Bush: I want the romance of war , page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 16 times
Topic started on 15-3-2008 @ 04:24 AM by Attari

Bush: I want the romance of war


www.presstv.ir
The US president claims he would join the troops in Afghanistan if he were younger, saying he is 'envious' of those in the front lines.

"I must say, I'm a little envious. If I were slightly younger and not employed here, I think it would be a fantastic experience to be on the front lines of helping this young democracy succeed," said President George W. Bush in a Thursday video conference.
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 15-3-2008 @ 05:31 AM by PuRe EnErGy
Originally posted by BRITWARRIOR
Originally posted by PuRe EnErGy


In my opinion there are far more intelligent things to do than kill and be killed.

[edit on 3/15/2008 by PuRe EnErGy]




so true!!

but sometimes you have no choice but to retaliat to secure peace and for a safer world, while bush may have/was 100% wrong about iraq, afghaistan as i said before is the 100% the right thing to do, and a war that needs to be won, iraq & afghanistan imo are completly diffrent matters,


those are circular arguments to me.... war is no solution and those who think it is simply do not understand the experience here (on earth)... people go too far with their ideas and culture; the society they hold so dear, we are all born as children; we as children only learn what adult-hood is from other children who imagine they are adults, we call them parents and for anyone who has some they should know they are definitely not 'adult' and in most cases are more childish than we assume we are.

[edit on 3/15/2008 by PuRe EnErGy]


To RETALIATE to SECURE ........ = PEACE???

The words Retaliate and Secure(in this context) is not peace and have nothing to do with it..

ALTHOUGH...

**IF** as we have perverted the word secure in the context of military missions... to "secure, the area" usually meaning securing it for a certain idea/opinion/side.... killing people..
than we can safely assume what PEACE means in the Bush context is only total annihilation of whatever opposes his ideas/opinions/side.. being unfortunately the American people who are following his WORDS and not his MEANING.

[edit on 3/15/2008 by PuRe EnErGy]


reply posted on 15-3-2008 @ 05:43 AM by BRITWARRIOR
reply to post by PuRe EnErGy


i kinda get you,

but heres a question for you

wot do you do if your being attacked? sit there? or act?

so untill theres people like this about how can you live in a peacefull world? buy ignoring it?


reply posted on 15-3-2008 @ 05:54 AM by PuRe EnErGy
Originally posted by BRITWARRIOR
reply to post by PuRe EnErGy


i kinda get you,

but heres a question for you

wot do you do if your being attacked? sit there? or act?

so untill theres people like this about how can you live in a peacefull world? buy ignoring it?


a little paranoid are we? ... whose attacking me?
it is a constant happening? was I struck once? .. you are being vague to make a vague point, either way it is a hypothetical situation.. so should I perhaps install some hypothetical controls to monitor the hypothetical outcomes? and get so caught up in a hypothetical world I completely leave and ruin this one?

No one likes to be hit... much less intimidated, threatened or terrorized, but you do not fight fire with fire or water with water...
There is really no reason that YOU or I should have at all about this affair because we were simply born into a system that was setup centuries ago by families who passed their wealth and knowledge down, this is not conspiracy it is just intelligence anyone with a brain would do this.... the unfortunate thing is, is when they got the brilliant idea that to keep more of the money for themselves they should intermarry ..

we're just a story some hypothetical people will read and we will be the hypothetical people they read about.

[edit on 3/15/2008 by PuRe EnErGy]


reply posted on 15-3-2008 @ 06:01 AM by dgtempe
reply to post by BRITWARRIOR
ACT. Get that gang out of the White House ASAP.
If more people had seen the real truth of the "attack" they would have been out on their cans by now.
That's why God invented straight jackets.



reply posted on 15-3-2008 @ 06:05 AM by BRITWARRIOR
Originally posted by PuRe EnErGy
Originally posted by BRITWARRIOR
reply to post by PuRe EnErGy


i kinda get you,

but heres a question for you

wot do you do if your being attacked? sit there? or act?

so untill theres people like this about how can you live in a peacefull world? buy ignoring it?


a little paranoid are we? ... whose attacking me?
it is a constant happening? was I struck once? .. you are being vague to make a vague point, either way it is a hypothetical situation.. so should I perhaps install some hypothetical controls to monitor the hypothetical outcomes? and get so caught up in a hypothetical world I completely leave and ruin this one?





[edit on 3/15/2008 by PuRe EnErGy]


lol

no im not paraniod im asking you wot you would do if you was attacked or your country was and you was incharge! all your implying is nothing at the minite!!!, because your saying war is no solution in a previous post, and it clearly is if its the only thing you can do should you be attacked? its the last option but the only in some case's i.e sit there and let extreamists plan attacks on your country because of your culture?

[edit on 15-3-2008 by BRITWARRIOR]


reply posted on 15-3-2008 @ 06:10 AM by dgtempe
reply to post by Lucid Lunacy

Lucid,

I like you! You have a good mind inside that head of yours which has much knowledge among all the grey matter. I enjoy your posts very much, btw.

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Failed US Foreign Policy? Is Ron Paul the Answer? History Says NO!
  Posted 19 days ago with 26 member flags
How gullible do you have to be to think Iran is a threat?
  Posted 19 days ago with 26 member flags
You heard of SOPA and PIPA.Now ACTA! Must read.
  Posted 18 days ago with 25 member flags
On why America is in denial and Ron Paul will not be elected
  Posted 16 days ago with 21 member flags
Study says racists and conservatives are dumb
  Posted 6 days ago with 16 member flags
Is ‘anti-Canadianism’ the new ‘anti-Americanism?’
  Posted 15 days ago with 8 member flags