It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by plasmacutter
Ok so what you are saying is that for the simple reason that the planes hit the towers and because they (planes) started the fires
then the plane have to be directly resposable for the colapses??
Originally posted by space cadet
and after reading it I only gained even more proof that the towers collapsed due to the impact and following fires from jet fuel.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Funny how people just believe that because planes hit the towers that they casued it to collapse without even looking at any facts or doing any research.
Originally posted by Disclosed
by doing research, they will find the truth...
...as proven by the NIST, FEMA and 911 commission reports.
Originally posted by hmmmbeer
a) The Pentagon - the damage to it was in line with a cruise missle hit or similar; no wings, engines, tail section etc were found and no damage that would have been caused by these
... I have no idea what really happened to FLight 77 - it certainly did not hit the pentagon...
93 was shot down.
Originally posted by bovarcher
5. Explain where the 'cruise missile' was launched from, by whom, under whose orders, what was its flight trajectory and what was its serial number - please
Originally posted by plasmacutter
U do realize that a flame has to be maintaind at atleast 2800 F to keep stell molte right??
U do realize that once the flame reaches 2600_2750 depending on its carbon content it will solidfie ?? and turn what ever color the corrasponding temp is right ??
And U do realize that if just one or 2 beams became glow red and lost 50% of there strength there is 40 others to take the stress load off the weak beams ? and 120 outer beams to also help??
U do understand that right?
Originally posted by plasmacutter
Because if u did i realy think u would answer ur own questi, im not saying the fire didnt get hot enough to create some stresses ,
but it clearly wasnt hot enough to bring any beam that day to a molten state ,and keep it molten after it fell 1000 feet and cooling all the way down.
This wasnt sheet metal this was high grade structural steel rated to withstand a temp of 2000 F for 2 hours without fire pfoofing
Originally posted by plasmacutter
And rember they where progresive buildings they got lighter as they went up,
So to be fair the steel around where the both planes hit was in the 3 to 4 inch range the 6 inch was way way down at the basement thats where the heavy heavy stuff was
Id suggest to all watch the( makeing of the twin towers an american icon)
It is just so friggin amazing the amount of concrete steel rebar sheet rock data wire paint that was in the building
Hell each floor was an acre(40,000 square feet) try to keep that heated and cooled and then do it 109 more times.
Originally posted by plasmacutter
U do realize thermal images from above where taken and the hottest temp was said to be 1750 F well below 2800 F.
and yes im aware of objects creating black smoke ,
But the fact remains a non conrolled cant maintain a continuious heat to keep a 2800 F temp. no fuel can create 2800 F in open air eviroment,
and lead in its molten state is not red ,it would start to turn to vapor .
Originally posted by plasmacutter
www.investigate911.com...
do U agree this is still molten and if so
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
Well to start, we don't know that the steel got red hot AFTER the building collapsed. It may have been red hot before and then been buried after the collapse.
There are no reports of the fires getting hot enough to cause the steel to get red hot.
I do research and post facts and evidence, if they go against the officail story thats not conspiracy.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
How many airplane (of a compariable type to the 747) collisions with a building in mid-air have you had to deal with in your time as a whatever?
Well for one the planes that were supposed to have the towers were 767s not 747s. You should at least be able to get the planes right.
Second there was a b-25 that hit the Empire state building.
Third, i have shown several times steel buildings that had longer lasting fires and MORE STRUCTURAL DAMAGE then the towers and did not collapse.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
reply to post by ULTIMA1
LoL!!!!!
Yes try to completely bypass the fact that the Empire State Building is of a vastly different design than the Twin Towers with that.
LoL!!!!!!
Nice try.
But not nice enough.