How can you tell Right from Wrong Evolutionists?, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 5-6-2008 @ 11:13 PM by optimistic skeptic
reply to post by theindependentjournal



Wow...I don't have much to say here, so I'll leave it at this..if you think killing is wrong, you need to re-read your book, my friend. The Old Testament, specifically. There is nothing but killing in that section of the bible.

Oh, I forgot - it's ok when it's in the name of God. Or if someone works on the Sabbath. Or if someone commits adultery. Or if someone simply disagrees with you.


reply posted on 25-6-2008 @ 09:59 AM by Methuselah
reply to post by optimistic skeptic



id say you need to reread the entire bible and understand what was going on rather than bashing something you have no understanding of.



reply posted on 25-6-2008 @ 10:12 AM by Methuselah
reply to post by Gigatronix



arent you assuming that they too had a brain capable of logic, reason, and deduction? you are assuming way too many things already about your so-called primative man. you are assuming they had enough logic to sustain their survival and the only evidence you have is the assumption that because we (humans) are here, that they must have existed based on the other assumption that we are descendants of them.

sounds like a fairy tale.

it makes much more sense to believe that we were given, built, designed with brains as intelligent as these. intelligence does not grow on its own without outside intelligence acting upon it.


reply posted on 25-6-2008 @ 10:23 AM by madnessinmysoul
reply to post by Methuselah



i call infinite recursion and BS

we have evidence that primitive man could make tools and do a lot of other neat-o things

...and the development of intelligence requiring the intervention of evidence creates infinite recursion....
so...um....yeah.


reply posted on 25-6-2008 @ 10:45 AM by Gigatronix
Originally posted by Methuselah
reply to
post by Gigatronix



arent you assuming that they too had a brain capable of logic, reason, and deduction? you are assuming way too many things already about your so-called primative man. you are assuming they had enough logic to sustain their survival and the only evidence you have is the assumption that because we (humans) are here, that they must have existed based on the other assumption that we are descendants of them.

sounds like a fairy tale.

it makes much more sense to believe that we were given, built, designed with brains as intelligent as these. intelligence does not grow on its own without outside intelligence acting upon it.
Dogs are capable of logic deduction and reason, I dont see any reason why early man couldnt manage the same. Early man built the first wheel, made the first fire, the first tools, the first language the first art, oh yeah and the first religion, I'm pretty sure they had some wits about them. We don't become intelligent without outside intelligence acting upon us? Duh, its called your environment. You learn by experience. Not every tribe of early man survived, not every tribe of early man was successful, but enough were that we continued to populate. You want to believe God was responsible? Thats fine with me, just dont call what I believe a fairy tale, lest you find your own beliefs assualted.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



How Are Plants Aware of the World Around Them?
  Posted 1 days ago with 5 member flags
The Genesis Code
  Posted 8 days ago with 4 member flags
Explain Diversity Reloaded
  Posted 9 days ago with 3 member flags
Tree of Life and Tree of Knowledge
  Posted 4 days ago with 3 member flags
The carrot (chicken or egg , vegetable version)
  Posted 3 days ago with 3 member flags
A theory of proof of a God
  Posted 9 days ago with 2 member flags
Eden: The Double Sided Coin
  Posted 3 days ago with 2 member flags
We are all connected with nature and The Universe IMO
  Posted 3 days ago with 2 member flags