It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I disagree that the current war has nothing to do with national security. Have they mismanaged the war, and acted with negligence? Sure.
However, Iraq is a central place in the middle-east. They may not have had WMD's, however Al Qaeda was known to be there, as they STILL ARE.
Hussein was a brutal dictator that killed thousands of people.
It is very easy to say we are not safer but you do not know what may have happened if Hussein aided terrorist groups with all his money
Originally posted by jfj123
What was the specific reason?
Also,
What are your sources and what did they say?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
What was the specific reason?
Also,
What are your sources and what did they say?
I do not remember the specific reason they just evoked the 1 law enforcement reason for not relasing information.
Tully Constructions company was the one company i e-mailed.
Originally posted by jfj123
You said that since you work in the government, you have good sources. Is Tully construction a government source you were referring to?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
You said that since you work in the government, you have good sources. Is Tully construction a government source you were referring to?
No, Tully Construction was just one of the large coontractors that i e-mailed.
Most of my sources are from professional and governemnt research sites and FOIA requests to government agencies.
Originally posted by jfj123
So to ask again,
What are your government sources and what did they say?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
So to ask again,
What are your government sources and what did they say?
Well i recieved the Flight 77 FDR data from the NTSB from a FOIA request.
I also have FOIA request into the following.
FBI
NIST
NSA
Here are a few unclassified government sites i use as research and found a lot mre evindece that questions the official story then supports it.
www.fbi.gov
www.ntsb.gov
www.faa.gov
www.defenselink.gov
www.trackingthethreat.com
www.ctstudies.com
Plus i work for the governmant and have access to some good sources.
Originally posted by jfj123
These are the same sources that you are claiming are part of the conspiracy and you also don't need to work for the government to have these sources as they are available to anyone.
This statement means that since you work for the government, you have access to sources that we don't.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
These are the same sources that you are claiming are part of the conspiracy and you also don't need to work for the government to have these sources as they are available to anyone.
This statement means that since you work for the government, you have access to sources that we don't.
What conspiracy? When did i say anything about a conspiracy?
But i also have access to classified sites.
Originally posted by jfj123
So then you believe the official story.
And what evidence have you found on those sites that is pertinent to this discussion?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
So then you believe the official story.
And what evidence have you found on those sites that is pertinent to this discussion?
No, i am looking for the truth, and so far there is more evindece that questions the official story then suports it.
Originally posted by jfj123
That means you believe the government is covering up the truth-Thus the conspiracy.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
That means you believe the government is covering up the truth-Thus the conspiracy.
When is looking for the truth a conspiracy?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
That means you believe the government is covering up the truth-Thus the conspiracy.
When is looking for the truth a conspiracy?
Originally posted by jfj123
You are saying you do not agree with the official story.
you are saying there is some sort of coverup. the coverup is the conspiracy.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
You are saying you do not agree with the official story.
Just becasue i do not believe the official story does not automatically mean i believe a conspiracy.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
You are saying you do not agree with the official story.
you are saying there is some sort of coverup. the coverup is the conspiracy.
Just becasue i do not believe the official story does not automatically mean i believe a conspiracy. In fact the official story is based on a conspiracy.
I never stated there was a coverup. Not releasing information does not mean a coverup.
[edit on 11-4-2008 by ULTIMA1]
Originally posted by jfj123
Yes it does.
If you don't believe the official story and that is what the government said happened, you are calling them liers.
Originally posted by jfj123
No, no..You said earlier that a lack of information (aka evidence) is a sign of guilt.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
Yes it does.
If you don't believe the official story and that is what the government said happened, you are calling them liers.
NO it does not.
In the criminal law, a conspiracy is an agreement between natural persons to break the law at some time in the future, and, in some cases, with at least one overt act in furtherance of that agreement.
Just becasue i do not believe the official story does not mean i believe in a conspiracy.