Another great piece of work Craig. Starred and Flagged.
I'm fairly convinced now more than ever, this was either a military jet painted to look like an AA passenger jet, or an actual AA passenger jet
rigged up to be able to deploy a Cruise missile, and then a subsequent flyover.
Especially after watching this video posted buy IvanZana: (pay close attention to the first 15 seconds, and look how quickly this thing can be
deployed.) Thise would explain some of the strange eye witness accounts as well, being that a cruise missile looks like a small while plane.
Also after watching 2 videos of what the aftermath looks like when one of these hits a reinforced concrete structure on a somewhat level angle. The
exit holes are identical in size, and again round. after going through a concrete structure made up of several walls. Too bad I can no longer find the
Then there's the fireball caught by the security camera is a very good match to the fireball that is created when a Cruise missile hits a hard
Last but not least theres the damage to the Pentagon, and the perfect circular exit hole. All pretty much in accordance to what you'd expect to see
if a Cruise missile hit the pentagon on the official flight path. Not a 767 made of aluminum. It wouldn't get passed the second reinforced wall, let
alone the 5-7 we are suppposed to believe it did. Maybe, and that a huge maybe, the engines could get through a couple of those newly re-inforced
walls, but not the amount we are led to believe. Also the engines were'nt even found that deep in the pentagon.
This supposed kinetic ball of fire that came from a 767 , again even if true, would lose a huge amount if not all of it's steam after hitting the
second inside wall of the 1st ring. It's like trying to fire an armor piercing bullet through 5 kevlar vests that are all spaced out 3 feet from each
other. That round would bounce off the second vest. You'd get a very different result if 5 vests worth of kevlar was all tightly packed together.
I'm sorry this ficticeous kinetic gaseous fireball isn't going to do that, I don't care if this 767 was doing 1,000 mph, and that side of the
Pentagon wasn't just recently re-inforced to stop missile attacks (the fact that this terrorist who couldn't even fly a Cessna hit that particular
side after circleing around is damning in and of itself) I mean sheesh, even this fake official story is so unbelievable, it insults every Americans
intelligence to even think anyone would buy it.
But I don't think the government thought it'd even hold up this long, it didn't need to, they just needed it to hold up long enough to pass a few
new Acts, and gain public support to invade Iraq. The fact that this myth is still believed today probably gives Bush and friends a pretty good
But to get back on topic, they would have done better to "plant" one of the engines outside the exit hole. Instead of a piece of landing gear. They
also should have forgotten the whole lightpole thing. I mean the more variables you have to account for , the more likely your ruse is going to be
uncovered, like it has been.
And before anyone asks, yes I am an expert on many types of military ordinance and the damage they can cause to various types of structures and other