Bush: I want the romance of war , page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 16 times


reply posted on 16-3-2008 @ 02:44 AM by Amaterasu
reply to post by CreeWolf



Cree, wow. I don't think you see how unimportant this is. Dem or Rep, they are all corporately driven. And we can argue all night about who is most morally reprehensible, but in the end, the bankers who own the corporations who profit most, are the ones calling the shots.

And so, though I am sorry to be so blunt, I also respectfully must make this point.


reply posted on 16-3-2008 @ 03:05 AM by CreeWolf
reply to post by Amaterasu



I understand your point very well, but I was trying to stay on topic. I know how biased the media is; I know that things are screwed up when your average American can't run for President realistically any more unless they have millions of millions of dollars; I understand these jackasses are running our country into the ground; I understand the "good-ole-boy/in the pocket of lobbyists-mentality" of Washington. The point I have is that Bush is closer to a patriot than Bill Clinton ever could have been. People seem to have forgotten or don't seem to even know how crappy Clinton treated our military. At least Bush tries to support the troops. Clinton would just assume had spit on them.

MrsEsterhouse said
This President is trying to make war appealing to all the video game generation for recruitment purposes.

My response is "so what!?" Is it a sin to try to recruit our strongest and abled-bodied into our military? Perhaps it would be better to draft them in the future? My son wants to enlist out of high school and I support that (I'll probably try to discourage him if another Clinton is elected though). No matter how much others would have you believe otherwise, having a strong voluntary service military is a GOOD THING! Generally, they form more cohesive units and comradery, perform better, and are less likely to compromise each other or their service to their country. Many people still feel that way although you don't see much of that in this forum ((PS--I am NOT knocking ATS for that because I love this forum!))


George H. W. Bush's ride in WW2......

Where was Clinton?


[edit on 16-3-2008 by CreeWolf]

[edit on 16-3-2008 by CreeWolf]

[edit on 16-3-2008 by CreeWolf]

[edit on 16-3-2008 by CreeWolf]


reply posted on 16-3-2008 @ 03:43 AM by CreeWolf
reply to post by Lucid Lunacy



No, but nice slant. I'm implying that the stupid thing Clinton DID was sending our military to bomb civilians (and into harm's way) in Serbia to distract attention from the cigar play (tell me, why did we go into the Balkans?). The stupid thing Bush SAID is the whole subject line of the OP. Its pretty common knowledge that the Bush's (especially W.) aren't the most eloquent of speakers.

Edit: Sending our nation to war on false pretenses is another thread entirely. When it all comes out, you'll probably learn that what Clinton did to get us to the Balkans was more absurd than what Bush(s) did to get us to the Middle East. We've got more business there than we had in the Balkans. In case you haven't heard, there are some Muslims who don't like us and want to kill all infidels

[edit on 16-3-2008 by CreeWolf]


reply posted on 16-3-2008 @ 06:48 AM by StellarX
Originally posted by Attari
When outcome of democracy is people like Bush, we suspect democracy!


But since Bush was not elected ( and less than 1/4 of eligible Americans supposedly voted for him before he was handed the post by a unelected body of old timers his dad helped out) maybe we do not have to condemn either Americans or democracy to hell?

Without his family and weath, Bush would have difficulty getting an ordinary job in the real world in my opinion. What an advertisement for Western culture he is....


Without his family and wealth he would have been a different person and it's entirely futile to speculate about who or what he might have been. Even WITH all that wealth and connections he could have been a very different person as wealth and power does not have to breed such contempt for humanity in general.

Bush's level of stupidity is very serious.


So stupid in fact that he become the president of the United States of America. Maybe we should all aspire to that type of stupidity then? What we should stop doing is calling these people stupid for doing things we BELIEVE to be stupid somehow missing out on the fact that they are ripping us off better than any group before them. If you want to call such brutal effectiveness 'stupid' that's your choice but it hasn't and probably wont stop them from taking what ever you have left.

Hopefully he leaves the office before he take any stupid action against Iran.


As if he really makes that kind of decisions. You don't have to be either stupid or really intelligent to serve as a puppet and know your place in the grand scheme of things.

Stellar


reply posted on 16-3-2008 @ 07:16 AM by Apolon
reply to post by GradyPhilpott



I even saw him being rescued on film and was with smile on his face rather relaxed considering he was through trauma of shooting and loosing a friend.
All that and more is so strange and so well documented that it stinks on miles away.
Everything can be organized and staged just like bush Jr. pilot "carrier" and all past information that could and would compromised them.
His granddad was a Nazi and was supplying Nazi Germany war machine with almost 40% of heavy metal for guns and aeroplane industry to prolong the war.
Do you think that thing was not orchestrated by his men and so carefully recorded for us to support their patriotic and noble side?
Every shred of evidence can be staged and written down the way they want.
So sad People fall for patriotic BS so easy and forget who whole bush family is and what they represent and for what.
Your Granddads and Fathers have died in a WWII, from German guns, U boats and all weapons suppled and built by your metal supplied PERSONALLY by bush and Rockefeller's and few others who made trillions of $.
Hope they all die from a horrific, painful and long disease.

[edit on 16-3-2008 by Apolon]


reply posted on 16-3-2008 @ 12:35 PM by Amaterasu
Originally posted by CreeWolf
reply to
post by Amaterasu



I understand your point very well, but I was trying to stay on topic. I know how biased the media is; I know that things are screwed up when your average American can't run for President realistically any more unless they have millions of millions of dollars; I understand these jackasses are running our country into the ground; I understand the "good-ole-boy/in the pocket of lobbyists-mentality" of Washington. The point I have is that Bush is closer to a patriot than Bill Clinton ever could have been. People seem to have forgotten or don't seem to even know how crappy Clinton treated our military. At least Bush tries to support the troops. Clinton would just assume had spit on them.


Well, frankly, based on all the actions of the past number of administrations, none are patriotic. I find the idea that one scumbag being more "patriotic" than another scumbag almost humorous - if it wasn't so wretchedly disheartening.

Bush HAS to "support our troops" lest he have no cannon fodder. And his "support" comes in romanticizing war, being complicit in attacking us, throwing our troops into the flames to protect oil investments and create corporate contracts, lying about why we had to go to war in the first place.

I respectfully disagree with giving him any "patriotic" status. As for Bill, I wouldn't call him a patriot any more than Bush.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Failed US Foreign Policy? Is Ron Paul the Answer? History Says NO!
  Posted 19 days ago with 26 member flags
How gullible do you have to be to think Iran is a threat?
  Posted 19 days ago with 26 member flags
You heard of SOPA and PIPA.Now ACTA! Must read.
  Posted 18 days ago with 25 member flags
On why America is in denial and Ron Paul will not be elected
  Posted 16 days ago with 21 member flags
Study says racists and conservatives are dumb
  Posted 6 days ago with 16 member flags
Is ‘anti-Canadianism’ the new ‘anti-Americanism?’
  Posted 15 days ago with 8 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Santorum wants more fracking!!!
  US Political Madness, Posted 13 hours ago, 53 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 9 hours ago, 52 replies