Originally posted by Essan
I admit that when persistent contrails were being studied back in the 60s and 70s it was thought at the time that they produced a small net cooling. This has since been shown to be incorrect.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
When you do some studying of meterology, things that we say will make more sense, perhaps.
What to look for
Now the explanation here is that the aircraft has been fitted with "Six smoke generators were installed under the wings of the 747 to provide a visual image of the trailing vortices." These generators appear to be built on to the wings themselves. If you look at the blowups of the photo at www.dfrc.nasa.gov... you will see that the smoke generators are very small and not very noticeable.
Now if this generator is able to produce smoke, then why not a chemical mixture to form chemtrails. Now if these small generators were to be placed behind each engine, chemical particles could be shot out from the generators and thus mix in together with the jet exhaust. So when the chemicals come out, they are not burned up as or altered if they were mixed with the fuel. Also shielded micoplasmas could easily pass from a generator into the exhaust staying in in tact and preserved. This would then allow the clouds to act as storage tanks for mycoplasmas/viruses/bacteria. Here they could grow then slowly be blown down with the winds or taken down with rain.
The key to this is that these generators are small and basically un-noticeable in the air. Crewmen on the ground would notice them but would not know what they are. If they asked they could be told to mind their own business and do their work.
So what I would like to see is that trail watchers obtain the very best close up photos they can and to look for these telltale generators. If we can get one photo showing them then the cat is in the bag. Also when you go to air shows, get real close to the military jets and look for generators. Also get close up photos of the back exhaust. If they are highly polished, then we must go back to the theory that chemical particles are in the fuel.
Rain water testing has shown the presence of aluminium particles in samples. Will Thomas was told that if aluminium particles are in the fuel, they would act as a polish on the metal. So get those close up shots happening and send them to me for placement.
Thank You!
Originally posted by weedwhacker
It is disingenuous to post something that is patently misleading, isn't it?
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Another thing....just to show you how old that particular photo is, when you look closely you'll see it sports American Airlines livery.
Talk about shoveling on the BS... I can't believe that YOU would be so blatant in your 'debunking' as to post obvious crap... The wake vortex study continued even after the 747 was returned to its primary mission of carrying the Space Shuttle.
Originally posted by amanbuthimself
FACT: German Airface admitted they did it over germany.
)
