Originally posted by KilgoreTrout
I appreciate what you are implying, however, the Rothschild's or rather the British Rothschild's do not as such represent the only threat (IMO).
Very good point, thanks.
I merely tried to say that the Rothschilds are at the root of the N.W.O. planning. For example with regards to the Federal Reserve:
From:
FEDERAL RESERVE DIRECTORS: A STUDY OF CORPORATE AND BANKING INFLUENCE
Published 1976
Chart 1 reveals the linear connection between the Rothschilds and the Bank of England, and the London banking houses which ultimately control the
Federal Reserve Banks through their stockholdings of bank stock and their subsidiary firms in New York.
The two principal Rothschild representatives in New York, J. P. Morgan Co., and Kuhn, Loeb & Co. were the firms which set up the Jekyll Island
Conference at which the Federal Reserve Act was drafted, who directed the subsequent successful campaign to have the plan enacted into law by
Congress, and who purchased the controlling amounts of stock in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in 1914.
These firms had their principal officers appointed to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Federal Advisory Council in 1914. In 1914 a few
families (blood or business related) owning controlling stock in existing banks (such as in New York City) caused those banks to purchase controlling
shares in the Federal Reserve regional banks.
Source
Look at the charts presented, interesting reading indeed.
I´ll propose the N.W.O. ratpack culprits in order of magnetude and power:
1) Rothschild
2) Rockefeller
3) Warburg
4) Morgan
They are joined closely together, and have a common goal.
I´m quite sure it was Amschel Mayer Rothschild who in the start of the 19th century laid the foundation for the modern N.W.O. A plan which was
thought out hundreds of years ago, and is now quickly unfolding.
They control the money markets, politics, media and everything in between. All that is left is the consolidation of power, and total hegemonic control
of the planet itself, the first signs of which should become clear in the U.S. within one year.
I´ll make sure to place checkmarks after each point in the scenario unfolds.
|
The reason the european Rothschild's (non British) have not done as well is because they failed to invest in the US and were to an extent excluded.
The British Rothschild's, that is N M Rothschild, were far more savvy, but, have supported the UK and US in opposition of Rockefeller globalist
goals. If you look at the conflict in the early 20th century between Standard Oil and Noble Oil you will start to get an idea of what I mean, also
the Rothschild's influence over the Russian oligarchs.
This is something I am still working on myself so I can't go into any clear detail as I'm still hunting out the information BUT in a sense you can
consider Jacob Rothschild as the opposition to Rockefeller's goals, look at those in the US that he has cultivated - Warren Buffet and Arnie for
starters...plus the Rothshild trust works on a system whereby the individual has to prove themselves, no automatic hereditary power...Jacob is a
self-made man despite his familial wealth not necessarily because of it.
Also a name to add to your list;
Wallenberg (take a look I think you'll find it of interest)
All the best
|
AP: Obama clinches Democratic nomination
According to an Associated Press tally, the Illinois senator has enough delegates to secure the Democratic nomination. NBC News' count shows him
14.5 shy of the 2,118 delegates needed.
msnbc
Tick....
Hillary expresses interest as Obama VP
msnbc
...tock.
|
I would like to know where you get your information from?
Who will carry out this "attack" ???
|
This scenario seems rather predictable and chiched post 9/11. something has to happen that will trigger a simultaneous international response re:
martial law. and the legislative and military mechanisms need to be in place before anything global can occur.
If the USA suddenly clamps down on its citizens after 'the event' and starts locking people in fema camps etc, the rest of the world (think europe,
eurasia, s.e. asia, africa, oceania) will look on in derision at the Guantanamo States of America. the wider world is no where near the point of
swallowing such action...yet. a big event in the USA will not have much impact on the rest of the world, particularly places like russia, china and
india who are not so concerned about the USAs domestic affairs. Americans so often have this habit of thinking their country constitutes the whole
world.
It took Australia 3 years to react to New York's 9/11 tragedy. Autralia's anti-terrorism bills wern't enacted until the middle of 2004. and the
Anti-Terrorism Act was only passed by paliament in 2005. One could argue these laws might not have been passed if the Bali and Jakarta bombings
didn't occur.
consequently i think what we have seen in Bali, Jakarta, Madrid, London, Pakistan, India, Turkey, Chechnya, Beslan and other smaller acts of violence
and terrorism all over the globe, is a more gradual approach to world martial and economic domination by this great beast. where does the centre of
power lie anyway - washington, london or rome? or perhaps moscow, jerusalem, delhi, bejing? every third person has a different answer for different
reasons. perhaps its all of the above.
i think the noose is tightening gradually all over the world, and i see it creeping more in economics and citizenship status laws, rather than blatant
rehashings of major terrorist attacks and world war II nazi-style mass round-ups and detention.
9/11 has done its job. we are still living in its aftermath, and all terrorist attacks since and to come are just waves in the wake of 9/11 - they are
all contributing to the global revolution toward a centralised power, not towards US martial law.
|
