It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by West Coast
How about, "Common knowledge."
Do you honestly think all this does not have a profound impact on the people, and environment?
Originally posted by Witness2008
What do you mean "who knows"? the video explains it.
Originally posted by chinawhite
Originally posted by West Coast
No, that is the World bank discovering a error and correcting it...
Actually the World Bank study was based on 11 Chinese provinces and wasn't in depth mainly focusing on poverty reduction rates which happened to correlate with PPP figures.
And its the world banks study which is just one opinion. The IMF and CIA give two other figures
IMF - 11,606,336
CIA - 7,043,000
Downward revisions for PPP-based GDP of two of the world's fastest-growing economies, China and India, are mainly responsible for the overall reduction of global growth estimates (see Chart 2). For 2007, China's share of global output is now estimated at 10.9 percent (down from 15.8 percent)
But who is right and who is wrong?. Who knows
And people predict that the US will hit a recession as well.
Also, they claimed that Chinas economy would reach only 8% last year and then it reached 11.7% during the 06-07 financial year
Simple Maths.
5.33 Trill * 1.12
12 Trill * 1.03
15 years the Chinese economy will be 26.04 Trillion
15 years the American economy will be 18.15 Trillion
It'll be about 11 years or 12 years before the American economy is surpassed by the Chinese one if we use a figure of 10%
Originally posted by chinawhite
None of which backs up your argument that "Much of China already is, an ecological wasteland. "
Originally posted by West Coast
Feel free to explain how you think the "previous" methods had chinas GDP PPP figures "right."
The CIA figure doesn't surprise me
Assessments Were Gloomy
In fact, the agency's public assessments of the Soviet economy since 1980 have been uniformly gloomy, and its forecasts of political and social fallout from those economic problems appear to have been largely on the mark.
Yet outside experts have persisted in the criticism, in part because they believe that the C.I.A.'s underlying estimates of the size of the economy have been far too rosy, even if the agency's forecasts have been correct.
Regardless, the revised estimates do paint a poorer china then previously thought..
Just as well as people who predict the US wont hit a "full blown recession."
Again, that depends on which figures you base that info off of. The IMF's, the world banks, or the CIA's?
Errr. From what numbers are you basing those figures off of?
Originally posted by West Coast
I have stated the facts, you have chosen to ignore them.
Water pollution on a grand scale, plant and animal life going extinct, MASSIVE chronic health problems to the public,
Originally posted by Witness2008
What was said in the video was indeed what happened. I leave you some more information on the matter.
You said that China even growing at 12% would not surpass the US by 2030 and the maths clearly showing that to be improbable
Originally posted by West Coast
I hope that settles that "spoof."
Originally posted by Witness2008
Why did not the military attempt to detain them instead of shooting.
And why if a shot young girl attempts to get up why was she shot again?
Originally posted by chinawhite
Everyone makes mistakes. Not really a big deal
Originally posted by Witness2008
So with your reasoning it is better to kill a person than to let them leave.
Originally posted by sy.gunson
China White has not seen the video, because if he had he would know about the Tibetan who sought refuge with the party of mountaineers.
He does not know about the treaty between Tibet- Great Britain and China in 1918 describing in detail the boundary between China and Tibet giving recognition to Tibet as a sovereign country.
He does not know that the Dalai Lama was born after the Qing (Manchu dynasty ) ended and therefore was not chosen by China's Qing Emperor.
He did not know about findings of fact by the International Committee of Jurists about Tibetan
He did not know about the history of Qing invasions of Tibet nor that in 1911 when Sun Yat Sen declared Tibet part of China that in fact a Qing/ Manchu army was defeated in Tibet and driven out.
has more than once admitted to not knowing the facts himself.
Originally posted by West Coast
I do worry about Chinas ecology, as it affects every one living on this entire planet.
I think Humanity would have a great future if we all worked