Originally posted by Christian Voice
Wow quazga, what a great arguement you have there. Name calling always is a great arguement. Have you not read any of my actual posts. I said that
given that sex's intended purpose is for reproduction then homosexuality is unnatural.
Name calling is what happens when you say homosexuals are sinful because one of the thousands of gods humans have had was claimed to have said it.
It may also be what happens when people refer to you as being a bigot for doing so.
But you bring up an interesting question... "What is the intended purpose of sex" Of course that really means you have a "belief" which tends to
make you think all things have an intended purpose, but thats another thread.
I'd like to ask you how you know that sex was intended for only reproduction? Do you know that
Bonobosuse it to relax tensions between tribes to ensure the social fabric and collective survival?
Imagine that.. Sex serving a peacemaking role as opposed to a reproductive role. And do you know what else happens... female bonobos will have sex
with other female bonobos to squelch disagreements as well.
So now, where do you get your data on the "purpose of sex" other than a religious narrative of some sort?
[edit on 12-3-2008 by Quazga]