This topic is in the Political Conspiracies discussion forum.  (rss)


Barak Hussein Obama, Terrorist friend!


<<  1    2    3  >>



reply posted on 12-3-2008 @ 09:08 PM by NGC2736


Enough discussion of each other. Let's get on topic and STAY THERE.

Enough said?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2008 @ 09:15 PM by RRconservative


One of Barack Hussein Obama's top goals is to get us out of Iraq.

One of Al-Queda's top goals is to get us out of Iraq.

Hmmmmm.

Part of being friends is having common interests.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2008 @ 09:24 PM by The Quiet Professional





reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2008 @ 09:31 PM by BlueTriangle



Originally posted by Karlhungis
Dan Rather gets canned for running a report that was true but shed the Furor er... President...


Oops!! You accidently showed your true colors on that one. That was a false report based on a forged document. It's been proven over and over. You're calling fox biased?? Pot, meet kettle.

Does anybody have an opinion on the actual article?? It indicates that he sat with a confessed terrorist. It also indicates that he is anti-Israel, which could certainly hurt the predominantly democrat jewish vote.

This quote



Obama served on the Wood's Fund board alongside William C. Ayers, a member of the Weathermen terrorist group which sought to overthrow of the U.S. government and took responsibility for bombing the U.S. Capitol in 1971.

Ayers, who still serves on the Woods Fund board, contributed $200 to Obama's senatorial campaign fund and has served on panels with Obama at numerous public speaking engagements. Ayers admitted to involvement in the bombings of U.S. governmental buildings in the 1970s.



is particularly damaging. The obama campaign took funds from a confessed terrorist??

Then again, does the average American really care at this point? I think most people are either voting based on race/sex or voting purely party line.


[edit on 12-3-2008 by BlueTriangle]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2008 @ 09:55 PM by RRconservative



Originally posted by The Quiet Professional

If Ron Paul doesn't win the election, I sure as hell am not sticking around to find out how bad Hillary or McCain will fukup. I will be out of here faster than you can say HOLY SHIITE.


Note to Ron Paul fanatics...The Ron Paul Fantasy is OVER. Ron Paul racked up a astonishing, mind blowing total of 21 delegates. The total number of delegates needed to win is 1,191. John McCain (a good friend to Democrats) has a total of 1,325 delegates. 1,325 delegates is more than 1,191 and a whole lot more than 21. GIVE IT UP!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2008 @ 10:08 PM by sharati


reply to post by Rockpuck



Thank you for that bit of info. Also, To your I used to like McCain statement. I don't mean to be rude, but, like I said in an earlier post, in my opinion, he is a mindless drone, a puppet with Bush pulling the strings.

but still, thank you. That way I don't have to feel the need to retalliate so much.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2008 @ 10:15 PM by sharati



Originally posted by RRconservative

Originally posted by The Quiet Professional


Note to Ron Paul fanatics...The Ron Paul Fantasy is OVER. Ron Paul racked up a astonishing, mind blowing total of 21 delegates. The total number of delegates needed to win is 1,191. John McCain (a good friend to Democrats) has a total of 1,325 delegates. 1,325 delegates is more than 1,191 and a whole lot more than 21. GIVE IT UP!



Ron Paul May be over, but in all truth, he was the best candidate for president. I have said it before and I will say it again, McCain is a Drone a puppet with Bush pulling the strings.

furthermore, This thread was started because I wanted to know if someone could confirm or deny the thread that I had started... That is what I want to know. Not who will win the presidential election. or who have the most delegates.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2008 @ 10:26 PM by sy.gunson


Actually those trashing Obama here by slinging mud at his name are practicing selective memory recall...

Either that or are blinkered to only see what they want to see.

They carefully avoid what Obama actually says.

Obama calls for pulling out of Iraq to concentrate on rooting out the heart of militant Islam in Afghanistan. That's where the real enemy is.

Unlike GW Bush who selectively tailored the facts on WMD and terrorist activity to mislead congress into voting for invasion of Iraq.

Al Qaeda did not exist in Saddam's Ba'athist Iraq. Saddam did not tolerate Islamic revolutionaries, but then hey... those who trash Obama don't seem much interested in the truth.

The fact that Al Qaeda is now in Iraq is because Bush suckered USA into a massive sacrifice for nothing. That's why USA's dollar is falling so fast that other countries are scrambling to buy oil in other currencies.

Bush should go down in history as the idiot who destroyed the US economy.

Obama is no fool. He sees the huge harm Iraq is causing the US economy and US foreign relations. That does not make him a supporter of terrorism except to people with distorted thinking.

[edit on 12-3-2008 by sy.gunson]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2008 @ 10:39 PM by RRconservative


reply to post by sharati



You must have missed my first post, since you chose not to respond to it.

Since you missed it........

One of Barack Hussein Obama's top goals is to get us out of Iraq.

One of Al-Queda's top goals is to get us out of Iraq.

Hmmmmm.

Part of being friends is having common interests.


Ron Paul fanatics, have been known to show up in all types of threads. They have got to realize that they have been soundly defeated. Some still thinks he has a chance to be elected President. Ron Paul Fantasy OVER!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-3-2008 @ 12:22 PM by kosmicjack


reply to post by Rockpuck



Does anyone actually bother to read before they flame? My comment about posting to smear was addressed to the post above mine, "First Sargent Kent", or whatever his name is. Apparently the OP didn't get it either.

I feel the premise set forth in the OP is a real stretch. If any part of the insinuation - which is what it is - were true, as characterized, Billary would have used it long before now to discredit Obama in order to save herself the time and the money. But it's not, so his adversaries are reduced to slandering his good name. Sad.

As this thread has degraded into a conservative/liberal/independent spit-ball fight, I'm out.



[edit on 13/3/08 by kosmicjack]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-3-2008 @ 06:09 PM by sharati


IS IT RIGHT TO HAVE THE INFORMATION THAT IS WRITTEN PROVEN AND SAID. IS BARAK OBAMA TERRORIST OR FRIEND!!!??? THAT IS WHAT I WANT TO KNOW OPINIONS!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-3-2008 @ 05:43 PM by VeeTwin60


reply to post by RRconservative



Well, what should we do then, cheify? Vote for a douche or a turd sandwich ???

I'm sorry, but I will NOT vote for any of the three that are in the spotlight. Not a one of them share my beliefs, and not a one of them are going to be good for this Great Country that we live in.

I will vote in November, but I will write in Ron Paul. Will he win, probably not. I'm not so diluted to believe he has a chance, but at least I will be voting my conscience.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 22-3-2008 @ 11:41 PM by 911Hoagler


the bankers who control husseinosama just want to start a holy war to make lots of money. they have military companies they own to fight the bad fight, and they will sell weapons to both sides. while good christians spend billions on weapons, the same weapons will be sold to the diper heads for only thousands. this is not hate speech, it is the truth:
what religion wont be affected by christian, muslim, jew war? easterners. asians, chinese and japanese specifically. they want the west and mideast to destroy each other, so they can take over the UN, and march into our countries and enslave all of us who are not asian descent.
a vote for hussein, a vote for clintong, or a vote for mccane is a vote for slavery to our chinese masters.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 28-4-2008 @ 11:45 PM by sharati


I don't want any of these three in Office either, as I said in an Earlier post, I, aswell, want Dr. Ron Paul in Office. But, he didn't get the media attention needed and was roughly thrown out like a bag of potatoes. (for lack of a better term) I just wanted to know If anyone else thought about what I said in the beginning of this thread about Barak's Ties with Terrorists?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 28-4-2008 @ 11:52 PM by jetxnet


Barak's support of terrorists against the US are true. He is everything the US isn't or shouldn't be.

It has nothing to do with Fox, they just got ahold of some good valid material to further discredit Barak, and rightfully so.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-5-2008 @ 11:41 PM by SevenThunders


Given Obama's ties to various hate America radicals such as his former pastor, why should this be a surprise? The group Muslims for Obama who had a link on Obama's site spew all kinds of hate America and anti-semitic, pro terrorist propaganda. Obama is a Trojan horse, don't fall for him. I view him as a mini-antichrist - phony charisma with a hidden agenda.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-5-2008 @ 11:59 PM by laiguana


reply to post by SevenThunders



I agree that Obama is a master-BSer. Of course, as you mentioned, this only pushes the notion that he is an extremist. The thing is Obama is getting a lot of hype, especially on the internet and by younger voters who are easily moved by hypothetical ideologies.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 7-5-2008 @ 10:12 PM by ambigram


YOU MEAN HE DONATED A WHOLE 200 DOLLARS TO HE SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN? WOW!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 01:31 AM by Rubyteacup


Senator Obama has his own agenda. I do not believe that he is concerned with the interests of the American people, regardless of color. He has spent 20 years being associated with a church by a reverend who is anti-American and racist.

In my opinion, Senator Obama is a willing pawn (meaning he has his eyes set on his own specific goals) by the likes of Fahrakan (sp.?) and Wright. Bad publicity is better than no publicity!!! I think all these men are working in tandem to acquire each of their individual ambitions. I watched a youtube video where Fahrakan stated that Obama was, "a good person," but would not be a good leader because of the powers that be (this is paraphrased). You must watch it to get the full affect.

I think Obama is a Senator because of his associations with these men and others. While he has so-called distanced himself, they are his associates and I do not believe he has disconnected the links and ties he has with them. No doubt, there is a lot of activities behind the scenes that we won't hear about until it is too late.

Also, I have never seen Oprah Winfrey give her endorcement to any candidate before, until now. However, I do not keep track of all things political. I did read that she was connected with the Trinity Church, but left sometime during the 1990s. I was so disappointed. I now feel that what Senator Obama is doing by distancing himself from past known associations with these individuals is exactly what Oprah Winfrey did in the 1990s. There isn't anyone at this status who is a self-made man or woman. Fahrakan and Wright are extremists! Right now, they are doing the bad cop/good cop routines and playing the devil's advocate. As I said before, "bad publicity is better than no publicity!!!"

In my opinion, Winfrey has unlimited funds to finance Obama's campaign in whatever "back door" way that anyone might be able to do.

I have always admired Oprah Winfrey and I feel let down because of her past affiliation with the Trinity Church. The fact that she is backing Obama who is squashing his known associations with Fahrakan and especially Reverend Wright (20 years) just makes me think that Obama and Winfrey got where they are because of these men and their associations with others and groups. I am very, very nervous and, since Obama might be the Democratic nominee and possibly president, I think that Americans will be used beyond anything that I can even imagine right now. At this point, I do not believe that Senator Obama is a friend to the American population. Is he a terrorist??? I am frightened at the thought!!!!!!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 01:42 AM by jetxnet


Most closet Muslim radicals have the middle name "Hussein". It sure doesn't take a Rocket Scientist (or Computer Scientist rather ) to figure this out.

Get your face out of Obama's shorts and start looking at the facts.

NObama 2008



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2    3  >>







Find More:





Top Topics Right Now:






Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:

































ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

, ,
















ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 1.040 seconds
Page processed in 0.766 seconds
8 total database queries (2)









( The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC. )





thread