It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
Sort of like when you claimed the perdue video showed the plane breaking up at impact......
Becasue it does show the plane being shredded as soon as it hits the building.
[edit on 11-4-2008 by ULTIMA1]
Originally posted by jfj123
The video shows the plane beginning to shred but the video also shows the pieces causing structural damage.
Originally posted by Comsence2075
Ultima, I agree there are more questions than answers, absolutely. However, have you ever considered that a lot of information is being withheld for national security reasons?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Pilgrum
I'd like to thank all those who've presented pictures and data I hadn't seen before. It has been encouragement to look deeper into what's available and it all leads me further away from the 'macro' theories of conspiracy like faked plane crashes, planted parts, buildings destroyed via means other than plane crashes and fires.
But still no pictures and data to actually support the official stroy.
No photos of Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon.
No official reports that match the parts found to Flight 77.
There is more evidence that questions the official story then supports it.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
The video shows the plane beginning to shred but the video also shows the pieces causing structural damage.
But the plane is being shredded, in fact the wings barely make it into the building.
Most reports also state the buildings witstood the planes impacts.
[edit on 11-4-2008 by ULTIMA1]
Originally posted by jfj123
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Comsence2075
Ultima, I agree there are more questions than answers, absolutely. However, have you ever considered that a lot of information is being withheld for national security reasons?
What national security reasons?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
And once again, I'm forced to state that a lack of evidence is not evidence.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Comsence2075
Ultima, I agree there are more questions than answers, absolutely. However, have you ever considered that a lot of information is being withheld for national security reasons?
What national security reasons?
Originally posted by Comsence2075
What national security reasons? Um, it is the pentagon, there are many reasons why we would withhold some specific reasons for things.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Comsence2075
What national security reasons? Um, it is the pentagon, there are many reasons why we would withhold some specific reasons for things.
So its the Pentagon. Its also was a crime scene. Why are the refusing to release information even with a FOIA request? (that only has a few reasons why infomration can be witheld)
Originally posted by talisman
I totally disagree with the "NATIONAL SECURITY" excuse for lack of video detail at the Pentagon or a fuller explanation on other things.
The reason??
This Gov has lost the trust of the people by going into an illegal war that had nothing to do with the supposed man behind 9/11, with a lie of WMD.
How, can anyone trust the "NATIONAL SECURITY" excuse when in reality the current war would be in NO WAY IN THE INTERESTS OF NATIONAL SECURITY!?
They aren't acting in the interests of "NATIONAL SECURITY" with how they wage war, so there is no good reason to trust them at all.
[edit on 11-4-2008 by talisman]
Originally posted by jfj123
When you asked them, what did they tell you?
Originally posted by Comsence2075
They may not have had WMD's, however Al Qaeda was known to be there, as they STILL ARE. .
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
When you asked them, what did they tell you?
Well they came up with a excuse but it was very flimsy.
Plus i work for the governmant and have access to some good sources.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Comsence2075
They may not have had WMD's, however Al Qaeda was known to be there, as they STILL ARE. .
But they diod have WMDs they had used them. Plus we found evindece and were told by defectors that most of the WMDs were moved.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Comsence2075
They may not have had WMD's, however Al Qaeda was known to be there, as they STILL ARE. .
But they diod have WMDs they had used them. Plus we found evindece and were told by defectors that most of the WMDs were moved.
Originally posted by jfj123
What was the excuse?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
What was the excuse?
It was a law enforcement excuse,
but seeing that they the FBI only spent 5 days at the crime scene it does not seem like they need to hold basic infomration.
I have also e-mailed companies that were at ground zero. One company wrote back and stated thry could not answer my questions due to 9/11 lawsuits.