Originally posted by Harlequin
reply to post by FredT
i can see china hitting running reactors tbh rendering vast area`s of the US similar to alot of the ukraine thank to the events at prypryat
I assume you mean with thier ICBM's?
If they target reactors on the west coast:
Columbia Generating Station, WA
San Onofre, Southern California
You have two. You still would not get the same effect as the cities I listed above in terms of casulties.
4 of the targets I listed have sig. military infrastructures to hit.
Hawaii home fo the Pacific Fleet
San Francisco bay Area: Silicoln Valley and Lawrence Livermore Nuclear Labs.
San Diego: USN fleet instalation
Seatle/Bremington: home to the pacific SSBN's
russia would not get involved - they don`t like either side , and are certainly not china`s best buddy - they have some of there own nukes
aimed there - but they would defend there own interest -
Sorry i was not suggesting outright help, but rather NOT helping China by suppling oil after they get blockaded. If they do then China will have alot
of oil and The US will not interdict supplies comming in from Russia (or at least while they are on Russian soil)
hmmm CBG`s - well all of the pacfic forces would be needed around china - thats the 6 carrier groups in the pacific (3rd and 7th fleet).
No doubt the whole fleet would be needed.
btw , i do`t think its been covered - but resupply for the ships at sea- the arleigh burkes are all nice and that - but 2 or 3 rapid air attacks and
the ammo bunkers will be empty - then what?
I agree that supply and logistics would always be an issue with the US fighting a war accross the Pacific. However, i doubt also that the USN would
trail thier coats super close to the chinese mainland thus reducing the number of missiles, and aircraft that could strike them, thus reducing the
amount of expendatures.
Also the USAF would also provide some cover with BARCAPS, and B-52's and B-1 launching harpoons and CALCMS against costal airfields and defence
instalations.