It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


'Pre-Inca' temple found in Peru

page: 1

log in


posted on Mar, 14 2008 @ 02:46 AM

Archaeologists in Peru have discovered ancient temple ruins that could predate the Inca empire.

The temple on the periphery of the Sacsayhuaman fortress includes 11 rooms thought to have held mummies and idols.

Full Story Here BBC News


posted on Mar, 14 2008 @ 01:52 PM
Cool. According to the article it's not positive yet whether or not it actually predates the Incas, but it seems likely. Even appears to be transitory, so some gaps are starting to be filled.

posted on Mar, 29 2008 @ 01:26 AM
reply to post by RuneSpider

This is in no way surprising. The Inca, like the Aztecs in mesoamerica, were late comers to the game in the Andes. In fact by 3000 BC, there were man-made mounds being built at Aspero and Caral.

Without getting into details basically it went from empire in anarchy (politically speaking not the whole mad max thing for the next few thousand years)

Next came the Moche, who had many public works and unified a large portion of the Andes (AD 100-700)

I'm sure everyone on here is familiar with the Nazca, they came next, and they had a thing for lines in the desert

(If you haven't looked into the Nazca lines, I suggest it, very interesting)

Then came the Wari, then Chimu.

In fact the Inka didn't even appear, at least as a dominant force until AD 1476, and only lasted until 1534. They existed as a tribe long before, but were just another small tribe. It was not until AD 1476 that they began carving out their great empire, and making their large public works (Their road system was absolutely intense)

Anyways, yeah, Inkas, at least as temple builders across the Andes, came thousands of years after their predecessors had done the same.

new topics

log in