reply to post by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
Ok. Seeing as to how I didn't give you a fair shake much less explain my laughter at what I see to be your presumption
(and impressive in a sad
way ego)I will offer you an indepth analysis into what I read from your post.
Perhaps I missintepreted you, but I think that highly unlikely given past encounters with you.
Whereas I am ammicable to your analysis, I also must say that to me no one is different to anyone. All I see are similarities. Everyone is similar to
everyone else.
In this I see that from square one completely miss the point of my post.
Which I will explain now.
I was not commenting on how everyone is different.
I was commenting that everyone is different things to different people.
Usually quite contridictory to each person.
Real life case in point. A particularly annoying member
(to me) that was recently banned.
I found her to be largely a childish banshee.
Others saw other things in her that leave me scratching my head and wondering what they were on.
I don't pretend that I am right.
Perhaps I missed something but she was undeniably different things to different people.
All I see are similarities. Everyone is similar to everyone else.
If you seek to over simplify yes. I can see where you would come to that point.
But that again is not what I was talking about.
I was talking about the impressions others have of us and how they are almost inevitably different and unspokenly about how you can't be all good
things to everyone.
Everyone's perception is different, some are simular yes, but still different even if its a simple matter of how they came to that perception.
My brain is evolving to a place where I can seriously no longer see differences, even if I attempt to force myself to that point.
In this sentence I see pure ego and calling your failure perfection.
In this sentence you claim to have advanced, even when you seem to have completely missed the point of my post and twisted it into something else that
I can only guess at.
For example: "Everyone is a DIFFERENT something to everyone." Would mean that we are all the same if this is true for everyone. Conclusion, we're
all the same, and moreon:
"Everyone is a SAME something to everyone." Would also mean that we are all similar. And after combining the top two together I'd equate that
Everyone is the SAME everything to everyone, even if that same everything is what you may call or perceive as DIFFERENT.
Huh??????
I can see how you came up with this. In a weird sort of mindframe that largely has no bearing with reality.
Or maybe your just guilty of oversimplification which is my theory.
Saying everyone is different does
NOT equal saying everyone is the same. Sure it uses the same word. But the spirit of the word is something
vastly different.
A great many things are "different".
Can someone be fat and anorexic at the same time?
Soaking wet and bone dry at the same time?
Can something be safe to eat yet deadly at the same time?
Kind of like that.
Needless to say I find what you wrote to be little more than twisted logic.
What is different to me will not be different to you and etc and so forth.
Thusly NOT the same.
Can you grasp what I am saying here?
I did give you a star. Good insight.
Thank you. I have been accused of having good insight before.
Most the time I think I am just a loud mouth over analysing baffoon.
Honestly.
In conclusion:
I dislike you. I make no bones about it.
I have seen you make such egocentric statements
(multiple times) as:
"You think that is why your doing something. But your wrong."
There is an implied superiority there with very little in the way of proof of that superiority that sets my teeth on edge.
As well as quasi-claims of psychic ability or something as if based off of one statement you know someones motivations.
And that is not withstanding the times I have seen you wantonly misintepret every statement that you did not like.
Twisting statements of one kind into its opposite.
Usually semanticly and ignore the spirit in which those words are meant as if doing such is a sign of great intellect.
Which I find to be the exact opposite of intellect.
Or my particular favorite "You think your right but your wrong." with the implied "And I'm right." with no evidence to support your claim other
than the semantic twisting I mentioned above.
Take it as you will. Perhaps you will take this as the constructive criticism is was meant to be and learn something. Though I rather doubt it.
My guess is your reply if any will be yet another twisting of my meaning into a parody so that you can keep your superior view of yourself
(unwarrented).
But I have been wrong before and people have shocked me before.
*shrugs*
[edit on 18-3-2008 by WraothAscendant]