It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If there were planes that struck the towers, then those planes should have been identified.
How do you know that planes hit the towers if you do not know the identity of the planes?
How do you know that planes were involved if you can't identify them?
Originally posted by tezzajw
Originally posted by jfj123
You're just not getting this. I never said I could. Look back at my posts and carefully re-read them and you'll notice I've only claimed planes hit. That's it. Nothing more. Do you understand that??
So you can't positively identify the planes that you claim were involved.
How do you know that planes were involved if you can't identify them?
Originally posted by jawaadr12
ok so i see people posting saying that 9/11 was an inside job. i see people posting saying that the government had no involvement in 9/11. ok so let's assume that the government is squeaky clean and had NOTHING to do with 9/11. i know this is irrelevant to this topic but how can ANYONE agree with what the government is doing. they are committing atrocious inhumane crimes to innocent people, believe it or not. how can anyone support this kind of selfish, greedy behavior ?!?!?!?
Originally posted by biggie smalls
reply to post by jfj123
You're assuming too much.
I feel the same way. IF planes did hit the towers, what proof do we have they were Flight 11 and 175?
What IF it was a hologram? We don't know.
What IF multiple guided missiles hit the towers? (this is probably what happened at the pentagon but that's a whole different story)
Originally posted by jfj123
For what is it now...the 8th time??? I've never said I could identify the planes with 100 % certainty.
So are YOU saying planes did NOT hit the buildings? YES or NO? This is a really simple question.
Originally posted by tezzajw
Originally posted by jfj123
For what is it now...the 8th time??? I've never said I could identify the planes with 100 % certainty.
Why is that so?
Don't you think that any competent, thorough investigation would have identified the planes that were allegedly involved?
The fact that none of the investigations were able to positively identify the planes allegedly involved is evidence for a conspiracy to obfuscate the truth.
What evidence are you seeking that will convince you that a conspiracy took place?
You believe that two planes hit the towers, yet you are not positively able to identify them - don't you think that's strange?
So are YOU saying planes did NOT hit the buildings? YES or NO? This is a really simple question.
I find it highly suspect that there has not been a positive identification made for the planes that were alleged to have hit the towers.
I find it even more suspect that a passport can survive the fireball and a thousand foot fall through rubble, yet remain intact enough to read and be identified as one of the highjackers...
Originally posted by biggie smalls
reply to post by jfj123
IF a hologram was used, it would have been "above top secret" technology.
Here's a few threads mentioning the hologram technology. Remember the black budgeted government (CIA, NSA, etc) are years ahead of mainstream military and civilian technology.
I'm not suggesting that holograms were used on the WTC. I'm saying we just can't prove it without verifiable evidence.
Originally posted by jfj123
Please show me the report that says this.
Originally posted by jfj123
My evidence is as follows:
Hundreds of photos
Videos
Eyewitness accounts
wreckage
physical damage on the buildings
plane fuel
etc..
Originally posted by jfj123
You're just not getting this. I never said I could.
Originally posted by tezzajw
Originally posted by jfj123
For what is it now...the 8th time??? I've never said I could identify the planes with 100 % certainty.
Why is that so?
Don't you think that any competent, thorough investigation would have identified the planes that were allegedly involved?
The fact that none of the investigations were able to positively identify the planes allegedly involved is evidence for a conspiracy to obfuscate the truth.
What evidence are you seeking that will convince you that a conspiracy took place? You believe that two planes hit the towers, yet you are not positively able to identify them - don't you think that's strange?
So are YOU saying planes did NOT hit the buildings? YES or NO? This is a really simple question.
I don't know what allegedly hit the towers, or if they were even hit by anything.
I find it highly suspect that there has not been a positive identification made for the planes that were alleged to have hit the towers.
I find it even more suspect that a passport can survive the fireball and a thousand foot fall through rubble, yet remain intact enough to read and be identified as one of the highjackers...
Originally posted by tezzajw
Originally posted by jfj123
For what is it now...the 8th time??? I've never said I could identify the planes with 100 % certainty.
Why is that so?
Don't you think that any competent, thorough investigation would have identified the planes that were allegedly involved?
The fact that none of the investigations were able to positively identify the planes allegedly involved is evidence for a conspiracy to obfuscate the truth.
What evidence are you seeking that will convince you that a conspiracy took place? You believe that two planes hit the towers, yet you are not positively able to identify them - don't you think that's strange?
So are YOU saying planes did NOT hit the buildings? YES or NO? This is a really simple question.
I don't know what allegedly hit the towers, or if they were even hit by anything.
I find it highly suspect that there has not been a positive identification made for the planes that were alleged to have hit the towers.
I find it even more suspect that a passport can survive the fireball and a thousand foot fall through rubble, yet remain intact enough to read and be identified as one of the highjackers...