Was This A Message From Extraterrestrials??, page 11
Pages: <<  8    9    10    11    12    13  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 153 times


reply posted on 14-3-2008 @ 09:32 AM by jbmitch
reply to post by Zelun


ah thanx, Denying possibilities severly limits what is and will be possible in future times. Eventually we will deny ourselves into extinction and never knew it was coming ,,,cheer ..enjoy your posts.




reply posted on 14-3-2008 @ 11:34 AM by michaeln
I have dowsed crop circles for a few years now, and was for some time Field Reasearch Officer for the crop circle magazine CCCS here in the UK,so I know a little about the subject of crop circles.The Earth Energy in any real/genuine crop circle is immense, it contains both radial and spiral energy thats starts right in the middle of the design shape and then moves away,and can be dowsed for hundreds of miles away, perhaps even further out than that even.Both 2002/3 I dowsed blindfolded to two nominated crop circles with the driver going the way I dowsed the energy ahead, AND arriving at the field where the formations appeared, with the one distance 98 miles, and the other being 95 miles away.The one formation was called hoaxed ( moire) and this made my blood boil, and the researcher should have known better, so as to make a point, I dowsed that distance blindfolded to prove it contained this special energy and was genuine....Anyway getting back to the thread, at the time and now I believe both the 2000 Chilbolton/2001 formations to be genuine, that is they contained this wonderful powerful energy that hoaxing CANNOT produce with their work.How any ALIEN people can induce this planitary energy to release I dont know,AS I see any genuine crop circle like any LIGHTNING STRIKE,where the inner energy of the planet rises to meet another force within the atmosphere or above striking downwards.The design left in the field I believe to be the left frequency of this mutual destruction of these two immense forces,like a SAND TRAY where a tuning fork has been placed against the tray to produce a pattern of that frequency/fork...The question I would ask is did in fact the ALIENS answer, or did the planet return the message that had been sent years before, Im still scratching my head on that problem.



reply posted on 14-3-2008 @ 04:20 PM by ArMaP
reply to post by Akuzar



How can you say that something is impossible in a thread that is about a possible answer carved on a crop field to a not very obvious message sent to space by means of a radio signal that had to be completely received to be reproduced and that lasted 1679 seconds and was not repeated?

As I have said many times, the fact that you may be incapable of doing it does not mean that nobody else can.

Also, we do not have any way of knowing if crop circles appear over night unless that exact area was photographed the day before. In at least the case I posted before, the circle was seen in two phases, the first made during a night, the second, completing the design, made on the next night.

Also, by not replying in the same manner as we sent the message (radio waves) this message has lost one of its elements, it was the wave length that connected the actual measurements with the numbers sent on the message.

PS: we should remember that the image posted on the opening post was not sent as we see it, this is a more accurate reproduction:


00000010101010000000000001010000010100000001001000100010001
00101100101010101010101010010010000000000000000000000000000
00000000011000000000000000000011010000000000000000000110100
00000000000000001010100000000000000000011111000000000000000
00000000000000000110000111000110000110001000000000000011001
00001101000110001100001101011111011111011111011111000000000
00000000000000000100000000000000000100000000000000000000000
00000100000000000000000111111000000000000011111000000000000
00000000000110000110000111000110001000000010000000001000011
01000011000111001101011111011111011111011111000000000000000
00000000000100000011000000000100000000000110000000000000001
00000110000000000111111000001100000011111000000000011000000
00000001000000001000000001000001000000110000000100000001100
00110000001000000000011000100001100000000000000011001100000
00000000110001000011000000000110000110000001000000010000001
00000000100000100000001100000000100010000000011000000001000
10000000001000000010000010000000100000001000000010000000000
00110000000001100000000110000000001000111010110000000000010
00000010000000000000010000011111000000000000100001011101001
01101100000010011100100111111101110000111000001101110000000
00101000001110110010000001010000011111100100000010100000110
00000100000110110000000000000000000000000000000000011100000
10000000000000011101010001010101010100111000000000101010100
00000000000000101000000000000001111100000000000000001111111
11000000000000111000000011100000000011000000000001100000001
10100000000010110000011001100000001100110000100010100000101
00010000100010010001001000100000000100010100010000000000001
00001000010000000000001000000000100000000000000100101000000
000001111001111101001111000


The line breaks were introduced by me because it is not possible to post a line with 1679 characters.


reply posted on 15-3-2008 @ 09:36 AM by Matyas
I have been watching this thread for a while now.

What I am about to say may not make sense, not immediately.

A 2D universe can support only one life form, because of curvature. The surface of our universe is a 2D universe. In a 2D universe there is no "real estate" to speak of.

A 3D universe can support many lifeforms, but just as a 2D universe is in reality a 3D universe because of curvature, ours is a 4D universe for the same reason. There is also much free room, so even if a high society can exist every 600 LY^3, only one out of a million planets could support life as ours does.

A 4D universe can support far, far more life than we can wrap our little pink brains around, and is also realistically 5D for the same reason once again. In a 4D universe time is curved, which would allow 3D and 4D intersections. Inanimate objects in our dimension could take on new characteristics with the increased degrees of freedom in a higher dimension. So life is far more prolific, and "real estate" even more vast.

Gravity is the culprit for this curvature, allowing even up to 10D universes to exist. Gravity, unlike sound, which cannot travel in a vacuum, and energy, which does not boast absolute depth penetration, is all pervasive. It vibrates to form all the worlds and they that dwell upon and within them. When the conditions are right for an intersection to occur, gravity is modulated to produce these "CCs", where the action takes place on a 2D plane, altering the organic content of the stalks.

We cannot even launch a boat or fly a plane without the conditions being just right, so when considering intraterrestial communication all parameters must match correctly.

So there are other worlds that boast life, and they are right here with us, not on some far flung star system, unless we are just bound and determined to meet folks just like us. But then we would be in for a real lonely journey.

To our miraculous residents, known by many names, most recently as ETs, I raise my glass in toast, may our future relations be peaceful and fruitful.


reply posted on 15-3-2008 @ 10:23 AM by ArMaP
reply to post by HighDefinitionFilms



At the speed of light (which I think is the speed of radio transmissions), 27 years mean that the radio signal travelled 27 light-years. To get a response at the speed of light then that distance is halved, 13.5 light-years.

What I would like to know is what is the real meaning of "very narrow funnel of the sky". How many star systems are/were inside that "funnel"?

Also, why people talk about this as if that Arecibo transmission was some kind of secret? How many people knew about it and what was transmitted in the year that that crop circle appeared, 2001?


reply posted on 17-3-2008 @ 12:48 PM by freighttrain
reply to post by synikster



TNX for posting, someone else just opened a thread here on how "sound" frequencies can change/fix our DNA structure! Very interesting! I am a true believe on this, it's no accident we all like some sort of music, it's the sound vibration that can put us in peace!


reply posted on 18-3-2008 @ 01:45 PM by JustMike
reply to post by hidatsa


Hi Hidatsa,

thanks for the additional info...Now I see what you are getting at. Yes, it's an angle that hadn't occurred to me (and I doubt that I'm alone in that respect). Many thanks for giving us something else to ponder.


reply posted on 20-3-2008 @ 02:14 AM by MAC269
Anomalies in crops have been around for hundreds of years.

So I don’t think they are all a hoax

However I am sure this one is, I have seen many beautiful designs in crops but I do pity the poor farmer they really must P him off. But hats off the artists.

So who had the really bright idea of sending a signal to a star cluster 25,000LY’s away, taking a round trip of 50,000LY. He should win the Nobel Prize right?? Who in 50,000 years would even recognize the answer??? It just seams daft to me. Apart from the fact that Steven Hawking has said that this is not the very brightest idea’s in the first place and being that he is one of the brightest minds on the planet right now I would tend to consider his argument. His point is that who ever we may just get in touch with just might not be so friendly. Now looking for signals with SETI would seam to be ok just knowing that there is intelligence out there. The danger would only come if they find us.

Now ET being behind the CC’s anyway the argument being that they want to reach us all rather than just a few scientists who are likely to keep it under cover or at least they will when our governments hear about it anyway. Like receiving the instruction on how to build a power source that costs nothing and is renewable without harming the atmosphere would turn into a weather balloon. Well they most likely have done it before.

If ET wants to tell us all he is out there he will interrupt the news at ten. In my very humble opinion he will not do it in corn and of a fashion that only the scientists could possible understand. ET would want to know something about us so he would want to talk only to the brightest among us I can’t imagine he would want to converse with devotee’s of the latest soap operas.

After all that very good thread keep them coming.
Pages: <<  8    9    10    11    12    13  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 18 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 14 days ago with 122 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 19 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 16 days ago with 85 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 16 days ago with 83 member flags