Obama's Pastor Blames America for 9-11, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times


reply posted on 14-3-2008 @ 04:22 PM by Seeker Mom

The double standard with "PC" has driven this blatant problem to the back pages for too long. Lets be truthful, had this been a white church and Obama was white, he would never have even gotten this far.
reply to
post by jbondo



I couldn't agree more. Also, if this had been Hillary's pastor and you replaced the words 'rich white people' with 'poor black people' she would be under such fire that she would be forced to drop out of the race immediately. Yet Obama may waltz through this scandal unscathed?

If Hillary's campaign doesn't use this information against Obama now, you can bet your last dollar that the Republicans will have a field day with this during the general election. Right-wing radio is already frothing at the mouth over it.

Do people in the US really want a president they can't criticize without being called a racist? Do we want a president who has long-standing ties with someone who actually is on record blaming white Americans for 9-11, but who isn't suggesting a conspiracy or cover-up from the government? These things should be taken into consideration before Obama represents the Democratic party as its nominee, in my humble opinion.


reply posted on 14-3-2008 @ 04:44 PM by Stormdancer777
reply to post by Lucid Lunacy





Does anyone else have any things to share that further elucidates the connection between this pastor and Obama? And how much influence this pastor may be having on Obama.


I have plenty, these are things I knew about for a long time, even though this pastor has retired, he is now Obama spiritual campagin advisor.

Obama was a member for twenty years, this is not the only hate filled speach by Wright, Obama must think people are stupid.



reply posted on 14-3-2008 @ 05:25 PM by whoreallyknows
Obama has already spoken against the pastor calling his remaks "inflammatory" among other things. He wrote a long response for the huffington post

The Huffington Post




The pastor of my church, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, who recently preached his last sermon and is in the process of retiring, has touched off a firestorm over the last few days. He's drawn attention as the result of some inflammatory and appalling remarks he made about our country, our politics, and my political opponents.

Let me say at the outset that I vehemently disagree and strongly condemn the statements that have been the subject of this controversy. I categorically denounce any statement that disparages our great country or serves to divide us from our allies. I also believe that words that degrade individuals have no place in our public dialogue, whether it's on the campaign stump or in the pulpit. In sum, I reject outright the statements by Rev. Wright that are at issue.









Obama speaks out against pastor


edit for spelling


[edit on 14-3-2008 by whoreallyknows]


reply posted on 14-3-2008 @ 05:47 PM by whoreallyknows
reply to post by xmotex



I have to give Obama credit, he's calling the comments what they are "appalling", and not trying to sugar coat them or wiggle words or say they are out of context...like many other politicians do.



[edit on 14-3-2008 by whoreallyknows]


reply posted on 14-3-2008 @ 06:03 PM by FlyersFan
Originally posted by Raist
I really do not care what his pastor thinks or says it does not mean that Obama is right there in the same belief.


Sure it does.

Obama picked Wright to baptise his kids.

Obama picked Wright to perform his marriage.

Obama picked Wrights church to contribute money to.

Obama picked Wrights church to attend for 20 years - and to sit and listen to Wright over and over and over.

Obama picked Wrights sermons to use as a title to his book "audacity of hope" - the title is a direct quote from WRight.

OF COURSE Obama has the same beliefs. If he didn't, he wouldn't have done all those things. If he disagreed with Wright he would have walked out the door and never looked back instead of spending all those years with the guy .. and even quoting him for the title of his book.

Obama claiming to not be in step with this guy is pathetic.
He truly IS in step with him.
AND YES, it's just as relevant as David Duke being in step with the Klan.

Originally posted by Alxandro
how does Obama expect to unite the country if he doesn't denounce this preacher of hate?


He can't. And all Obama's rhetoric about 'unity' is a bunch of bunk.
OBVIOUSLY. Obama is just as racist as WRight - otherwise he would have left that church decades ago .. throwing up as he left.

The fact that Obama sits in that church and gives money to it .. and doesn't get sick from the hate and error spewed from the pulpit ... that speaks volumes about his so called 'unity' for America.



[edit on 3/14/2008 by FlyersFan]


reply posted on 14-3-2008 @ 06:09 PM by xmotex
reply to post by mule skinner





Err, he's been pretty brutally critical of the US government, but I haven't seen any quotes that would qualify as "racist".

Saying that rich white people mostly run the US isn't racist, it's simply a fact.


reply posted on 14-3-2008 @ 07:05 PM by FlyersFan
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
Quite a stretch IMHO.


Not at all.

If he didn't have the same beliefs he would have walked out. He wouldn't have wasted 20 years, and all that time and money, at a place if he didn't agree. He wouldn't have been able to stomach the rhetoric if he didn't agree.

Example - Would YOU have been able to sit in a pew for 2 hours every sunday for 20 years, (and give money to the place), and listen to a bunch of neo-nazi crap? No. It would have made you sick to your stomach and you wouldn't have been able to take it. You would have left. Only someone who agreed with it could have handled it. Obviously Obama agreed.

And I don't for a minute buy that Obama was 'unaware' of these speeches. Not for a minute. They were available on DVD and the place advertised them. The people there were in the pews jumping up and down in full agreement with the rhetoric so it wasn't being spewed 'quietly'. It was well known.

As far as the Catholic pedophile comment. .... Big difference.

Catholics were UNAWARE that there were some priests involved. When they found out that some were, they usually weren't their own priests. In the cases where it was their own priests, they only found out AFTER the priests had been terminated from that parish.

In response - Catholics stopped giving money to the Bishops money drives and they formed their own watch groups. 'For the sake of God's Children' is in direct response to the pedophilia scandal.

Catholics didn't know that the pedophilia was happening and by the time they found out something had happened, the priests were gone and the only way to respond was to withhold $$$. No lay Catholic was in agreement with the pedophilia and in fact they banded together in response to it.

The direct opposite is true of the parishoners in Obama's church. They are fully aware of WRight and his rhetoric .. and they jump up and down in agreement in the pews when he starts spewing.


reply posted on 14-3-2008 @ 07:09 PM by Areal51
reply to post by TheAgentNineteen



I just watched this video and I didn't hear anything wrong. What exactly did this preacher say that was so offensive?

What I heard was the contrast of two metaphors, basically those who are White and privileged against those who are Black and not privileged? Sure he used Obama's name and Hillary's name but their names were only being used in the context of metaphors in order to convey meaning and message. He referred more to the persona of each person rather than making reference to the actual persons. And it was not designed to create division but rather to illustrate the factors that conspire to limit a privileged or underprivileged person's view of what is going on around them. Factors which serve to divide one group of people against another group.

He made the comment that Hillary has never been told that she wasn't White enough. That's a reference to derogatory remarks that Black people who do well for themselves have sometimes had to face. Perhaps some have heard the phrase "Uncle Tom". That's where the reference comes from, and this type of mentality is causes great division and hatred between Black people. This is an illustration of how privilege and wealth can blind folks of one race and pit them against themselves.

Other illustrations provided in the preacher's sermon serve to illustrate other types of divisions and perceptions that are responsible for them.

The preacher begins by asking a series of questions about "Who cares?" The video clip then ends when the preacher says that he is glad there is a God who has taught him how not to give into hatred and instead to give into love. This is what one would expect in a Christian church.

I'm mystified as to what wrong has been said in this video. In my view, nothing wrong was said.


reply posted on 14-3-2008 @ 07:14 PM by future flow
reply to post by FlyersFan



you just said allot more eloquently what i was trying to say so i thank you this pastors message was not about hate and those who think it is may, and i say may as to not offend.....be personally offended thinking its black on white racism and that is not at all the case.


reply posted on 14-3-2008 @ 07:47 PM by Areal51
reply to post by TheAgentNineteen



Sounds like Pastor Wright would fit right here at ATS. He espouses his conspiracy theories the same way many ATS member do. He presents some things as fact when they may be questionable. However, what he also does is provide room for reflection. To me, he doesn't seem to preach to brainwash, he seems to preach to get the congregation to think. He's seems to provide information that will have the members thinking long and hard about the situation here in America. Also, I don't think he means in a limited way "Damn America", I think he means damn what America has become. His sermon is couched in the context of history. Much of that history that he espouses is true. Some of it, to my knowledge, has yet to be proven. I'm not apologizing for him, but, maybe he has read different books than I have read?

Again, I don't know what the fuss is all about. If a politician gave a speech like he did in the link provided in the third article, he or she might have a following at least as large as Ron Paul's.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Official Maine Caucus Results Thread!!
  2012 US Elections, Posted 6 hours ago, 74 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 17 hours ago, 69 replies