It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by billybob
reply to post by Boone 870
not true. popular mechanics is making claims that the information they provide is evidence that the conspiracy theories are wrong.
and then they provide non-evidence disguised as authoritarian evidence. that is deception. 'lying'.
the CIA and chertoff moved into popular mechanics offices, and fired a bunch of people, and THEN they did the hit piece on conspiracy theory.
their 'science' is not science and disproves nothing. it is mere spin. even the NIST report falls far short of any PERTINENT scientific evaluation, and has zero repeatability, making it NOT SCIENCE.
who doesn't 'get' that the chertoffs are from the same bloodline as the original YELLOW JOURNALIST, william randolph hearst? one of them is at popular mechanics, and the other, the head of homeland security.
hello!? is this thing on???
the ties that bind
I used this same article way back to debunk the best debunker's who were holding steadfast to "Popular Mechanics" scam. Naturally I was blown off as the tin foil hat set- then- of course now the great debunker's have mysteriously disappeared because there is no longer a credible source to back up their ridiculous scientific "answers". The entire Chertoff debacle destroyed all official credibility and the fact that he did occupy space in the building- shortly afterwards there was a mass of firings at the magazine- was not a coincidence!
Originally posted by kelbtalfenek
I still say that logically-following a trail of evidence that is made available to us, the public, there isn't any actual evidence of a conspiracy.
And I believe that there are loads of evidence that were destroyed.
I can infer that there might have been a conspiracy but I can't provide evidence-real concrete evidence to prove that my inference is the correct conclusion.
Originally posted by Griff
reply to post by BlueRaja
But, I agree that no evidence does not neccessarily mean evidence but when they knowingly are throwing away evidence, it sure doesn't look good for them.