Barak Hussein Obama, Terrorist friend!

Just recently on Fox News I was watching Hannity and he started talking about Barak Obama. Well, in this video it is said that Barak Obama is Friends with terrorists.



(sited: www.worldnetdaily.com... )

There is a Video here that has plenty of information about Barak Hussein Obama, and His Connections With Weather Underground.



(Sited: stoptheaclu.com... )

If This is True and Barak is a Terrorist Helper, Are we sure that we really want him to become President of the U.S.A.

I was watching that too and about threw up on myself. Fox news, along with Sean Hannity are a bunch of bush&mccain lovers and will do anything to help the republicans win. And throwing this information up for interpretation (which most people dont do and take it as fact-look at the picture of him, rumors about being muslim, and mocking his middle name) is how they sway voters.... Tis sad

It cracks me up whenever I see the use of his middle name. When you see it, you know that it is some smear campaign by repulicans or their stooges. I (I am ashamed to admit) was listening to the Drudge report last week on the way to work and the entire show was dedicated to smearing Obama. They stepped it up a notch this time though and they were using his mothers name to smear him. Suggesting that we couldn't possibly elect someone who's mother is named Stanley. Seriously. He suggested that the long term psychological effects of being raised by a mother with a man's name could not be measured or fully understood, but are very real.

Let's see, should we be concerned about any long term psychological effects from... I don't know... years in a Vietnemese POW camp? Nope. Should we be concerned about the irreversable damage of hearing your mother refered to as "Stanley"? ABSOLUTELY!

I really hope that I live to see the day when we can look back at this time in history and laugh at the absolute insanity of it all. I truley hope that the idiots at Faux news will be a joke for years to come. I mean really, why are they allowed to air this crap? Dan Rather gets canned for running a report that was true but shed the Furor er... President in a bad light, but these morons can call Obama a terrorist based off of nothing more substantial than his middle name and nobody cares.

This election is even more disgusting than the last.

Obama's slime, but moreso from blindly supporting Israel than this alleged terrorist support. We have no good choices. Boycott these elections!

I wouldn't be surprised if Obama is slime. Like you said though, we have no good choices. Pick your poison, Obama is slime, Clinton is scum and McCain is crap. Which do you choose?

I think the only thing pushing me towards Obama are little things like Fox News smearing him. If he is an enemy of Faux and Friends, then he must be better than the other 2.

This post was not generated simply because of his middle name, it generated, because of long time ties with terrorists of the past, Karlhungis. I wasn't discriminating him simply because of his middle name, He has the worst name possible for a human in these times His first name sounds like IRAQ, his middle name is Hussein, which people tie him with Saddam hussein, and his Last name is Obama, which sounds incredibly like Osama. It is not his fault for his name. I posted this because of his TIES WITH TERRORISTS, that is it.

I think these ignorant posts are a sign of desperation by the other two candidates and their status quo, business-as-usual, Washington-insider minions. It's really disgusting and hopefully intelligent citizens will recognize and reject these pathetic efforts.

All of the talking heads and pundits are suggesting that Obama needs to strike back by going negative as well. I think that would be a mistake. He needs to stay on course and offer a civilized and rational alternative to politics as usual. However, I think all of his surrogates and supporters should get out an pummel Billary and McCrazy with any and everything that sticks.

The fact of the matter is this: McCain has publicly stated that we need to be in Iraq for a "100 years" if necessary, so how motivated do you think he will really be to get out? Additionally, he has stated that the Economy is not his "strong point". HELLO! How do you think Middle America will feel about those two head-up-the-a$$ statements? It's past his bed-time.

Furthermore, Hillary will mean 24 years of a Bush/Clinton dynasty because it will basically be a two-fer - only Bill will have even more time on his hands while in the White House. Let's not even speak of the legacy of dead, jailed or betrayed people they have left on their march to power.

What politican hasn't taken money from someone questionable or at the very least from someone whom he regretted? Do you even know why they take it? Because people are so easily swayed by tripe like this and so candidates are forced to counter even the most specious and slandering claims as well as mount huge efforts via all forms of media. You get the candidate you buy.

So this leaves me to wonder - Who does your post serve? Clinton or McCain?

Why is it never brought up that Bush and his family are good friends of the Bin Ladens through the Cargyle group?

reply to post by kosmicjack

---

To your post I tell you this, I support neither. In All actuality I have been voting for Ron Paul the whole way, and when I heard on the news that there was rumor that he was leaving the presidential candidacy I was upset.

Furthermore, I could careless about the 24 year that you are speaking of... But, when Clinton, Bill, that is was president our economy was in the Red our economy was Thriving. I do not want Hillary to become president and that is strange, because I am a female, and probably should support the female candidate.

As far as Mr. Obama, I wasn't stating that he WAS a terrorist, I was simply posting this because It is what I seen on the news... and there is proof in his past to prove this post. I think that if there wasn't so much strife in our country... and I do not mean economy I mean country, this world would be great to have a black president. It would prove that we as Americans have finally put all that assinine crap from the past behind us, about slavery and being overly rascist. Though, we are not.

As for McCain, He is a simple minded drone, that I don't think should have ever been in any part of the government. He is basically a puppet with Bush pulling th strings. I think he needs to drop out.

Now as I said in the beginning, I have and will follow Ron Paul whether he drops out or not, simply because He, in my opinion is the best runner. I know he will not get the win, and I am not wasting False hope that he will. I simply posted this so that others would see what a lot of the world sees.

It is your choice to believe, I have my right to post and I will continue to use that right, unless, someone plans on taking it away from me.

[edit on 10/2/2007 by sharati]

Mod Edit: Profanity/Circumvention Of Censors – Please Review This Link.

[edit on 10/3/2008 by watch_the_rocks]

I was simply pointing out that whenever you see anyone use Obama's middle name, you know that it is going to be a smear. I can't remember the last time I heard George Walker Bush, we wouldn't ever hear it if his father didn't have the same name. I have never heard Hillary's middle name, I don't even know what it is. Yet, thanks to our friends at Faux and other right wing smear campaigns, we are all well aware that Obama's middle name is Hussein.

BTW, I am / was a Ron Paul supporter as well. It is sad that a candidate like him will never really have an honest shot though.

reply to post by Karlhungis

---

Paul especially won't have a good shot now that he's dropped out.

reply to post by chromatico

---

Honestly, his chances really aren't any different now than they ever were. With no support from the media, he never had a shot. It is funny, durring the primary elections, his name was never on a single CNN headline. Yet, when he decided to drop out, there were multiple stories.

reply to post by Karlhungis

---

I saw plenty of CNN interviews. Honestly, I think Libertarians were always a tiny minority, just so dedicated that they appeared to be bigger than they really were.

Why would you listen to anything Sean Hannity says? Every little word that comes from his huge cesspool of a mouth is crafted to aid his or his puppet master's agenda.

You should do your own research on the candidates and listen to nothing anyone in the media says about anything. Its sad that people would vote for Obama because they are black and so is he, or that women vote for Hillary simply because she is a woman. Honestly are we as a nation this pathetic?

Ah....stupid question.

God help us all

I was in Valero and I read the same article (well the article that was published and not the television broadcast. I was more interested in the gay love affair. Just wasn't sure if it was ATS etique.

reply to post by First Sergeant Kent A. Tr

---

These sorts of posts don't really surprise me anymore, especially from newly joined members whose likely only purpose for logging in was a hit and run against Obama.

reply to post by kosmicjack

---

My history with ATS isn't just to take a perverbial kick at Obama. and it bothers me that Cretins would say something along those lines. If you would back track what I have said in other posts it has mostly nothing to do with politics. The Very first thing I posted on here was a theory of mine about everything equalling four.

I am not a huge political person, and assuming I am does what my mother has said since I was a child to ass/u/me makes an A$$ out of YOU (u) and ME. Don't judge people based on one post. that is how people get labled CRETINS!

Ok, folks, let's try to stay on topic.

This thread should be about Sen. Obama, not each other.

Curious? All my life I have been told don't believe anything you hear, only half of what you see, and about a third of what you read. Why is it now that when you read some something it isn't credible anymore, and still nothing you hear is considered truth. The reason I am curious about this is because If nothing we hear, see or read anymore is true, then aren't we all liars?

I started this thread to see if anyone could debunk what I had heard, or if it was infact Truth, that Obama could possibly be befriending terrorists in site of persueing something later on in life could happen. Many say that Bush was the cause of the 9-1-1 attacks, if this is said and could possibly be true, then why couldn't Obama truely be befriendling terrorist to hurt the US in the near future?

Like I said, all my life I have been told don't believe anything you hear, only half of what you see, and about a third of what you read. I am not so sure if anything is true anymore, but, there should be somethings out there posted, written, said, heard, that must be true.

Could this be one of them?

reply to post by racerzeke

---

Really? ... I have not watched Fox since before January, but I do recall them not liking McCain at all.. of course, since putting in a Presidential bid, McCain has changed quite a bit, I used to like him, now hes just another political dirtbag..

kosmicjack (the op only joined 2 months after you mate.. lol )

[edit on 3/12/2008 by Rockpuck]