It is the easiest way to do want you want under everyones nose and get away with it. And then call anyone who questions you a crackpot.
Originally posted by Bagel
This thread reminds me of something said in the movie "the matrix".
Apparently in order for the matrix to exist, the people plugged in would have to be aware of it's artificial nature on some level. In other words, they would choose what to believe, even if they were not consciously aware of the choice.
Maybe we are being presented with the facts in our forms of media, but are not fully aware of them.
Or maybe this nonsense is only true in the movies.![]()
Doesn't David Icke now believe in the artificial reality/matrix theory?
On the surface, Bostrom's simulation hypothesis is an example of a skeptical hypothesis, a proposal concerning the nature of reality put forward to question beliefs, and as such, there is a long history to the underlying thesis that reality is an illusion. This thesis can be dated back to Plato, arguably underpins the Mind-Body Dualism of Descartes, and is closely related to phenomenalism, a stance briefly adopted by Bertrand Russell. However, Bostrom has argued that this is not the case, and there are empirical reasons why the 'Simulation Hypothesis' might be valid. He suggests that if it is possible to simulate entire inhabited planets or even entire universes on a computer, and that such simulated people can be fully conscious, then the sheer number of such simulations likely to be produced by any sufficiently advanced civilization (taken together with his Strong Self-Sampling Assumption) makes it extremely likely that we are in fact currently living in such a simulation.