Originally posted by jfj123
And since you know me, you can make that assumption ?
Based on your statements here, and the evidence people have repeatedly tried to show you that you have simply dismissed out of hand, yes.
Absolutely.
But even a prosecutor cannot charge someone without solid evidence.
No, but he CAN investigate, and continue to do so, as long as resources allow.
They were designed to take an impact from a 727 not traveling at high speed.
No, 707.
WTC Design Parameters
What does the timing matter?
It matters immensely. Steel doesn't just soften and weaken instantly under the kind of heat generated by the fires. It would take longer, hence my
assertion that if it happened at the END of the day I could possibly consider it.
The WTC's were massive structures that didn't collapse instantly from the plane impact.
Not instantly, but certainly a lot faster than one should expect.
The number of individuals required to pull off a conspiracy of this magnitude is simply too great to keep quite and not make a single mistake
that would leave physical evidence.
Hello? Same people who pulled off the Gulf of Tonkin false-flag? Same people who to this day have kept the activities of Area 51 and half a dozen
other secret bases under wraps? Same people who have kept what they know about UFOs quiet for more than 60 years? Same people who pulled off the
Manhattan Project (much of which is still secret to this day)? It's very,
very easy for these people to keep secrets. They have a lot of
practice. How do mob bosses hold hundreds, sometimes thousands of people under their thumbs and not get caught? Stop thinking like a damn defense
lawyer and think like a
cop. Physical evidence exists, or did at one time. All they have to do to make it go away is dump it in the deep
ocean or bury it somewhere the public can't (or wouldn't want to) go, like Yucca Mountain. As for the people, motivations of money, blackmail,
threats against their families, etc. go a long way to keeping them quiet.
(edit) You know what, never mind. I'm done with you. You obviously get your jollies playing the harpy. According to your standards of proof no
criminal would
ever successfully be prosecuted. You don't want proof, you want angry truthers to attack you. You're just like a
Scientologist. People show you evidence again and again, more is available to find, and you keep coming back and either saying it's not evidence or
it's not proof. Let me tell you something: Only
one aspect of the official story needs to be proven false. Only one. That's all it takes
for a rational mind to question how much of the rest of the story is bull. But you're not rational. You're only here to annoy and harass. This is
a game to you. You keep saying you think there's more to the story, but you only say it to evade criticism. It's all garbage and I for one won't
put up with it anymore.
[edit on 3/17/2008 by The Nighthawk]
[edit on 3/17/2008 by The Nighthawk]
