everyone has seen the diagrams he's posted which is evidence so once again, you're lying.
So why does he lie about me and not post evidence when i ask?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
Everyone has seen the diagrams he's posted which is evidence so once again, you're lying.
So why does he lie about me and not post evidence when i ask?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
What fuel? Certainly wasn't jet fuel since it burned off in the first few minutes, and office furniture fires do not get hot enough to melt steel.
Where is the draft coming from that kept the fire hot enough to keep metals and steel molten for 6 weeks?
Originally posted by _Del_
I think I offered conclusive evidence that you were demonstrably, horribly, stunningly wrong.
Originally posted by Pilgrum
What puzzles me is the insistence on a conspiracy associated with post-collapse fires. IE what purpose did they serve?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Pilgrum
What puzzles me is the insistence on a conspiracy associated with post-collapse fires. IE what purpose did they serve?
What conspiracy, since when is wanting to find the truth a conspiracy?
Lets look at some factors.
1. The fires in the towers were not hot enough to melt steel.
2. The fires in the towers were burning out before the collapse.
So what other heat source could have casued that much molten metal and steel to melt and stay molten ?
Originally posted by jfj123
We've already told you how it could have happened.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Lets look at some factors.
1. The fires in the towers were not hot enough to melt steel.
2. The fires in the towers were burning out before the collapse.
So what other heat source could have casued that much molten metal and steel to melt and stay molten ?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
We've already told you how it could have happened.
"HOW IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED" is not evidence of what happened is it?
Why are you guys having such a hard time understanding a simple request for evidence? NOT theories and opinions.
You guys ask me for evidence, now i am asking you for evidence. Is that really so hard to understand?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
We've already told you how it could have happened.
"HOW IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED" is not evidence of what happened is it?
Why are you guys having such a hard time understanding a simple request for evidence? NOT theories and opinions.
You guys ask me for evidence, now i am asking you for evidence. Is that really so hard to understand?
Originally posted by jfj123
OK show me evidence that my hypothesis is wrong. You won't be able to show any evidence either See how this works?