 |
reply posted on 12-3-2008 @ 09:08 PM by NGC2736
|
Enough discussion of each other. Let's get on topic and STAY THERE.
Enough said?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-3-2008 @ 09:15 PM by RRconservative
|
One of Barack Hussein Obama's top goals is to get us out of Iraq.
One of Al-Queda's top goals is to get us out of Iraq.
Hmmmmm.
Part of being friends is having common interests.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-3-2008 @ 09:24 PM by The Quiet Professional
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-3-2008 @ 09:31 PM by BlueTriangle
|
Originally posted by Karlhungis
Dan Rather gets canned for running a report that was true but shed the Furor er... President... 
Oops!! You accidently showed your true colors on that one. That was a false report based on a forged document. It's been proven over and over.
You're calling fox biased?? Pot, meet kettle.
Does anybody have an opinion on the actual article?? It indicates that he sat with a confessed terrorist. It also indicates that he is anti-Israel,
which could certainly hurt the predominantly democrat jewish vote.
This quote
Obama served on the Wood's Fund board alongside William C. Ayers, a member of the Weathermen terrorist group which sought to overthrow of the U.S.
government and took responsibility for bombing the U.S. Capitol in 1971.
Ayers, who still serves on the Woods Fund board, contributed $200 to Obama's senatorial campaign fund and has served on panels with Obama at numerous
public speaking engagements. Ayers admitted to involvement in the bombings of U.S. governmental buildings in the 1970s.

is particularly damaging. The obama campaign took funds from a confessed terrorist??
Then again, does the average American really care at this point? I think most people are either voting based on race/sex or voting purely party
line.
[edit on 12-3-2008 by BlueTriangle]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-3-2008 @ 09:55 PM by RRconservative
|
Originally posted by The Quiet Professional
If Ron Paul doesn't win the election, I sure as hell am not sticking around to find out how bad Hillary or McCain will fukup. I will be out of here
faster than you can say HOLY SHIITE. 
Note to Ron Paul fanatics...The Ron Paul Fantasy is OVER. Ron Paul racked up a astonishing, mind blowing total of 21 delegates. The total number of
delegates needed to win is 1,191. John McCain (a good friend to Democrats) has a total of 1,325 delegates. 1,325 delegates is more than 1,191 and a
whole lot more than 21. GIVE IT UP!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-3-2008 @ 10:08 PM by sharati
|
reply to post by Rockpuck
Thank you for that bit of info. Also, To your I used to like McCain statement. I don't mean to be rude, but, like I said in an earlier post, in my
opinion, he is a mindless drone, a puppet with Bush pulling the strings.
but still, thank you. That way I don't have to feel the need to retalliate so much.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-3-2008 @ 10:15 PM by sharati
|
Originally posted by RRconservative
Originally posted by The Quiet Professional
Note to Ron Paul fanatics...The Ron Paul Fantasy is OVER. Ron Paul racked up a astonishing, mind blowing total of 21 delegates. The total number of
delegates needed to win is 1,191. John McCain (a good friend to Democrats) has a total of 1,325 delegates. 1,325 delegates is more than 1,191 and a
whole lot more than 21. GIVE IT UP! 
Ron Paul May be over, but in all truth, he was the best candidate for president. I have said it before and I will say it again, McCain is a Drone a
puppet with Bush pulling the strings.
furthermore, This thread was started because I wanted to know if someone could confirm or deny the thread that I had started... That is what I want
to know. Not who will win the presidential election. or who have the most delegates.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-3-2008 @ 10:26 PM by sy.gunson
|

Actually those trashing Obama here by slinging mud at his name are practicing selective memory recall...
Either that or are blinkered to only see what they want to see.
They carefully avoid what Obama actually says.
Obama calls for pulling out of Iraq to concentrate on rooting out the heart of militant Islam in Afghanistan. That's where the real enemy is.
Unlike GW Bush who selectively tailored the facts on WMD and terrorist activity to mislead congress into voting for invasion of Iraq.
Al Qaeda did not exist in Saddam's Ba'athist Iraq. Saddam did not tolerate Islamic revolutionaries, but then hey... those who trash Obama don't
seem much interested in the truth.
The fact that Al Qaeda is now in Iraq is because Bush suckered USA into a massive sacrifice for nothing. That's why USA's dollar is falling so fast
that other countries are scrambling to buy oil in other currencies.
Bush should go down in history as the idiot who destroyed the US economy.
Obama is no fool. He sees the huge harm Iraq is causing the US economy and US foreign relations. That does not make him a supporter of terrorism
except to people with distorted thinking.
[edit on 12-3-2008 by sy.gunson]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-3-2008 @ 10:39 PM by RRconservative
|
reply to post by sharati
You must have missed my first post, since you chose not to respond to it.
Since you missed it........
One of Barack Hussein Obama's top goals is to get us out of Iraq.
One of Al-Queda's top goals is to get us out of Iraq.
Hmmmmm.
Part of being friends is having common interests.
Ron Paul fanatics, have been known to show up in all types of threads. They have got to realize that they have been soundly defeated. Some still
thinks he has a chance to be elected President. Ron Paul Fantasy OVER!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-3-2008 @ 12:22 PM by kosmicjack
|
reply to post by Rockpuck
Does anyone actually bother to read before they flame? My comment about posting to smear was addressed to the post above mine, "First Sargent Kent",
or whatever his name is.  Apparently the OP didn't get it either.
I feel the premise set forth in the OP is a real stretch. If any part of the insinuation - which is what it is - were true, as characterized, Billary
would have used it long before now to discredit Obama in order to save herself the time and the money. But it's not, so his adversaries are reduced
to slandering his good name. Sad.
As this thread has degraded into a conservative/liberal/independent spit-ball fight, I'm out.
[edit on 13/3/08 by kosmicjack]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-3-2008 @ 06:09 PM by sharati
|
IS IT RIGHT TO HAVE THE INFORMATION THAT IS WRITTEN PROVEN AND SAID. IS BARAK OBAMA TERRORIST OR FRIEND!!!??? THAT IS WHAT I WANT TO KNOW OPINIONS!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-3-2008 @ 05:43 PM by VeeTwin60
|
reply to post by RRconservative
Well, what should we do then, cheify? Vote for a douche or a turd sandwich ???
I'm sorry, but I will NOT vote for any of the three that are in the spotlight. Not a one of them share my beliefs, and not a one of them are going
to be good for this Great Country that we live in.
I will vote in November, but I will write in Ron Paul. Will he win, probably not. I'm not so diluted to believe he has a chance, but at least I
will be voting my conscience.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-3-2008 @ 11:41 PM by 911Hoagler
|
the bankers who control husseinosama just want to start a holy war to make lots of money. they have military companies they own to fight the bad
fight, and they will sell weapons to both sides. while good christians spend billions on weapons, the same weapons will be sold to the diper heads for
only thousands. this is not hate speech, it is the truth:
what religion wont be affected by christian, muslim, jew war? easterners. asians, chinese and japanese specifically. they want the west and mideast to
destroy each other, so they can take over the UN, and march into our countries and enslave all of us who are not asian descent.
a vote for hussein, a vote for clintong, or a vote for mccane is a vote for slavery to our chinese masters.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-4-2008 @ 11:45 PM by sharati
|
I don't want any of these three in Office either, as I said in an Earlier post, I, aswell, want Dr. Ron Paul in Office. But, he didn't get the
media attention needed and was roughly thrown out like a bag of potatoes. (for lack of a better term) I just wanted to know If anyone else thought
about what I said in the beginning of this thread about Barak's Ties with Terrorists?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-4-2008 @ 11:52 PM by jetxnet
|
Barak's support of terrorists against the US are true. He is everything the US isn't or shouldn't be.
It has nothing to do with Fox, they just got ahold of some good valid material to further discredit Barak, and rightfully so.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-5-2008 @ 11:41 PM by SevenThunders
|
Given Obama's ties to various hate America radicals such as his former pastor, why should this be a surprise? The group Muslims for Obama who had a
link on Obama's site spew all kinds of hate America and anti-semitic, pro terrorist propaganda. Obama is a Trojan horse, don't fall for him. I
view him as a mini-antichrist - phony charisma with a hidden agenda.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-5-2008 @ 11:59 PM by laiguana
|
reply to post by SevenThunders
I agree that Obama is a master-BSer. Of course, as you mentioned, this only pushes the notion that he is an extremist. The thing is Obama is getting a
lot of hype, especially on the internet and by younger voters who are easily moved by hypothetical ideologies.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-5-2008 @ 10:12 PM by ambigram
|
YOU MEAN HE DONATED A WHOLE 200 DOLLARS TO HE SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN? WOW!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 01:31 AM by Rubyteacup
|
Senator Obama has his own agenda. I do not believe that he is concerned with the interests of the American people, regardless of color. He has spent
20 years being associated with a church by a reverend who is anti-American and racist.
In my opinion, Senator Obama is a willing pawn (meaning he has his eyes set on his own specific goals) by the likes of Fahrakan (sp.?) and Wright.
Bad publicity is better than no publicity!!! I think all these men are working in tandem to acquire each of their individual ambitions. I watched a
youtube video where Fahrakan stated that Obama was, "a good person," but would not be a good leader because of the powers that be (this is
paraphrased). You must watch it to get the full affect.
I think Obama is a Senator because of his associations with these men and others. While he has so-called distanced himself, they are his associates
and I do not believe he has disconnected the links and ties he has with them. No doubt, there is a lot of activities behind the scenes that we won't
hear about until it is too late.
Also, I have never seen Oprah Winfrey give her endorcement to any candidate before, until now. However, I do not keep track of all things political.
I did read that she was connected with the Trinity Church, but left sometime during the 1990s. I was so disappointed. I now feel that what Senator
Obama is doing by distancing himself from past known associations with these individuals is exactly what Oprah Winfrey did in the 1990s. There isn't
anyone at this status who is a self-made man or woman. Fahrakan and Wright are extremists! Right now, they are doing the bad cop/good cop routines
and playing the devil's advocate. As I said before, "bad publicity is better than no publicity!!!"
In my opinion, Winfrey has unlimited funds to finance Obama's campaign in whatever "back door" way that anyone might be able to do.
I have always admired Oprah Winfrey and I feel let down because of her past affiliation with the Trinity Church. The fact that she is backing Obama
who is squashing his known associations with Fahrakan and especially Reverend Wright (20 years) just makes me think that Obama and Winfrey got where
they are because of these men and their associations with others and groups. I am very, very nervous and, since Obama might be the Democratic
nominee and possibly president, I think that Americans will be used beyond anything that I can even imagine right now. At this point, I do not
believe that Senator Obama is a friend to the American population. Is he a terrorist??? I am frightened at the thought!!!!!!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 01:42 AM by jetxnet
|
Most closet Muslim radicals have the middle name "Hussein". It sure doesn't take a Rocket Scientist (or Computer Scientist rather  ) to figure
this out.
Get your face out of Obama's shorts and start looking at the facts.
NObama 2008
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |