It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Dmantex
Lets assume for the pupose of this discusion that the September 11th attacks were not a government conspiracy.
What would it take to prove it to you?
Originally posted by tezzajw
Scrap my post... sorry!
I read your initial question wrong.
The only way I could possibly believe that it *might* not be a government conspiracy would be if:
1) All wreckage of the planes was matched with serial numbers and maintenance records to the actual planes that were allegedly involved.
2) All DNA evidence of all human remains was matched with all the people that supposedly died - all independently verified.
3) All pictures from all cameras pointed anywhere near the crash sites were released without editing.
4) George Bush didn't look, sound and act as guilty as hell to explain why he and Cheney were going to front the Commission together, instead of being alone. "It's all politics" my arse!
I won't list further points, I would be here all night. I can't accept that 911 was not an inside job, so pretending otherwise is wasting my time.
Originally posted by jthomas
FALSE. WE do not need serial numbers from aircraft parts to know that AA11, UA175, AA55, andUA93 were the aircraft that crashed. Your claim ignores ALL of the other evidence.
Already done years ago. And we have other evidence.
FALSE. We do need videos to know that all and which aircraft crashed on 9/11. Again, you cannot dismiss all of the other evidence.
Originally posted by Jake the Dog Man
...there has yet to be any evidence to show anything other then what rational people believe.