Not to get off the subject, but I believe it was Zeitgeist the movie that wen't pretty in depth into religion and the ages ect, and although I 've
seen it twive, the part about the change to the age of Aquarius happens in the first 20-30 minutes of the movie, so I'm not sure.
But I remember the narrator saying the Age of Aquarius will start sometime much, much later than 2012. Something like 2360 or 2630. I don't quite
remember though as I said it was in the beginning of the movie.
Well here's a link on Wikipedia:
en.wikipedia.org...
which has about 4 different groups of scientists and institutions claiming that The New age (The age of Aquarius) will begin no sooner than the year
2600, the three others all say a after that, but before the year 2700.
Perhaps if one was going by ancient Mayan calendars, and as we know paths of stars can change over the course of thousands of years, I think?
Perhaps back then, they caculated the new age to begin in 2012.
But everytime I hear the New Age starts in 2012, it just sounds like more bunk thrown on top of this "next" end of the world scenario. Which we've
seen come and go thousands of times over the history of civilized man. But personally I don't think the start of the new age should be use to bolster
the 2012 myth. Because well, it is from my findings untrue. Plus I don't believe in end of the world prophecies.
The day will come, and no one will predict it.
Just like not a SINGLE psychic, like sylvia Brown or James Van Prague, or any of the other scam artist, couldn't predict 9/11. It's all bunk. and
2021, is the biggest one in my lifetime since Y2k, and following that was back in 1988 it was predicted Long Island was supposed to sink off into the
Atlantic ocean. There are a couple more mundane ones, but thats quite a few decent size end of the world scenarios that were supposed to take place in
my 30 years here on earth, that didn't amount to anything.
I'm fairlt sure the calendar will turn January 1, 2013. When I'm 43-44, ack! Now THAT scares me
But back to the point of the thread, , I think it's a hoax. How did the poster on you tube even get the transcript for it,I can't here but a few
words here and there unless I'm watching the subtitles. I think they should arrest the guy who uploaded it, because he obviously knows what was said
word for word more or less, by the "alien". Unless he used some tools, to clean it up and seperate the voice from the stations backround noise ect.
I didn't read the description, he probably says that.
But no , he most likely cleaned it up. But I'd put this in the prankster/hoaxster bin, before the disinfo bin. I think the disinfo done by a
government woulda been done alot better, and heard by a larger audience.
Unless it was a small scale test to see the reactions, after the crazyness that followed War of the Worlds on the Radio.
Who knows.