Originally posted by Scott Creighton
reply to post by PhotonEffect
Hey Scott,
SC: Be that as it may, we still have to accept that the C-14 dating of the mortar and timbers from within the pyramids (yes, some timbers have
actually been used in the construction as lintels or beams within a number of chambers), places the construction as contemporary with the Kings of the
4th Dynasty. This is incontrovertible.
If we're going to disagree on anything it'll have to be on the C14 tests. Amongst the pieces of evidence that we're told unequivocally link the
pyramids of Giza to the timeframe of the 4th Dynasty Kings, it's the C14 dates which I have one of the biggest problems with. Bear with me a minute
if you don't mind...
Unless there have been more C14 tests conducted recently that I'm unaware of, the results from the 1984 and 1995 dating are quite anomalous. What of
the samples of charcoal found in mortar taken from the upper portions of the GP that showed dates of ca 3800 bc? Samples of wood, ca 3100 bc? Dates
ranged all the way down to 2800 bc... I know that these anomalous results prompted the 2nd test, to show I imagine, that there must've been
something incorrectly done in the 1st test to arrive at such out of range dates...
But interestingly enough there were results from the 2nd test that matched (and corroborated) results from the 1st, and Khufu's results were still
off by some 100 or so years... So maybe the 1st test was telling the truth.
Now I know that the Egyptians were said to reuse old wood from other locations to burn in the fires, but if the 3800 bc dates are accurate, that means
they were reusing wood that was some 1200-1300 years old when constructing the GP. This does not compute.
Also, as I understand it, there is wood that is supposedly lodged in one of the shafts inside the GP that was initially discovered by Waynman Dixon.
His portion has gone missing, although there is still some left inside that for whatever reason hasn't been tested.
You mentioned testing of timbers found within chambers of the GP...I'd be interested to know more about this if you could point me in the right
direction.
SC: ....On such a plan it is reasonable to suppose that the base would be flat. On such a flat-based model G1 would appear larger AND TALLER
than G2, hence perhaps why Khufu chose G1 - it would have looked bigger and taller than G2 on the plan (perhaps a granite model of the Giza complex).
In this sense then we can see Khufu opting for prestige over practicality not realising, of course, that G2 would eventually eclipse his own grand
structure by virtue of being built on the highest part of the plateau.
Under these circumstances this could definitely be an explanation as to why Khufu would've 'built his' pyramid. I remember that you had mentioned
that this plan or codex was found inscribed somewhere, Saqqara maybe? Or that there is a reference to it somehwere? I'd be curious to read about
it.
SC:1) They were placed to indicate the latent Incentre and Circumcentre centroids. The ancient world understand only 3 centroids and I
speculate in the Giza Centroid Theory that through understanding these features as being indicative of their latent centroid, a very unique triangle
can be reconstructed,
Quite frankly Scott, I don't understand what those terms mean. I think you discussed them in one of you other threads, and again I would be very
interested to read up on this and try to wrap my head around it.
the apex of which points to a specific location in the Egyptian desert to the southwest of Menkaure. I recently attempted to reach this
location but it is entirely sealed off with walls, fences, watchtowers and guards (some bearing arms). Odd that you can have free access to the most
sacred structures in all Egypt but an area immediately adjacent to it is totlly sealed off.
Yes! I saw your pics. Odd indeed. Wonder what could be going on there...
2) They are a timing mechanism. They indicate 'shining stars' i.e. stars above the horizon. The middle pyramid (G2) is devoid of these
features thus perhaps indicating that its corresponding star - Al Nilam - has set below the horizon. We find such an arrangement of the Orion Belt
stars c.10,500BC on the SW horizon.
An interesting theory aswell. The concavities seem to form an 8 sided pyramid that could be said to resemble shining stars when looked at from above,
which is a curiosity.
SC: I am tending to lean towards John Anthony West's view on this one - the Sphinx may indeed predate the exisiting monuments. This is not
to say, however, that there could not have been earlier structures at Giza (of great antiquity) that were built over by the pyramids of the 4th
Dynasty Pharaohs.
Have you by chance read Colin Readers study of Giza?