Psychowars: How to manipulate the masses, page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 63 times


reply posted on 7-3-2008 @ 07:12 PM by Skyfloating
reply to post by scientist



Brilliant additions to the thread. I´d completely forgotten about these techniques myself.


reply posted on 9-3-2008 @ 11:59 AM by Skyfloating
reply to post by scientist



The reason I hadnt brought up those NLP-techniques you mention is because they are more about manipulation on a personal level rather than a mass-psychowarfare level. But interesting nonetheless.


reply posted on 10-3-2008 @ 06:40 AM by Skyfloating
reply to post by Sukhoi50



I would broaden that statement to say "fixed belief-systems", which would also include all the fundamentalist anti-religious movements.


reply posted on 11-3-2008 @ 02:39 PM by Siren
reply to post by Skyfloating



I love this old zen-parable


I love this and I copied it!!! Thanks!!!

Just because its natural for one person, and learned for another, shouldn't mean one person is being themselves and the other is being manipulative.


I have found that when a manipulative person is confronted with their own tactics they usually get pissed off, and say things like “two wrongs don’t make a right.” I think that is a good sign that they are fully aware, whether it is learned or unlearned.

Unless a person is a sociopath or a psychopath, the use of these techniques is more subconscious and impossible to curtail.


Is there a disconnect in the mind that would not enable a person to know how to govern themselves (excluding sociopaths or psychopaths)?

Also, do people relinquish their belief because the world is so screwed up?

I could use a pair of sunglasses from the movie


You could have mine.

Which leads me to also think that may have been attempting to influence my thoughts and behaviour...or manipulate me.


Any manipulation which has been done to me I consider as manure on the garden of life.

So act accordingly


I don’t know about this, it seems as though if you play their game you become them. On the other hand, if they are fishing for falsehood, let them catch the truth of themselves.

Corporate ownership intermingled with secret society members,

etc., etc., etc…

Did you every think what would happen if millions of people all over the world decided to turn off their TV for one week?


reply posted on 11-3-2008 @ 04:46 PM by Skyfloating
reply to post by candlelight32



I had to read this three times before I "got it". Uncomfortably deep stuff


reply posted on 26-3-2008 @ 07:58 AM by Duality
Originally posted by Skyfloating
1. The Yes-Street Technique

I wanna get my audience to agree with something controversial, so I´ll first start by saying a bunch of things that they already agree with and already believe in. This is how I build trust. Then, when I have them all nodding and agreeing at the principles Ive laid out, I can also sell the more disagreeable stuff. This is the basic cult-recruitment technique. You cannot recruit anyone for a cult if you do not first offer enough benefits to get the person hooked. Once hooked you can sell him anything you want. It goes without saying that politicians also love to use this one. This is called "the yes-street technique" because one first gets someone into the habit of saying yes, yes, yes, yes before offering something he/she would have otherwise said "no" to.

Remedy: Discernment. Nothing is completely black or white. Just because organization/politician/book X has said many true things in the past doesnt mean that everything coming from that source is good and true.


This is a great thread, but oh my god do I wish people would take notice of this rule on ATS.

Nobody questions anything on here, especially if the information is from a 'reputable' source. Eg. I was sickened by the Ralph Ring podcast on teleportation, the guy provides no evidence, tells the tallest tale I think I've ever heard but it's accepted because he's 'reputable' or something... Give me a break!

Additionally (and this is something I touch on a lot here) people seem to think that becuase they've already come into the world of alternative thought by joining ATS they too are exempt from providing any evidence or credible stories. Worst of all there's a billion people on here who are ready to hang off every word, no matter how ridiculous and even occasionally defend these posters without ever being able to know if they're telling the truth!

Thanks for the thread but I wish people would take the advice and use it on here, it'd save me a lot of painful reading.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Are You Offended??? SO WHAT!!!
  Posted 9 days ago with 97 member flags
The Image of Baphomet: Upsetting Folks Since 1855.
  Posted 9 days ago with 39 member flags
New Scientific Report Destroys Global Warming!
  Posted 7 days ago with 32 member flags
Al Azif: Is The Necronomicon Real?
  Posted 8 days ago with 25 member flags
What The Hell Is This?
  Posted 5 days ago with 9 member flags
How copyright enforcement robots killed the Hugo Awards
  Posted 7 days ago with 4 member flags