posted on Mar, 6 2008 @ 12:31 PM
This is a recent story that has caused me some consternation. The story was reported at SFGate.com and deals with a gov't (EPA) toxicologist who was
dismissed.
www.sfisonline.com.../c/a/2008/02/29/MNK3VB80B.DTL&hw=retardants&sn=007&sc=820
[Under pressure from the chemical industry, the Environmental Protection Agency has dismissed an outspoken scientist who chaired a federal panel
responsible for helping the agency determine the dangers of a flame retardant widely used in electronic equipment.
Toxicologist Deborah Rice was appointed chair of an EPA scientific panel reviewing the chemical a year ago. Federal records show that she was removed
from the panel in August after the American Chemistry Council, the lobbying group for chemical manufacturers, complained to a top-ranking EPA official
that she was biased.
After EPA officials dismissed Rice from the five-member panel, they removed her comments from the panel's report on deca and removed all mention of
her. Three months later, at the request of the chemical industry group, the EPA added a note to the panel report that Rice was removed "due to a
perception of a potential conflict of interest" and that none of her comments was considered in their review of the chemical/]
It’s vexing to know that the corporation’s product being reviewed has the power to influence the findings so. Also a la Winston Smith they have
power to delete passed history and create a product that has been proven in a scientific study to be dangerous. Isn’t there a name for a government
that works with big business to make policy? Who in charge of watching these clowns?
[edit on 6-3-2008 by polanksi]
[edit on 6-3-2008 by polanksi]
[edit on 6-3-2008 by polanksi]
[edit on 6-3-2008 by polanksi]